Comprehensive Review of Adverse Effects in Minimally Invasive Cosmetic Procedures: Insights from a Decade of Clinical Data

Cristina Guadalupe Beltrán Muñoz, Elissa Bracamontes Perez, Fernanda Corrales Bay, Aimee Adriana Barajas Nieto, Kate Georgette Rojo Navarro
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.23.24312506

ABSTRACT

Introduction Minimally invasive cosmetic procedures are medical interventions that do not involve the use of surgical incisions. They are usually based on the administration of biocompatible compounds into subcutaneous or dermal tissue. Although considered low-risk, they can have significant adverse effects such as tissue damage or occlusion of superficial blood vessels. Describing their complications is necessary to ensure the responsible use of these resources.

Objective To describe the adverse effects secondary to the use of minimally invasive cosmetic procedures.

Materials and Methods Studies describing the adverse effects of minimally invasive cosmetic procedures were searched in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar from January 2012 to December 2023.

Results A total of 98 articles were included. The administration of hyaluronic acid, botulinum toxin, silicone, and autologous fat grafts were the most commonly used procedures. Local symptoms were the most commonly reported reactions (53 studies). Meanwhile, temporary or permanent blindness was reported in 10 studies, immunological alterations in 8, severe pulmonary involvement in 6, neurological damage in 5, arterial occlusion in 3, and 2 studies reported fatalities.

Conclusion Minimally invasive cosmetic procedures can cause local complications in the majority of cases, but they can also lead to fatal outcomes, particularly in unprofessional settings. Undergoing these techniques requires a comprehensive professional assessment and close follow-up by licensed personnel.

INTRODUCTION

Currently, there is a significant and growing demand for medical procedures aimed at cosmetic enhancement1,2. This trend is particularly evident in the increasing popularity of minimally invasive procedures, which are favored for their effectiveness, ease of application, and shorter recovery times3,4. These procedures often involve the administration of various substances, such as hyaluronic acid, botulinum toxin, autologous fat grafts, and other cellular products, among others5–8. While these compounds have been proven to be stable, biocompatible9, biodegradable and non-toxic10,11, the detailed mechanisms underlying their cellular effects, metabolism, and excretion remain partially understood12. This uncertainty raises concerns about potential tissue damage, particularly across different skin layers and superficial neurovascular bundles13. Despite the widespread use of these procedures, most research has predominantly focused on documenting the adverse effects associated with the most commonly performed interventions14, or those linked to specific application techniques15,16. Furthermore, the unlicensed practice of cosmetic procedures is alarmingly common, which exacerbates the potential risks these interventions present17. This leaves a gap in understanding the broader spectrum of risks these procedures may pose. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive review of the literature with the objective of describing the complications experienced by patients undergoing minimally invasive cosmetic procedures over the past decade. Additionally, we aim to provide a broader perspective on the potential risks associated with these interventions, emphasizing the importance of their responsible use.

METHODS

Using the PICO strategy, we conducted a systematic search in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar repositories, with the following keywords: “aesthetic medicine and side effects” OR “cosmetic medicine and side effects” OR “minimally invasive procedures and iatrogenic” OR “filler injection and side effects” OR “minimally invasive aesthetic medicine and adverse outcomes”. Only original articles published between January 2012 and December 2023, written in English or Spanish, and involving human participants undergoing minimally invasive cosmetic procedures (e.g., appearance modification, enhancement of attractiveness, etc.) were included”. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, expert consensus, pre-clinical experimental studies and in-vitro studies were excluded, as well as studies with unavailable content or imprecise information regarding the interventions used. Articles were filtered by title and abstract by five reviewers, and those with relevant information were selected by consensus. Information on the type of procedure, occurrence of adverse events, and other covariates or interest, was collected for all selected articles.

RESULTS

We encountered a total of 238 candidate articles, of which 55 were excluded for containing information unrelated to the aims of this review, 18 for being in a different language, 10 for being duplicates and 57 due to incomplete data, yielding a total of 108 eligible articles. Of the included articles, a total of 33 studies were randomized and 5 were nonrandomized clinical trials, 8 were retrospective cohort studies and 3 were prospective cohort studies. Additionally, we also included 10 case series, 37 case reports, and 2 “brief reports” (Figure 1, Table 1).

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Summary of research strategy
View this table:
Table 1. Summary of Analyzed Resources.

General characteristics of participants

The total sum of the population analyzed in the studies amounted to 10,231 patients. All participants were adults, aged between 18 and 80 years, with the majority being cisgender women in their third to sixth decade of life. Overall, most of the population was healthy and all of them had voluntarily undergone the procedures. Only participants from 17 studies presented with a relevant medical history, including participants with chronic degenerative diseases (9 studies), individuals with facial and/or body malformations (2 studies), with active infections including HIV and COVID-19 (4 studies), transgender participants (1 study), and a patient with a history of autoimmune disease (1 study) (Table 1). Additionally, the race/ethnicity of most participants was White, followed by Korean and Mestizo populations. Only 3 studies evaluated the effects of these interventions on dark-skinned populations (Fitzpatrick classification > IV).

Procedures performed

Most studies focused on the administration of biocompatible substances of various types into superficial anatomical planes of the subjects to model body structures and enhance the attractiveness of the treated area. The most frequently used compound was commercially formulated hyaluronic acid, utilized in more than 40 studies. Additionally, over half of these studies used combinations of this substance with solvents, local anesthetics (mainly lidocaine), oils, or other components. In 3 of these 62 studies, the origin and composition of the administered hyaluronic acid could not be identified. There was also a noteworthy use of botulinum toxin, administered in 10 studies either as a standalone component or in combination with other substances. Liquid injectable silicone was used in 7 studies. The use of autologous cell products was also prevalent, such as fat grafts (7 studies), platelet-rich plasma (4 studies) or plasma-rich fibrin (1 study). Other substances used less frequently included carbon dioxide, polynucleotide, dextran, phosphatidylcholine, etc.

