Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Implementation and adaptation of WASH FIT in healthcare facilities: A systematic scoping review

Sena Kpodzro, View ORCID ProfileRyan Cronk, Hannah Lineberger, Lauren Lansing, View ORCID ProfileDarcy M. Anderson
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.15.24312073
Sena Kpodzro
1The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryan Cronk
1The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ryan Cronk
Hannah Lineberger
1The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauren Lansing
1The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Darcy M. Anderson
1The Water Institute, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Darcy M. Anderson
  • For correspondence: darcy.anderson{at}unc.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Environmental health services (e.g., water, sanitation, hygiene, energy) are important for patient safety and strong health systems, yet services in many low- and middle-income countries are poor. To address this, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) developed the Water and Sanitation for Health Facility Improvement Tool (WASH FIT) to drive improvements. While widely used, there is currently no systematic documentation of how WASH FIT has been adapted in different contexts and the implications of these adaptations. We conducted a systematic scoping review to assess WASH FIT adaptation and implementation, specifically evaluating context and implementing stakeholders, the WASH FIT process and adaptation, and good practices for implementation. Our search yielded 20 studies. Implementation was typically government-led or had a high level of government engagement. Few details on healthcare facility contexts were reported. Adaptation was widespread, with nearly all studies deviating from the five-step WASH FIT cycle as designed in the WHO/UNICEF manual. Notably, many studies conducted only one facility assessment and one or no rounds of improvement. However, reporting quality across studies was poor, and some steps may have been conducted but not reported. Despite substantial deviations, WASH FIT was favorably described by all studies. Good practices for implementation included adequate resourcing, government leadership, and providing WASH FIT teams with sufficient training and autonomy to implement improvements. Low-quality reporting and a high degree of adaptation make it challenging to determine how and why WASH FIT achieves change. We hypothesize that healthcare-facility level action by WASH FIT teams to assess conditions and implement improvements has some effect. However, advocacy that uses WASH FIT indicators to highlight deficiencies and promotion of WASH FIT by WHO and UNICEF to pressure governments to act may be equally or more powerful drivers of change. More rigorous evidence to understand how and why WASH FIT works is essential to improve its performance and inform scale-up.

Highlights

  • Adaptation in WASH FIT programs is common but not always evidence-based

  • Some programs initiate WASH FIT assessments but never implement improvements

  • Some programs complete one round of improvements but never iterate the WASH FIT cycle

  • Low-quality evidence impedes research to identify WASH FIT’s theory of change

  • WASH FIT may drive change through national advocacy and peer pressure to unlock funding

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was funded in part by a grant from the Wallace Genetic Foundation to the Water Institute at UNC. Darcy Anderson is supported by a grant from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) (T32ES007018).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 16, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Implementation and adaptation of WASH FIT in healthcare facilities: A systematic scoping review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Implementation and adaptation of WASH FIT in healthcare facilities: A systematic scoping review
Sena Kpodzro, Ryan Cronk, Hannah Lineberger, Lauren Lansing, Darcy M. Anderson
medRxiv 2024.08.15.24312073; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.15.24312073
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Implementation and adaptation of WASH FIT in healthcare facilities: A systematic scoping review
Sena Kpodzro, Ryan Cronk, Hannah Lineberger, Lauren Lansing, Darcy M. Anderson
medRxiv 2024.08.15.24312073; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.15.24312073

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)