Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A theoretical framework to quantify the tradeoff between individual and population benefits of expanded antibiotic use

Cormac R. LaPrete, Sharia M. Ahmed, Damon J.A. Toth, Jody R. Reimer, Valerie M. Vaughn, Frederick R. Adler, Lindsay T. Keegan
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.28.24312731
Cormac R. LaPrete
1Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sharia M. Ahmed
2Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Damon J.A. Toth
2Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jody R. Reimer
1Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
3School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valerie M. Vaughn
4Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frederick R. Adler
1Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
3School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lindsay T. Keegan
2Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lindsay.keegan{at}utah.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The use of antibiotics during a disease outbreak presents a critical tradeoff between immediate treatment benefits to the individual and the long-term risk to the population. Typically, the extensive use of antibiotics has been thought to increase selective pressures, leading to resistance. This study explores scenarios where expanded antibiotic treatment can be advantageous for both individual and population health. We develop a mathematical framework to assess the impacts on outbreak dynamics of choosing to treat moderate infections not treated under current guidelines, focusing on cholera as a case study. We derive conditions under which treating moderate infections can sufficiently decrease transmission and reduce the total number of antibiotic doses administered. We identify two critical thresholds: the Outbreak Prevention Threshold (OPT), where expanded treatment reduces the reproductive number below 1 and halts transmission, and the Dose Utilization Threshold (DUT), where expanded treatment results in fewer total antibiotic doses used than under current guidelines. For cholera, we find that treating moderate infections can feasibly stop an outbreak when the untreated reproductive number is less than 1.424 and will result in fewer does used compared to current guidelines when the untreated reproductive number is less than 1.533. These findings demonstrate that conditions exist under which expanding treatment to include moderate infections can reduce disease spread and the selective pressure for antibiotic resistance. These findings extend to other pathogens and outbreak scenarios, suggesting potential targets for optimized treatment strategies that balance public health benefits and antibiotic stewardship.

Competing Interest Statement

CRL, DJAT, FRA, LTK acknowledge funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) TRANSMIT: Training Research Acumen in Students Modeling Infectious Threats (Grant #1U01CK000675). SMA, DJAT, LTK acknowledge funding from the CDC Centers for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics (CFA) (Grant #1NU38FT000009-01-00). VMV acknowledges funding from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (Grant #5K08HS026530-06). The authors thank Daniel Leung, Andrew Azman, and Iza Ciglenecki for helpful discussions about framing the research project.

Funding Statement

CRL, DJAT, FRA, LTK acknowledge funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) TRANSMIT: Training Research Acumen in Students Modeling Infectious Threats (Grant #1U01CK000675). SMA, DJAT, LTK acknowledge funding from the CDC Centers for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics (CFA) (Grant #1NU38FT000009-01-00). VMV acknowledges funding from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (Grant #5K08HS026530-06).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Statements and Declarations Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data Availability

No data is produced in this study and all code produced is available online at: https://github.com/UT-IDDynamics/Cholera_Threshold.

https://github.com/UT-IDDynamics/Cholera_Threshold

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 28, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A theoretical framework to quantify the tradeoff between individual and population benefits of expanded antibiotic use
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A theoretical framework to quantify the tradeoff between individual and population benefits of expanded antibiotic use
Cormac R. LaPrete, Sharia M. Ahmed, Damon J.A. Toth, Jody R. Reimer, Valerie M. Vaughn, Frederick R. Adler, Lindsay T. Keegan
medRxiv 2024.08.28.24312731; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.28.24312731
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A theoretical framework to quantify the tradeoff between individual and population benefits of expanded antibiotic use
Cormac R. LaPrete, Sharia M. Ahmed, Damon J.A. Toth, Jody R. Reimer, Valerie M. Vaughn, Frederick R. Adler, Lindsay T. Keegan
medRxiv 2024.08.28.24312731; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.28.24312731

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)