Intervened areas and responsible health personnel

The most frequently intervened anatomical area was that of the face, chin, and lips (79 studies), particularly in nasolabial folds, cheek areas, and other various sites across the face. This was followed by the gluteal region (16 studies), periorbital, nose and glabella region (8 studies), abdomen (6 studies), and genitalia (2 studies). In most records, the interventions were performed by a specialist physician trained in plastic surgery or another unspecified field. However, there were several instances where the interventions were carried out by unqualified personnel, including uncertified clinics or physicians without a license to perform these procedures. In 3 studies, the intervention was self-administered.

Follow-up of subjects

Excluding case reports and case series studies, the follow-up period for subjects within the studies was highly variable. The follow-up period was less than 6 weeks in 7 studies, between 6 weeks and 6 months in 10 studies, and between 6 to 12 months in 20 studies. Additionally, 8 studies had a duration of around 2 years, 3 a duration of 2-5 years, and 3 had a follow-up period exceeding 5 years.

Minor and local adverse effects

All studies followed common guidelines for recording adverse effects following cosmetic procedures in humans and were classified in early and late complications. Most of the adverse effects observed were of low severity and appeared immediately or within a few days of the intervention. In the majority of these studies, only minimal discomforts such as periorbital edema, erythema, and localized pain were found. Three studies recorded skin pigmentation alterations with patches of hypo- and hyperpigmentation. In addition to the described discomforts, thirty other studies found cases of swelling, more severe edema, and deformities, with all symptoms disappearing within 48 hours to 7 days. Additionally, eleven studies reported the presence of lumps, nodules, deformities with “unaesthetic” results, infections, cellulitis of varying intensity, and dermal necrosis with prolonged or permanent duration in subjects who underwent these interventions. On the other hand, seven studies reported additional complications such as eyelid ptosis and/or extraocular muscle weakness. Episodes of hematoma and mild hemorrhage were reported in five studies.

Severe adverse effects

The most significant adverse effects were recorded in case report studies, populations with medical history of comorbidities, or studies with over 5 years of follow-up. A total of seven cases reported severe pulmonary involvement due to embolisms that caused acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary hemorrhage, and/or alveolar hemorrhage. Moreover, eight studies recorded loss of visual acuity, temporary blindness, or permanent unilateral vision loss. Another eight studies presented immunological alterations such as granuloma formation, autoimmune syndromes, and reactivation of a herpes simplex virus infection. Five studies reported severe neurological symptoms, such as ataxia, vertigo, paralysis of the thoracic limbs, facial paralysis, etc., likely due to damage to the cerebellar region, hippocampus, and temporal cortex. Three papers reported notable cases of arterial occlusion; one causing severe necrosis and infection after hyaluronic acid injections on the nose and nasolabial folds, requiring prolonged treatment with antibiotics; the second generating visual loss due to ophthalmic artery obstruction after platelet-rich plasma injections into the face; and the third resulting in unilateral blindness after hyaluronic acid injections in the glabellar area. One case of kidney failure was reported in a participant after undergoing liquid silicone injection in the buttocks and hips. One study reported 4 hospitalizations and 8 deaths in a cohort of 28 patients who underwent filler injections done by unlicensed individuals. Finally, a report on Mexican and Colombian participants documented 64 deaths, 9 of which occurred immediately after lipo injections in the gluteal area. Table 2 shows the summary of the most common adverse effects found in the population and their approximate incidence per 1000 interventions performed sorted in descending order.

View this table:
Table 2. Incidence of Adverse Events per 1000 Procedures Performed in the Population.

DISCUSSION

In this work, we found various types of adverse effects reported in the medical literature after minimally invasive cosmetic procedures. Although the majority of recorded events corresponded to mild and localized complications with a rapid resolution, the presence of more severe and sometimes fatal complications pose a significant potential risk and calls for a responsible use of these procedures. The studies that reported the longest-lasting adverse effects were largely retrospective studies and clinical trials with follow-up periods extending beyond six months. This longer duration is critical for identifying late-onset complications that may not appear within the shorter follow-up periods commonly used in many studies. As a result, many of these complications may be underreported in the literature, since the delayed onset of these effects makes it difficult to establish a clear causal relationship between the procedure and the adverse outcomes13,15. This issue is especially significant when considering that short-term patient satisfaction, along with the heavy promotion of these procedures as safe and effective, might lead both patients and healthcare providers to downplay or overlook the potential for long-term adverse effects associated with cosmetic interventions. The focus on immediate results can create a false sense of security, where the benefits seem to outweigh any potential risks, thereby obscuring the true safety profile of these procedures18.

Another significant finding of this review is that in almost all studies, women represented the predominant population undergoing these procedures. While it is increasingly common for men to undergo aesthetic procedures, previous studies indicate that the perception of artificial enhancement of appearance differs by sex, with men preferring specific and more discrete procedures such as jawline contouring and hair implants19. Furthermore, a significant number of patients were Asian, particularly of Korean origin. Previous studies indicate the persistence of rigid gender roles in Korean society, which directly influence female self-esteem and personal well-being20, as well as the expected beauty standards in this population21, which likely has a large impact in their use of cosmetic procedures.

The complications described in this review can be grouped into two broad categories: those unrelated to ischemia (pain, erythema, granulomas, infections, etc.), and those secondary to ischemia (arterial occlusion, necrosis, etc.)22. The former were the most prevalent type of complication in the review, including aesthetic alterations such as the formation of nodules and facial asymmetries. The latter can be subdivided into acute or chronic adverse effects. In this review, chronic complications were the most severe, often requiring multidisciplinary and even surgical intervention, as has been previously described for such complications23. Factors associated with these complications are varied, including healthcare professional expertise24, presence of chronic comorbidities, substance abuse25, anatomical positioning of superficial blood vessels, and the molecular size of injected compounds26. However, most studies were conducted on a healthy population that voluntarily underwent the intervention, so there might be factors or pathological conditions unaccounted for during recruitment that favored the occurrence of long-term complications.

