Survey: Accessibility of At-Home COVID-19 Tests for Users with Disabilities

4.1 Limitations

Limited demographic data was collected; participants were asked to provide only their age and which disability type (if any) they identified with. Categorization into disability types was self-identified and many participants identified with multiple disability types. Because this survey was distributed and taken online only, individuals who are less proficient with smartphones and computers were likely under-represented; this is an important user group to study in the future as users with fewer technological skills are less likely to benefit from accessibility aids such as mobile apps, reader technologies, and digital or video instructions.

Due to a conservative approach to data cleaning, legitimate responses may have been removed from the dataset.

4.2 Survey

The survey consisted of three parts: general questions, test-specific questions, and closing questions. The survey began with a series of general questions related to the participant’s demographics, self-identification with a disability, and comfort with technology. Participants also selected which at-home COVID-19 test brands they had used: BinaxNow, iHealth, QuickVue, CareStart, Flowflex, Roche, InteliSwab, On/Go, Ellume, Siemens Clinitest (or “Other” or “I don’t know”). The general questions and answer choices are given in Table 1.

For each test that participants indicated they had used, they were prompted with a series of questions regarding the accessibility of that test. If participants selected ‘I don’t know’ in response to which test(s) they had used, they were prompted with the same questions about their test with the test name removed from the questions. The test-specific questions and answer choices are given in Table 2.

After completing the test-specific questions for each of the tests selected from the test list, participants were asked two closing questions. The closing questions and answer choices are given in Table 3.

5.1 General Questions

Table 4 presents the number and percentage of participants in each age group provided as a survey response option.

Table 5 presents the number of participants who self-identified as belonging to one of the disability categories provided as a response option; participants were able to select multiple responses.

Table 6 presents the self-reported smartphone and computer skills proficiency ratings of participants. Seventeen responses (4.3%) were missing for this question.

5.2 At-home test groups

All ten COVID-19 tests included in the accessibility survey were lateral flow assays (LFAs). These tests were divided into groups depending on whether the results were read visually or with an app reader. The visually read LFAs split into two groups: those with fluid transfer required via a tube with a dropper tip (Group 1), and those without fluid transfer (Group 2). Group 3 consisted of an LFA that used an app reader. The groups are outlined in Table 7.

The survey responses were aggregated for all tests within a group. Survey responses for each group of tests are given below.

5.3 Difficulty Completing Tasks

Table 8 provides the number and percent of users of each group of tests who had difficulty completing the tasks comprising the testing process.

5.4 Tools or Assistance to Perform Test

Table 9 provides the number and percent of users of each group of tests who used tools or assistance to perform the test.

5.5 Conducting the Test on the First Try

Table 10 provides the number and percent of users of each group of tests who were or were not able to conduct the test on their first try.

5.6 Length of Time to Perform Test

Table 11 indicates the length of time users spent performing the test, not including the time spent waiting for results.

5.7 Instruction Format and Access to Electronic Information

Table 12 indicates the format of instructions used with the test.

Table 13 indicates the number and percent of users who were able to access electronic information via a QR Code.

5.8 Ease of Use for Opening Packaging

Table 14 indicates the ease of use for opening the test packaging without assistance.

5.9 Ease of Use for Completing Test Protocol

Table 15 provides the ease of use for completing the test protocol without assistance.

5.10 Interpreting Test Results

Table 16 indicates the ease of use for interpreting test results without assistance.

Table 17 indicates whether or not users were able to interpret test results without assistance.

5.11 Associated App

Table 18 indicates the ease of use of an app associated with the test.

Table 19 indicates how helpful participants found the app for completing the test.

5.12 Valid Test Results

Table 20 indicates the number and percent of users of each group of tests who received a valid test result.

5.13 Customer Support

Table 21 indicates the number and percent of users of each group of tests who attempted to contact customer support.

Table 22 indicates the number and percent of users of each group of tests who were able to talk with customer support.

Table 23 indicates how helpful users found customer support in answering their question(s).

5.14 Change in Experience over Time

Participants who performed a test multiple times were asked about the change in their experience with the test over time. Responses to this question are given in Table 24.

5.15 Final questions

Table 25 presents participants’ feelings toward theoretically receiving only digital instructions in future tests (i.e., no printed instructions received with test kits).

This work is supported by NIH grants U54 EB027690 02S1 and U54 EB027690 05S1. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.