Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Improving research transparency with individualized report cards: A feasibility study in clinical trials at a large university medical center

View ORCID ProfileDelwen L. Franzen, View ORCID ProfileMaia Salholz-Hillel, View ORCID ProfileStephanie Müller-Ohlraun, View ORCID ProfileDaniel Strech
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.10.24302619
Delwen L. Franzen
1Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, QUEST Center for Responsible Research, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Delwen L. Franzen
  • For correspondence: delwen.franzen{at}bih-charite.de maia.salholz-hillel{at}bih-charite.de
Maia Salholz-Hillel
1Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, QUEST Center for Responsible Research, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Maia Salholz-Hillel
  • For correspondence: delwen.franzen{at}bih-charite.de maia.salholz-hillel{at}bih-charite.de
Stephanie Müller-Ohlraun
1Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, QUEST Center for Responsible Research, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephanie Müller-Ohlraun
Daniel Strech
1Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, QUEST Center for Responsible Research, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daniel Strech
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Data Availability

All the code generated in this study is openly available under an open license in GitHub: https://github.com/quest-bih/trackvalue. Data collection was conducted in Python [Version 3.9] and R [Version 4.3.2], and all analysis was conducted in R. This manuscript was written by interleaving regular prose and analysis code in Quarto [Version 1.4.549]. With the exception of investigator contact information and survey comments and corrections, all the data is openly available in the GitHub repository of the project and Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10467054.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10467054

https://github.com/quest-bih/trackvalue

Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 23, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improving research transparency with individualized report cards: A feasibility study in clinical trials at a large university medical center
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Improving research transparency with individualized report cards: A feasibility study in clinical trials at a large university medical center
Delwen L. Franzen, Maia Salholz-Hillel, Stephanie Müller-Ohlraun, Daniel Strech
medRxiv 2024.02.10.24302619; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.10.24302619
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Improving research transparency with individualized report cards: A feasibility study in clinical trials at a large university medical center
Delwen L. Franzen, Maia Salholz-Hillel, Stephanie Müller-Ohlraun, Daniel Strech
medRxiv 2024.02.10.24302619; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.10.24302619

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Medical Ethics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)