ABSTRACT
Background Numerous studies have shown gender-based similarity affects interactions in organizational contexts. However, studies in the health care arena have shown contradictory findings.
Objective To explore gender homophily in an inter-professional network comprising doctors and nurses across the primary and secondary care interface in diabetes care.
Methods A Social Network Analysis was conducted with primary and secondary care clinicians responsible for diabetes care in Auckland New Zealand. Three different methods were used to test gender affinity in 40 health professionals (GPs, endocrinologist and specialist nurses). First, a metric analysis of homophily ranking corrected for potential differences in gender proportions was conducted. Homophily ranking is scored between −1 (perfect heterophily) and 1 (perfect homophily). We also examined the ego-net composition and measured the density of interactions among men and women in the network.
Results Gender homophily was close to 0, indicated that network members were likely to interact with males and females without preferences, a result that was confirmed through ego-net composition.
Conclusions This study in diabetes managed care network found little evidence to support the impact of gender homophily on communication exchange. This contrasts with other studies in the health care context. Other influences need to be explored at this context.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received for this research
Author Declarations
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.
Yes
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
No data is available
