Abstract
In a globalised world, understanding acculturation—the process by which individuals adapt to new cultural environments—is crucial, especially in multicultural societies. The East Asian Acculturation Measure (EAAM), rooted in Berry’s acculturation model, has been extensively used to assess acculturation strategies among East Asian populations in the United States. However, its application to other cultural groups remains limited due to its specificity. This study aims to adapt and validate the EAAM for broader applicability across diverse cultural contexts, particularly among populations outside the East Asian demographic.
The study involved 819 international students in Germany and South Africa from 112 countries. It was conducted in two phases: the first included 490 and 329 in the second. The psychometric properties of the EAAM were evaluated through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). Initial CFA results showed that the original four-factor model did not adequately fit the diverse sample, prompting further EFA, which revealed a more suitable five-factor structure. This new structure termed the Shortened Adapted Acculturation Scale (SAAS), comprises five dimensions: Social Disconnection, Cultural Adaptation, Social Perception, Interpersonal Comfort, and Language Integration. The SAAS demonstrated high internal consistency and reliability across all factors, with significant evidence of measurement invariance across genders.
The findings emphasise the importance of culturally adapting psychological measures to ensure validity and reliability across diverse populations. The SAAS offers a robust tool for assessing acculturation beyond East Asian contexts, providing valuable insights into the complexities of cultural adaptation. The study’s outcomes contribute significantly to the field of cross-cultural psychology and highlight the need for continued research on acculturation processes in an increasingly diverse world.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Friedrich Schiller University Jena Ethics Committee (FSV 23/049) and North-West University BaSSREC (NWU-01085-22-S7-01)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Footnotes
Erhabor.idemudia{at}nwu.ac.za
constance.karing{at}uni-jena.de
Law.ugwu{at}gmail.com
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
