Abstract
Background Sensitive clinical surveillance and high vaccination coverage are required to meet the WHO 2030 measles elimination target. Whilst wastewater and environmental surveillance (WES) has proven usefulness in polio surveillance, it has not been applied to measles control. We describe the development of digital RT-PCR (RT-dPCR) for detection and quantification of measles virus (MeV) in wastewater, and application to retained concentrated samples obtained from 28 national sentinel SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance sites and 19 localised collection points in a single province before, during and after a measles outbreak of over 2,000 laboratory-confirmed cases.
Methods We validated a RT-dPCR assay incorporating WHO-recommended primers for detection and differentiation of wild-type and vaccine genotypes. We applied this to retained wastewater samples concentrated by ultrafiltration and stored at −20°C. We compared wastewater findings by district and epidemiological weeks with laboratory-confirmed measles case data obtained from national fever-rash surveillance for districts with adequate surveillance indicators (>2/100,000 non-measles cases)
Findings Amongst 2,149 wastewater concentrates obtained between 16 February 2021 and 08 March 2024, we identified 43 (2%) samples containing MeV RNA in concentrations ranging from 2,04-6,11 genome copies/mL. MeV genotype A (vaccine strain) was co-detected in wastewater in 6 instances along with non-A (wild-type) genotypes. Comparison of wastewater and clinical fever-rash surveillance data by epidemiological week and district identified 27 district-time instances where at least one positive wastewater sample was identified, of which 14 (52%) districts reported at least one laboratory-confirmed clinical case in that same epidemiological week. Amongst districts with positive wastewater samples, wastewater surveillance detected MeV in 13/27 (48%) time-district pairs when clinical surveillance failed to detect cases. Amongst district-time instances where at least one laboratory-confirmed measles case was detected (N=127), MeV was detected in at least one wastewater sample collected in that same epidemiological week in 14 (11%) districts
Interpretation Wastewater surveillance may be a useful complementary surveillance tool for identification of districts with ongoing measles circulation. MeV detection rates may be improved by real-time testing to limit RNA degradation and improved concentration and nucleic acid extraction processes. Ongoing wastewater surveillance for MeV should be conducted in order to understand the role of WES in measles control and elimination.
Funding This work was funded by BMGF (INV-049271)
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Yes
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The protocol for this study was reviewed and approved by the University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee (MM220904). Clinical data were analysed anonymously
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