In this review, the most frequently administered substances were hyaluronic acid, botulinum toxin, fat implants, and silicone. Although ultra pure hyaluronic acid is primarily obtained through recombinant DNA technology, contaminants in the stabilizers used in its formulation can generate a delayed immune response that predisposes participants to fibrosis and granulomas27, as reported in many studies. Interestingly, the commercial formulations described with greater detail were the ones associated with milder adverse effects, a potential explanation is that different hyaluronic acid formulations are designed for specific skin layers28; thus, their correct choice and administration may reduce the risk of complications. Moreover, their incorrect use is particularly dangerous in certain highly vascularized anatomical areas, such as the glabella and the periocular regions, where small superficial manipulations can trigger emboli formation29,30. On the other hand, injections of botulinum toxin were reported in many studies in which granulomas, cellulitis, and other infections by atypical microorganisms (i.e., mycobacterium), were also present, which is consistent with previous reports31,32. Significant complications were also recorded following the use of silicone, such as implant migration and autoimmune reactions. This can be due to minor contaminations in these implants, in which the presence of microorganisms along with the slow degradation of silicone compounds can favor chronic immune reactions that only become apparent after long follow-up periods33. Lastly, most hospital admission and deaths recorded were secondary to severe complications associated with embolism with arterial obstruction and involvement at the pulmonary, cerebral, and retinal levels. These events can occur after administration of any compound, but they were more common following injections of autologous fat implants and some types of hyaluronic acid formulations. Although fat implants undergo comprehensive filtration processes34, migration through the bloodstream remains a significant risk associated with their application35. On the other hand, the higher viscosity and hydrophilicity of hyaluronic acid formulations facilitates its adhesion to vascular walls, increasing the risk of vascular-related complications36. Although it is believed that negative aspiration before injection may reduce risk, in reality complications can still occur due to a combination of factors such as perivascular injuries or anatomical positioning, which can favor the release of the administered compound into the bloodstream37. In this regard, a thorough knowledge of injection site anatomy and patient history (e.g., presence of chronic conditions and allergies, use of blood thinners), a correct injection technique, and the application of adequate antiseptic procedures with non-irritating substances are more reliable safety measures to prevent undesirable adverse effects38. Additionally, the use of ultrasound in these interventions should be considered as a safer approach, offering enhanced precision and potentially reducing the risk of complications.39.

In conclusion, minimally invasive aesthetic procedures, while popular, can result in adverse effects of varying severity. The possibility of unnoticed long-term effects poses an additional concern for both users and healthcare professionals. To minimize risks, it is highly recommended to reduce patient risk factors and enhance procedural accuracy through techniques such as ultrasound guidance. Finally, ensuring that these procedures are exclusively performed by qualified medical personnel is crucial to maintaining patient safety and the overall integrity of the field.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

FUNDING

No funding was received.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

CGBM, EBP, FCB, AABN, and KGRN were jointly involved in selecting and reviewing the resources, as well as in drafting and structuring the manuscript. CGBM was responsible for the conception, integration, and final structuring of the manuscript.

ETHICAL APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

Not applicable. This study only uses non-identifiable patient information.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable. The publication of these data does not compromise the anonymity or confidentiality of any patient.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Footnotes

