Abstract
Background Homelessness staff often experience high job demands, limited resources, and significant emotional strains; with high levels of burnout, stress, and trauma being common within the workforce. Despite growing recognition of these issues, limited information exists regarding interventions to address this.
Aim To conduct a systematic scoping review of interventions aimed at improving well-being and reducing burnout among homelessness staff.
Methods All eligible studies needed to include an intervention addressing burnout and/or well-being in homelessness staff, published in English with primary data. Evidence sources were left open with no data restrictions. Following a registered protocol (available at osf.io/jp5yx), a systematic search of five electronic databases (Medline, APA PsychInfo, Global Health, ASSIA, CINAHL) and Google Scholar was conducted. Studies were double-screened for inclusion. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
Results Out of 5,775 screened studies, six met the inclusion criteria: two peer-reviewed and four non-peer-reviewed publications. No studies were retrieved from Google Scholar. The included studies comprised four quantitative non-randomised designs, one randomised controlled trial, and one mixed-methods study, with four being complex interventions. Three were therapy-based, two included supervision, and two comprised one-time educational sessions. Most were conducted in the United States (n=4), with two in the United Kingdom. The total pooled sample was 347 participants, though four studies were missing demographic data (age and gender). The studies used heterogenous measures and outcomes. Limitations included restrictions to English-only publications, potential gaps in capturing well-being measures, and a limited grey literature scope.
Conclusion There is a lack of research on well-being and burnout interventions in frontline homelessness staff. Identified studies were generally of low quality with a heterogeneity of measures and outcomes used to assess well-being and burnout, limiting generalisability of findings. More robust study designs, along with standardised measures and outcomes, are needed going forwards.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This systematic review involves the analysis and synthesis of data from previously published studies. Therefore, it did not require ethical approval or exemption from an IRB/oversight body.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
The data in this systematic review are from previously published studies, available through the references listed in the manuscript. These references provide the necessary data for the analyses performed in this review and are accessible as follows: Demasi RR. Helping the Helpers: Self-Care to Impact Compassion Fatigue in Volunteers Working With the Homeless [Internet] [Dissertation]. Carlow University 2023. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/helping-helpers-self-care-impact-compassion/docview/2819153475/se-2?accountid=10673 Maguire N, Grellier B, Clayton K. The impact of CBT training and supervision on burnout, confidence and negative beliefs in a staff group working with homeless people. University of Southampton Institutional Repository [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/155113/ Munyoki N. Evaluation of a Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program to Reduce Stress, Burnout, and Insomnia for Behavioral Healthcare Staff [Internet] [Dissertation]. University of North Carolina 2022. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/evaluation-mindfulness-based-stress-reduction/docview/2671623364/se-2?accountid=10673 Jeffrey AC. Effect of feedback on levels of secondary traumatization of workers at battered women’s shelters across the United States [Internet] [Dissertation]. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 1999. Available from: https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/e6832175-bc04-4d0f-989b-0b362e2f2c38/content Moore E, Soh M, Stuber M, Warde C. Well-being for trainees caring for homeless veterans. The Clinical Teacher. 2019 Jul 1116(4). doi: 10.1111/tct.13053 Reeve A, Moghaddam N, Tickle A, Young D. A brief acceptance and commitment intervention for work-related stress and burnout amongst frontline homelessness staff: A single case experimental design series. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 2021 Mar 2528(5). doi: 10.1002/cpp.2555.
