Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Comparison of student perception and exam validity, reliability and items difficulty: cross-sectional study

View ORCID ProfileAssad Ali Rezigalla, Ali Mohammed Elhassan Eleragi, Masoud Ishag Elkhalifa, Ammar M A Mohammed
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19002535
Assad Ali Rezigalla
1Department of Basic medical sciences, College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha 61922, P.O. Box 551, Saudi Arabia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Assad Ali Rezigalla
  • For correspondence: assadkafe{at}yahoo.com
Ali Mohammed Elhassan Eleragi
1Department of Basic medical sciences, College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha 61922, P.O. Box 551, Saudi Arabia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masoud Ishag Elkhalifa
2Department of Medical education, College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha 61922, P.O. Box 551, Saudi Arabia.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ammar M A Mohammed
3Department of Basic medical sciences, College of applied medical sciences. University of Shaqra, KSA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Student perception of an exam is a reflection of their feelings towards the exam items, while item analysis is a statistical analysis of students’ responses to exam items. The study was formulated to compare the student’s perception of the results of item analysis.

Material and methods Type of the study is cross-sectional. The study was conducted in the college of medicine, in the duration from January to April 2019. The study uses a structured questionnaire and standardized item analysis of students’ exam. Participants are students registered for semester two level year (2018-2019). Exclusion criteria included all students who refused to participate in the study or do not fill the questionnaire.

Result The response rate of the questionnaire was 88.9% (40/45). Students considered the exam as easy (70.4%). The average difficulty index of the exam is acceptable. KR-20 of the exam was 0.906. A significant correlation was reported between student perceptions towards exam difficulty and standard exam difficulty.

Discussion Student perceptions support the evidances of exam vlaitdity. Students can estimate exam difficulty.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No fund

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

Any clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.

Not Applicable

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data will be available upon request to the corresponding author.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 09, 2019.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of student perception and exam validity, reliability and items difficulty: cross-sectional study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comparison of student perception and exam validity, reliability and items difficulty: cross-sectional study
Assad Ali Rezigalla, Ali Mohammed Elhassan Eleragi, Masoud Ishag Elkhalifa, Ammar M A Mohammed
medRxiv 19002535; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19002535
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Comparison of student perception and exam validity, reliability and items difficulty: cross-sectional study
Assad Ali Rezigalla, Ali Mohammed Elhassan Eleragi, Masoud Ishag Elkhalifa, Ammar M A Mohammed
medRxiv 19002535; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/19002535

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Medical Education
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)