  • CONFLICT OF INTERESTS: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Laughter MR, Anderson JB, Maymone MBC, Kroumpouzos G. Psychology of aesthetics: Beauty, social media, and body dysmorphic disorder. Clin Dermatol. 2023;41(1):28–32.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    Carella F, Degli Esposti L, Adamiano A, Iafisco M. The Use of Calcium Phosphates in Cosmetics, State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 25;14(21):6398.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    Feng L, Zhai X. Regulation concerns of supply and demand sides for aesthetic medicine from Chinese perspective. Dev World Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(3):277–84.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Haut C. [New technologies for noninvasive aesthetic treatments]. Dermatologie (Heidelb). 2023 Oct;74(10):759–64.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Moradi A, Watson J. Current Concepts in Filler Injection. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2015 Nov;23(4):489–94.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.
    Zeplin PH, Sukhova I, Kranz A, Nürnberger T, Mihalceanu S, Beescho C, et al. Recombinant Silk Hydrogel as a Novel Dermal Filler Component: Preclinical Safety and Efficacy Studies of a New Class of Tissue Fillers. Aesthet Surg J. 2020 Aug 14;40(9):NP511–8.
  7. 7.
    Valachová K, Šoltés L. Hyaluronan as a Prominent Biomolecule with Numerous Applications in Medicine. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jun 30;22(13):7077.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    Jankovic J. Botulinum toxin: State of the art. Mov Disord. 2017 Aug;32(8):1131–8.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    Amiri R, Khalili M, Iranmanesh B, Ahramiyanpour N, Karvar M, Aflatoonian M. The innovative application of autologous biofillers in aesthetic dermatology. Ital J Dermatol Venerol. 2023 Aug;158(4):321–7.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    Vyas KS, Kaufman J, Munavalli GS, Robertson K, Behfar A, Wyles SP. Exosomes: the latest in regenerative aesthetics. Regen Med. 2023 Feb;18(2):181–94.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    Dorozhkin SV. Calcium Orthophosphates as Bioceramics: State of the Art. J Funct Biomater. 2010 Nov 30;1(1):22–107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Sergi R, Bellucci D, Cannillo V. A Review of Bioactive Glass/Natural Polymer Composites: State of the Art. Materials (Basel). 2020 Dec 6;13(23):5560.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    Rogiers V, Benfenati E, Bernauer U, Bodin L, Carmichael P, Chaudhry Q, et al. The way forward for assessing the human health safety of cosmetics in the EU - Workshop proceedings. Toxicology. 2020 Apr 30;436:152421.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    Urdiales-Gálvez F, Delgado NE, Figueiredo V, Lajo-Plaza JV, Mira M, Moreno A, et al. Treatment of Soft Tissue Filler Complications: Expert Consensus Recommendations. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Apr;42(2):498–510.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    Colon J, Mirkin S, Hardigan P, Elias MJ, Jacobs RJ. Adverse Events Reported From Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler Injections to the Facial Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 15(4):e38286.
  16. 16.↵
    Mannino M, Lupi E, Bernardi S, Becelli R, Giovannetti F. Vascular complications with necrotic lesions following filler injections: Literature systematic review. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 May 12;101499.
  17. 17.↵
    Styperek A, Bayers S, Beer M, Beer K. Nonmedical-grade Injections of Permanent Fillers: Medical and Medicolegal Considerations. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2013 Apr;6(4):22–9.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Cho Chung HI, Kim YA. Perception of cosmetic surgery and associated side effects. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jan 21;101(3):e28641.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    Rostovtseva VV, Butovskaya ML, Mezentseva AA, Weissing FJ. Effects of sex and sex-related facial traits on trust and trustworthiness: An experimental study. Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 5;13:925601.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    Li J, Liu Y, Song J. The Relationship Between Gender Self-Stereotyping and Life Satisfaction: The Mediation Role of Relational Self-Esteem and Personal Self-Esteem. Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 7;12:769459.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    Kim SY, Seo YS, Baek KY. Face consciousness among South Korean women: a culture-specific extension of objectification theory. J Couns Psychol. 2014 Jan;61(1):24–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Witmanowski H, Błochowiak K. Another face of dermal fillers. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2020 Oct;37(5):651–9.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    Ghareeb FM, Hassan MSA, El Nahas MA, Salem MSES. Complicated Facial Fillers: Management Algorithm. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Jul;10(7):e4445.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    Galanis C, Sanchez IS, Roostaeian J, Crisera C. Factors influencing patient interest in plastic surgery and the process of selecting a surgeon. Aesthet Surg J. 2013 May;33(4):585–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Schlager JG, Hartmann D, Wallmichrath J, Ruiz San Jose V, Patzer K, French LE, et al. Patient-dependent risk factors for wound infection after skin surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2022 Nov;19(7):1748–57.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    Kato JM, Matayoshi S. Visual loss after aesthetic facial filler injection: a literature review on an ophthalmologic issue. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2022;85(3):309–19.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    López Pérez V. COVID-19 and Dermal Fillers: Should We Really Be Concerned? Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2022 Oct;113(9):888–94.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    Kapoor KM, Saputra DI, Porter CE, Colucci L, Stone C, Brenninkmeijer EEA, et al. Treating Aging Changes of Facial Anatomical Layers with Hyaluronic Acid Fillers. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021;14:1105–18.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    Zein M, Tie-Shue R, Pirakitikulr N, Lee WW. Complications after cosmetic periocular filler: prevention and management. Plast Aesthet Res. 2020;7:44.
  30. 30.↵
