Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Automatic Identification of Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Exercise Type and Dose Using Body-Worn Sensors and Machine Learning: A Pilot Study

Noah Balestra, Gaurav Sharma, Linda M. Riek, View ORCID ProfileAnia Busza
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.17.20043869
Noah Balestra
1University of Rochester, NY, US
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gaurav Sharma
2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Rochester, NY, US
3Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, NY, US
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda M. Riek
4Department of Physical Therapy, Nazareth College, NY, US
PT, DPT, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ania Busza
5Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, NY, US
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ania Busza
  • For correspondence: ania_busza{at}urmc.rochester.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Stroke is a major cause of adult-onset disability worldwide, and approximately 40% of stroke survivors have residual impairment in upper-extremity function. Prior studies suggest that increased participation in rehabilitation exercises improves motor function post-stroke,1 however further clarification of optimal exercise dose and timing has been limited by the technical challenge of quantifying exercise activities over multiple days. In this exploratory study, we assessed the feasibility of using body-worn sensors to track rehabilitation exercises in the inpatient setting, and investigated which recording parameters and data analysis strategies are sufficient for accurately identifying and counting exercise repetitions. MC10 BioStampRC® sensors were used to measure accelerometry and gyroscopy from arms of healthy controls (n=11) and patients with arm weakness due to recent stroke (n=13) while the subjects performed three pre-selected upper extremity exercises. Sensor data was then labeled by exercise type, and this labeled data set was used to train a machine learning classification algorithm for identifying exercise type. The machine-learning algorithm and a peak-finding algorithm was used to count exercise repetitions in non-labeled data sets. We achieved a repetition counting accuracy of 95.6 ± 2.4 % overall, and 95.0 ± 2.3 % in patients with arm weakness due to stroke. Accuracy was decreased when using fewer sensors or using accelerometry alone. Our exploratory study suggests that body-worn sensor systems are technically feasible, well-tolerated in subjects with recent stroke, and may ultimately be useful for developing a system to measure total exercise “dose” in post-stroke patients during clinical rehabilitation or clinical trials.

Competing Interest Statement

MC10 Inc. provided the sensor equipment (BiostampRC sensors) for this research. However, MC10 Inc. was not involved in the design, analysis, or results of the study in any way.

Funding Statement

AB was supported by the following grants: NRSA 2T32NS007338-16 (NIH) and the NTRAIN K12 program (NIH/NICHD 1K12 HD093427-01). This project is also supported by a pilot grant from the University of Rochester CHeT Institute.

Author Declarations

All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.

Yes

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Sensor data for this paper will be made available via request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 22, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Automatic Identification of Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Exercise Type and Dose Using Body-Worn Sensors and Machine Learning: A Pilot Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Automatic Identification of Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Exercise Type and Dose Using Body-Worn Sensors and Machine Learning: A Pilot Study
Noah Balestra, Gaurav Sharma, Linda M. Riek, Ania Busza
medRxiv 2020.04.17.20043869; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.17.20043869
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Automatic Identification of Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Exercise Type and Dose Using Body-Worn Sensors and Machine Learning: A Pilot Study
Noah Balestra, Gaurav Sharma, Linda M. Riek, Ania Busza
medRxiv 2020.04.17.20043869; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.17.20043869

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)