ABSTRACT
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors have brought hope for patients with advanced lung cancer, among which PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors have achieved considerable results. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 combined with CTLA-4 antibodies in patients with advanced lung cancer.
Materials and Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) study of PD-1/PD-L1 combined with CTLA-4 inhibitors for advanced lung cancer was searched in the database for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Results The meta-analysis finally included 4 trials (actually 3 trials), and the results showed that the overall response rate of PD-1/PD-L1 combined with CTLA-4 inhibitor was higher than that of the control group (ORR = 2.29 [95% CI 1.58 3.32], P <0.0001). PFS significantly improved compared with conventional treatment (HR = 0.69 [95% CI 0.56, 0.85], P = 0.0005), which was statistically significant. OS also improved but did not statistically significant (HR = 0.80 [95% CI 0.61, 1.05], P = 0.11). PD-1/PD-L1 combined with CTLA-4 inhibitors had a higher incidence of adverse reactions than conventional treatment (OR = 1.72 [95% CI 0.59, 5.09], P = 0.33), but the incidence of grade≥3 AEs was lower than the control group (OR = 0.96 [95% CI 0.64, 1.44], P = 0.85).
Conclusion Double checkpoint inhibitor PD-1/PD-L1 combined with CTLA-4 antibody has synergistic anti-cancer activity and improved ORR and PFS in lung cancer. Adverse reactions are more common than conventional treatment, but are generally controllable. Therefore, PD-1/PD-L1 combined with CTLA-4 inhibitors provides a beacon for the treatment of advanced lung cancer, which has guiding significance for the treatment selection in the future.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
No data are available.