    Wang HC, Yu N, Wang X, Dong R, Long X, Feng X, et al. Cerebral Embolism as a Result of Facial Filler Injections: A Literature Review. Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Feb 15;42(3):NP162–75.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    Machado RA, Oliveira LQ, Martelli-Júnior H, Pires FR, Carvas JB, Rogerio VE, et al. Adverse reactions to the injection of face and neck aesthetic filling materials: a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023 May 1;28(3):e278–84.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    Wong SSY, Wong SCY, Yuen KY. Infections associated with body modification. J Formos Med Assoc. 2012 Dec;111(12):667–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Trinh LN, McGuigan KC, Gupta A. Delayed Granulomas as a Complication Secondary to Lip Augmentation with Dermal Fillers: A Systematic Review. Surg J (N Y). 2022 Jan;8(1):e69–79.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    Simonacci F, Bertozzi N, Grieco MP, Grignaffini E, Raposio E. Procedure, applications, and outcomes of autologous fat grafting. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Aug;20:49–60.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    Schiraldi L, Sapino G, Meuli J, Maruccia M, Cherubino M, Raffoul W, et al. Facial Fat Grafting (FFG): Worth the Risk? A Systematic Review of Complications and Critical Appraisal. J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 11;11(16):4708.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    Sun Y, Nie F, Wang G, Li Q, Xie H. An experimental study of the vascular embolism caused by recombinant type III collagen implants and hyaluronic acid. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023 Oct;22(10):2705–13.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    Goodman GJ, Magnusson MR, Callan P, Roberts S, Hart S, Lin F, et al. Aspiration Before Tissue Filler—An Exercise in Futility and Unsafe Practice. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Jan 29;42(1):89–101.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.↵
    Goodman GJ, Liew S, Callan P, Hart S. Facial aesthetic injections in clinical practice: Pretreatment and posttreatment consensus recommendations to minimise adverse outcomes. Australas J Dermatol. 2020 Aug;61(3):217–25.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.↵
    Heydenrych I, De Boulle K, Kapoor KM, Bertossi D. The 10-Point Plan 2021: Updated Concepts for Improved Procedural Safety During Facial Filler Treatments. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021;14:779–814.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.
    Fino P, Toscani M, Grippaudo FR, Giordan N, Scuderi N. Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study on the Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Injectable Cross-linked Hyaluronic Gel for the Correction of Moderate-to-Severe Nasolabial Wrinkles. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;43(2):470–9.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.
    Han SW, Park MJ, Lee SH. Hyaluronic acid-induced diffuse alveolar hemorrhage: unknown complication induced by a well-known injectable agent. Ann Transl Med. 2019 Jan;7(1):13.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.
    Calonge WM, Lesbros-Pantoflickova D, Hodina M, Elias B. Massive subcutaneous emphysema after carbon dioxide mesotherapy. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Feb;37(1):194–7.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.
    Curi MM, Cardoso CL, Curra C, Koga D, Benini MB. Late-onset adverse reactions related to hyaluronic Acid dermal filler for aesthetic soft tissue augmentation. J Craniofac Surg. 2015 May;26(3):782–4.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.
    Martin DS, Han H, Farley KL. Self Injection of Topical Skin Preparation by Patient Seeking Facial Volume Enhancement: A Case Report. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2019 Aug;12(8):51–4.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.
    Kaminagakura E, Rosa JA, Carvalho YR, Almeida JD. Undesirable effect of cosmetic lip augmentation with autologous fat tissue. BMC Res Notes. 2013 Mar 5;6:79.
  46. 46.
    Lee YB, Song EJ, Kim SS, Kim JW, Yu DS. Safety and efficacy of a novel injectable filler in the treatment of nasolabial folds: polymethylmethacrylate and cross-linked dextran in hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2014 Aug;16(4):185–90.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.
    Choi WJ, Han SW, Kim JE, Kim HW, Kim MB, Kang H. The Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine-Containing Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler for Treatment of Nasolabial Folds: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Dec;39(6):953–62.
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.
    Choi SY, Shin SH, Seok J, Yoo KH, Kim BJ. Management strategies for vascular complications in hyaluronic acid filler injections: A case series analysis. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023 Dec;22(12):3261–7.
    OpenUrl
  49. 49.
    Moradi A, Allen S, Bank D, Marmur E, Fagien S, Glaser DA, et al. A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Split-Hand Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Large-Gel-Particle Hyaluronic Acid with Lidocaine for the Correction of Volume Deficits in the Dorsal Hand. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Oct;144(4):586e–96e.
    OpenUrl
  50. 50.
    Blanco J, Gaines S, Arshad J, Sheele JM. Silicone pneumonitis, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage and acute respiratory distress syndrome from gluteal silicone injections. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;36(12):2340.e3-2340.e4.
    OpenUrl
  51. 51.
    Camuzard O, Dumas P, Foissac R, Fernandez J, David S, Balaguer T, et al. Severe granulomatous reaction associated with hypercalcemia occurring after silicone soft tissue augmentation of the buttocks: a case report. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014 Feb;38(1):95–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.
    Roberts SAI, Arthurs BP. Severe visual loss and orbital infarction following periorbital aesthetic poly-(L)-lactic acid (PLLA) injection. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;28(3):e68–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.
    López PV, García PT, López-Pitalúa JA, Pinto H. Side effects after hyaluronic acid facial injection in adults during COVID-19 pandemic. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023 Jun;22(6):1714–9.
    OpenUrl
  54. 54.
    Carella S, Romanzi A, Ciotti M, Onesti MG. Skin ulcer: a long-term complication after massive liquid silicone oil infiltration. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Dec;37(6):1220–4.
    OpenUrl
  55. 55.
    Apostolou A, Bolcen SJ, Dave V, Jani N, Lasker BA, Tan CG, et al. Nocardia cyriacigeorgica infections attributable to unlicensed cosmetic procedures--an emerging public health problem? Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;55(2):251–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.
    Downie JB, Grimes PE, Callender VD. A multicenter study of the safety and effectiveness of hyaluronic acid with a cohesive polydensified matrix for treatment of nasolabial folds in subjects with Fitzpatrick skin types IV, V, and VI. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Oct;132(4 Suppl 2):41S–47S.
    OpenUrl
  57. 57.
    Lee SH, Min HJ, Kim YW, Cheon YW. The Efficacy and Safety of Early Postoperative Botulinum Toxin A Injection for Facial Scars. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Apr;42(2):530–7.
    OpenUrl
  58. 58.
    Chang YS, Chang CC, Shen JH, Chen YT, Chan KKW. Nonallergic Eyelid Edema After Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection: Case Report and Review of Literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(38):e1610.
    OpenUrl
  59. 59.
    Min S, Yoon JY, Park SY, Moon J, Kwon HH, Suh DH. Combination of platelet rich plasma in fractional carbon dioxide laser treatment increased clinical efficacy of for acne scar by enhancement of collagen production and modulation of laser-induced inflammation. Lasers Surg Med. 2018 Apr;50(4):302–10.
    OpenUrl
  60. 60.
    Lee YJ, Kim HT, Lee YJ, Paik SH, Moon YS, Lee WJ, et al. Comparison of the effects of polynucleotide and hyaluronic acid fillers on periocular rejuvenation: a randomized, double-blind, split-face trial. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 Feb;33(1):254–60.
    OpenUrl
  61. 61.
    Alaraj AM, Oystreck DT, Bosley TM. Variable ptosis after botulinum toxin type a injection with positive ice test mimicking ocular myasthenia gravis. J Neuroophthalmol. 2013 Jun;33(2):169–71.
    OpenUrl
  62. 62.
    Alijotas-Reig J, Fernández-Figueras MT, Puig L. Pseudocystic encapsulation: a late noninflammatory complication of hyaluronic acid filler injections. Dermatol Surg. 2013 Nov;39(11):1726–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  63. 63.
    Bohnert K, Dorizas A, Lorenc P, Sadick NS. Randomized, Controlled, Multicentered, Double-Blind Investigation of Injectable Poly-L-Lactic Acid for Improving Skin Quality. Dermatol Surg. 2019 May;45(5):718–24.
    OpenUrl
  64. 64.
    Zhao H, Ren R, Bao S, Qian W, Ma X, Wang R, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Polycaprolactone in Treating Nasolabial Folds: A Prospective, Multicenter, and Randomized Controlled Trial. Facial Plast Surg. 2023 Jun;39(3):300–6.
    OpenUrl
  65. 65.
    Nacopoulos C, Vesala AM. Lower facial regeneration with a combination of platelet-rich fibrin liquid matrices based on the low speed centrifugation concept-Cleopatra technique. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Jan;19(1):185–9.
    OpenUrl
  66. 66.
    Jeong GJ, Ahn GR, Park SJ, Hong JY, Kim BJ. A randomized, patient/evaluator-blinded, split-face study to compare the efficacy and safety of polycaprolactone and polynucleotide fillers in the correction of crow’s feet: The latest biostimulatory dermal filler for crow’s feet. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Jul;19(7):1593–9.
    OpenUrl
  67. 67.
    Reeds DN, Mohammed BS, Klein S, Boswell CB, Young VL. Metabolic and structural effects of phosphatidylcholine and deoxycholate injections on subcutaneous fat: a randomized, controlled trial. Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Mar;33(3):400–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. 68.
    Beer K, Glogau RG, Dover JS, Shamban A, Handiwala L, Olin JT, et al. A randomized, evaluator-blinded, controlled study of effectiveness and safety of small particle hyaluronic acid plus lidocaine for lip augmentation and perioral rhytides. Dermatol Surg. 2015 Apr;41 Suppl 1:S127–136.
    OpenUrl
  69. 69.
    Bertucci V, Solish N, Kaufman-Janette J, Yoelin S, Shamban A, Schlessinger J, et al. DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection has a prolonged duration of response in the treatment of glabellar lines: Pooled data from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Apr;82(4):838–45.
    OpenUrl
  70. 70.
    Rzany B, Griffiths T, Walker P, Lippert S, McDiarmid J, Havlickova B. Reduction of unwanted submental fat with ATX-101 (deoxycholic acid), an adipocytolytic injectable treatment: results from a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Br J Dermatol. 2014 Feb;170(2):445–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. 71.
    Jilani N, Shabbir J, Nemytova E. Liquid Silicone-Induced Extensive and Debilitating Granulomatosis Responding to Hydroxychloroquine. Case Rep Rheumatol. 2019;2019:8173790.
  72. 72.
    Choi SY, Lee YH, Kim H, Koh HJ, Park SY, Park WS, et al. A combination trial of intradermal radiofrequency and hyaluronic acid filler for the treatment of nasolabial fold wrinkles: a pilot study. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2014 Jan;16(1):37–42.
    OpenUrl
  73. 73.
    Demir E, Perez-Bouza A, Pallua N. Adverse late reactions after cosmetic implantation of hydroxyethylmethacrylate particles suspended in hyaluronic acid: clinics and complication management. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Jun;37(3):576–86.
    OpenUrl
  74. 74.
    Siperstein R, Nestor E, Meran S, Grunebaum L. A split-face, blind, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Sep;21(9):3768–78.
    OpenUrl
  75. 75.
    Araco A, Araco F, Raichi M. Clinical efficacy and safety of polynucleotides highly purified technology (PN-HPT®) and cross-linked hyaluronic acid for moderate to severe nasolabial folds: A prospective, randomized, exploratory study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023 Jan;22(1):146–55.
    OpenUrl
  76. 76.
    Joo HJ, Woo YJ, Kim JE, Kim BJ, Kang H. A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine-Containing Monophasic Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Nasolabial Folds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar;137(3):799–808.
    OpenUrl
  77. 77.
    Kim MJ, Kim JH, Cheon HI, Hur MS, Han SH, Lee YW, et al. Assessment of Skin Physiology Change and Safety After Intradermal Injections With Botulinum Toxin: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Split-Face Pilot Study in Rosacea Patients With Facial Erythema. Dermatol Surg. 2019 Sep;45(9):1155–62.
    OpenUrl
  78. 78.
    Leonardis M, Palange A. New-generation filler based on cross-linked carboxymethylcellulose: study of 350 patients with 3-year follow-up. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:147–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. 79.
    Lorenc ZP, Bruce S, Werschler WP. Safety and efficacy of a continuous-flow, injection-assisted device in delivery of dermal fillers. Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Jul;33(5):705–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. 80.
    Nisi G, Cuomo R, Brandi C, Grimaldi L, Sisti A, D’Aniello C. Carbon dioxide therapy and hyaluronic acid for cosmetic correction of the nasolabial folds. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016 Jun;15(2):169–75.
    OpenUrl
  81. 81.
    Park KY, Seok J, Rho NK, Kim BJ, Kim MN. Long-chain polynucleotide filler for skin rejuvenation: efficacy and complications in five patients. Dermatol Ther. 2016;29(1):37–40.
    OpenUrl
  82. 82.
    Shin SJ, Her Y, Yu DS, Kim CW, Kim SS. Twenty-four-week multicenter, evaluator-blinded clinical study of the efficacy and safety of a dextran filler in the treatment of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg. 2014 Jun;40(6):652–7.
    OpenUrl
  83. 83.
    Hachach-Haram N, Gregori M, Kirkpatrick N, Young R, Collier J. Complications of facial fillers: resource implications for NHS hospitals. BMJ Case Rep. 2013 Jan 28;2013:bcr2012007141, bcr-2012–007141.
  84. 84.
    Few J, Cox SE, Paradkar-Mitragotri D, Murphy DK. A Multicenter, Single-Blind Randomized, Controlled Study of a Volumizing Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Midface Volume Deficit: Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years. Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Jul;35(5):589–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. 85.
    Galadari H, van Abel D, Al Nuami K, Al Faresi F, Galadari I. A randomized, prospective, blinded, split-face, single-center study comparing polycaprolactone to hyaluronic acid for treatment of nasolabial folds. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015 Mar;14(1):27–32.
    OpenUrl
  86. 86.
    Hatcher JL, Goldman ND. Recognition and treatment of non-infectious hyaluronic acid reactions. J Dermatolog Treat. 2014 Dec;25(6):513–5.
    OpenUrl
  87. 87.
    Jones D, Murphy DK. Volumizing hyaluronic acid filler for midface volume deficit: 2-year results from a pivotal single-blind randomized controlled study. Dermatol Surg. 2013 Nov;39(11):1602–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. 88.
    Alsuhaibani AH, Alfawaz N. Lower eyelid swelling as a late complication of Bio-Alcamid filler into the malar area. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;25(1):75–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  89. 89.
    Seok J, Choi SY, Park KY, Jang JH, Bae JH, Kim BJ, et al. Depressed scar after filler injection successfully treated with pneumatic needleless injector and radiofrequency device. Dermatol Ther. 2016;29(1):45–7.
    OpenUrl
  90. 90.
    Chayangsu O, Wanitphakdeedecha R, Pattanaprichakul P, Hidajat IJ, Evangelista KER, Manuskiatti W. Legal vs. illegal injectable fillers: The adverse effects comparison study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Jul;19(7):1580–6.
    OpenUrl
  91. 91.
    Kerfant N, Philandrianos C, Alliez A, Casanova D. Inadvertent subcutaneous injection of hypertonic saline solution during lipofilling. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Aug;37(4):709–10.
    OpenUrl
  92. 92.
    Kim DH, Jang HW, Kim HJ, Son SW. Dystrophic calcifications after autologous fat injection on face. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2014 Jun;16(3):138–40.
    OpenUrl
  93. 93.
    Maione L, Vinci V, Klinger M, Klinger FM, Caviggioli F. Autologous fat graft by needle: analysis of complications after 1000 patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Mar;74(3):277–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  94. 94.
    Polat M, Üstün H. A case of mesotherapy-induced panniculitis. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2016;35(2):163–4.
    OpenUrl
  95. 95.
    Suh DH, Jang HW, Lee SJ, Lee WS, Ryu HJ. Outcomes of polydioxanone knotless thread lifting for facial rejuvenation. Dermatol Surg. 2015 Jun;41(6):720–5.
    OpenUrl
  96. 96.
    Berguiga M, Galatoire O. Tear trough rejuvenation: A safety evaluation of the treatment by a semi-cross-linked hyaluronic acid filler. Orbit. 2017 Feb;36(1):22–6.
    OpenUrl
  97. 97.
    Wünscher SV, Cambiaso-Daniel J, Gualdi A, Rappl T. Long-term Complications of Gluteal Augmentation Using Aquafilling Filler: A Case Report. Indian J Plast Surg. 2023 Jun;56(3):267–9.
    OpenUrl
  98. 98.
    Martinez-Lopez A, Pérez-Lopez I, Sánchez-Cano D, Ruiz-Villaverde R. Nódulos subcutáneos faciales de 3 meses de evolución. Dermatol Online J. 2017 Feb 15;23(2):13030/qt53p393n2.
  99. 99.
    Fabi SG, Cohen JL, Green LJ, Dhawan S, Kontis TC, Baumann L, et al. DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines: Efficacy Results From SAKURA 3, a Large, Open-Label, Phase 3 Safety Study. Dermatol Surg. 2021 Jan 1;47(1):48–54.
    OpenUrl
  100. 100.
    Kim SK, Kim JH, Hwang K. Skin Necrosis of the Nose After Injection of Ribose Cross-Linked Porcine Atelocollagen. J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Oct;26(7):2211–2.
    OpenUrl
  101. 101.
    Grippaudo FR, Di Girolamo M, Mattei M, Pucci E, Grippaudo C. Diagnosis and management of dermal filler complications in the perioral region. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2014 Oct;16(5):246–52.
    OpenUrl
  102. 102.
    Hexsel D, Soirefmann M, Porto MD, Siega C, Schilling-Souza J, Rodrigues TC. Fields of muscular and anhidrotic effects of 2 botulinum toxin-A commercial preparations: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, multicenter study. Dermatol Surg. 2015 Jan;41 Suppl 1:S110–118.
    OpenUrl
  103. 103.
    Szantyr A, Orski M, Marchewka I, Szuta M, Orska M, Zapała J. Ocular Complications Following Autologous Fat Injections into Facial Area: Case Report of a Recovery from Visual Loss After Ophthalmic Artery Occlusion and a Review of the Literature. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017 Jun;41(3):580–4.
    OpenUrl
  104. 104.
    Kim BW, Park GH, Yun WJ, Rho NK, Jang KA, Won CH, et al. Adverse events associated with botulinum toxin injection: a multidepartment, retrospective study of 5310 treatments administered to 1819 patients. J Dermatolog Treat. 2014 Aug;25(4):331–6.
    OpenUrl
  105. 105.
    Kim SN, Byun DS, Park JH, Han SW, Baik JS, Kim JY, et al. Panophthalmoplegia and vision loss after cosmetic nasal dorsum injection. J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Apr;21(4):678–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. 106.
    Noh TK, Moon HR, Yu JS, Chang SE, Moon IJ, Choi SY, et al. Effects of highly concentrated hyaluronic acid filler on nasolabial fold correction: A 24-month extension study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2016 Nov;27(6):510–4.
    OpenUrl
  107. 107.
    Roh NK, Kim MJ, Lee YW, Choe YB, Ahn KJ. A Split-Face Study of the Effects of a Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid-Based Gel of Nonanimal Origin for Facial Skin Rejuvenation Using a Stamp-Type Multineedle Injector: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar;137(3):809–16.
    OpenUrl
  108. 108.
    Ibrahim ZAES, El-Tatawy RA, El-Samongy MA, Ali DAM. Comparison between the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma vs. microdermabrasion in the treatment of striae distensae: clinical and histopathological study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015 Dec;14(4):336–46.
    OpenUrl
  109. 109.
    Mahmood Faris BJ. The Use of Facial Fillers in Clinical Practice: The Level of Patient Satisfaction and an Overview of Common Clinical Complications. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2024 May;115(5):458–65.
    OpenUrl
  110. 110.
    Singarajah A, Wang A, Sayegh J, Vilke GM, Quenzer FC. “Botched”: A Case Report of Silicone Embolism Syndrome After Penile and Scrotal Injection. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2020 Nov;4(4):595–8.
    OpenUrl
  111. 111.
    Essenmacher AC, Astani SA. Respiratory Disease following Illicit Injection of Silicone: A Case Report. Case Rep Med. 2013;2013:743842.
  112. 112.
    Jang JG, Hong KS, Choi EY. A case of nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism after facial injection of hyaluronic Acid in an illegal cosmetic procedure. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2014 Aug;77(2):90–3.
    OpenUrl
  113. 113.
    Shaheen S, Al-Habbaa A, Riad MS, Mandour AS, Elzeny MA, Alnady K. Fatal pulmonary embolism following injectable gluteal filler usage: a case report. Egypt Heart J. 2023 Oct 10;75(1):83.
    OpenUrl
  114. 114.
    Kim DY, Eom JS, Kim JY. Temporary blindness after an anterior chamber cosmetic filler injection. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Jun;39(3):428–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  115. 115.
    Salval A, Ciancio F, Margara A, Bonomi S. Impending Facial Skin Necrosis and Ocular Involvement After Dermal Filler Injection: A Case Report. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017 Oct;41(5):1198–201.
    OpenUrl
  116. 116.
    Kwon SG, Hong JW, Roh TS, Kim YS, Rah DK, Kim SS. Ischemic oculomotor nerve palsy and skin necrosis caused by vascular embolization after hyaluronic acid filler injection: a case report. Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Oct;71(4):333–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  117. 117.
    Hsieh YH, Lin CW, Huang JS, Yeh PT. Severe ocular complications following facial calcium hydroxylapatite injections: Two case reports. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2015;5(1):36–9.
    OpenUrl
  118. 118.
    Karam EZ, Gan A, Muci Mendoza R, Martinez E, Perez E. Visual Loss after Platelet-rich Plasma Injection into the Face. Neuroophthalmology. 2020;44(6):371–8.
    OpenUrl
  119. 119.
    Madala S, Bao YK, Lee JH, Gluckstein J, Chang J, Zhang-Nunes S. Phthisical eye and orbital ischemia after cosmetic platelet-rich plasma injection to the forehead. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2024 Jun;34:101968.
    OpenUrl
  120. 120.
    Wang C, Sun T, Yu N, Wang X. Herpes reactivation after the injection of hyaluronic acid dermal filler: A case report and review of literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 12;99(24):e20394.
    OpenUrl
  121. 121.
    Ryeung Park Y, Choi JA, Yoon La T. Periorbital lipogranuloma after cryopreserved autologous fat injection at forehead: unexpected complication of a popular cosmetic procedure. Can J Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;48(6):e166–168.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  122. 122.
    Seok J, Hong JY, Park KY, Kim BJ, Seo SJ, Kim MN, et al. Delayed immunologic complications due to injectable fillers by unlicensed practitioners: our experiences and a review of the literature. Dermatol Ther. 2016;29(1):41–4.
    OpenUrl
  123. 123.
    Seo JW, Sa HS. Periorbital Lipogranuloma Following Facial Autologous Fat Injections: Non-surgical Treatment. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Dec;39(6):946–52.
    OpenUrl
  124. 124.
    Joseph JH, Shamban A, Eaton L, Lehman A, Cohen S, Spencer J, et al. Polymethylmethacrylate Collagen Gel-Injectable Dermal Filler for Full Face Atrophic Acne Scar Correction. Dermatol Surg. 2019 Dec;45(12):1558–66.
    OpenUrl
  125. 125.
    Li GF, Ban S, Wang M, Zhang J, Lu H, Shi YH, et al. Brain functional changes in patients with botulism after illegal cosmetic injections of botulinum toxin: A resting-state fMRI study. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0207448.
    OpenUrl
  126. 126.
    Lee JS, Kim JY, Woo SJ. Unilateral Blindness With Bilateral Brain Infarction After Cosmetic Facial Filler Injection. J Neuroophthalmol. 2021 Dec 1;41(4):e566–71.
    OpenUrl
  127. 127.
    Wang DW, Yin YM, Yao YM. Internal and external carotid artery embolism following facial injection of autologous fat. Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Nov;34(8):NP83–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  128. 128.
    Davidova P, Müller M, Wenner Y, König C, Kenikstul N, Kohnen T. Ophthalmic artery occlusion after glabellar hyaluronic acid filler injection. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2022 Jun;26:101407.
    OpenUrl
  129. 129.
    Mayer JE, Goldberg DJ. Injuries Attributable to Cosmetic Procedures Performed by Unlicensed Individuals in the United States. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015 Oct;8(10):35–7.
    OpenUrl
  130. 130.
    Cárdenas-Camarena L, Bayter JE, Aguirre-Serrano H, Cuenca-Pardo J. Deaths Caused by Gluteal Lipoinjection: What Are We Doing Wrong? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jul;136(1):58–66.
    OpenUrl
  131. 131.
    Yoo SJ, Lee KH, Jung SN, Heo ST. Facial skin and soft tissue infection caused by Mycobacterium wolinskyi associated with cosmetic procedures. BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Oct 16;13:479.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  132. 132.
    Gan SD, Itkin A, Wolpowitz D. Hyaluronic acid-induced alopecia: a novel complication. Dermatol Surg. 2013 Nov;39(11):1724–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  133. 133.
    Jung JM, Lee WS, Kim HT, Moon YS, Paik SH, Lee WJ, et al. A Multi-center, randomized, double blinded, comparative study of two hyaluronic acid fillers for temporary restoration of mid-face volume in Asians. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Jul;19(7):1619–26.
    OpenUrl
  134. 134.
    Nikolis A, Enright KM, Öhrlund Å, Winlöf P, Cotofana S. A randomized, split-face, double-blind, comparative study of the safety and efficacy of small- and large-particle hyaluronic acid fillers for the treatment of nasolabial folds. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 May;20(5):1450–8.
    OpenUrl
  135. 135.
    Kamouna B, Kazandjieva J, Balabanova M, Dourmishev L, Negentsova Z, Etugov D, et al. Oil-soluble vitamins: illegal use for lip augmentation. Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Dec;30(6):635–43.
    OpenUrl
  136. 136.
    Braccini F, Fanian F, Garcia P, Delmar H, Loreto F, Benadiba L, et al. Comparative clinical study for the efficacy and safety of two different hyaluronic acid-based fillers with Tri-Hyal versus Vycross technology: A long-term prospective randomized clinical trial. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023 Feb;22(2):473–85.
    OpenUrl
  137. 137.
    Li D, Sun J, Zhang Y, Wang X, Yang S, Harvey C, et al. VYC-20L is Safe and Effective for Improving Volume and Aesthetic Appearance of the Nose in Chinese Adults. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022;15:1195–204.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Posted August 23, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Comprehensive Review of Adverse Effects in Minimally Invasive Cosmetic Procedures: Insights from a Decade of Clinical Data
Cristina Guadalupe Beltrán Muñoz, Elissa Bracamontes Perez, Fernanda Corrales Bay, Aimee Adriana Barajas Nieto, Kate Georgette Rojo Navarro
medRxiv 2024.08.23.24312506; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.23.24312506
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area