Abstract
Background Dystonia diagnosis is subjective and often difficult, particularly when co-morbid with spasticity as occurs in cerebral palsy.
Objective To develop an objective clinical screening method for dystonia
Methods We analyzed 30 gait videos (640×360 pixel resolution, 30 frames/second) of subjects with spastic cerebral palsy acquired during routine clinic visits. Dystonia was identified by consensus of three movement disorders specialists (15 videos with and 15 without dystonia). Limb position was calculated using deep neural network-guided pose estimation (DeepLabCut) to determine inter-knee distance variance, foot angle variance, and median foot angle difference between limbs.
Results All gait variables were significant predictors of dystonia. An inter-knee distance variance greater than 14 pixels together with a median foot angle difference greater than 10 degrees yielded 93% sensitivity and specificity for dystonia.
Conclusions Open-source automated video gait analysis can identify features of expert-identified dystonia. Methods like this could help clinically screen for dystonia.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding supporting this work is from the National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (5K12NS098482-02).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was granted Human Subjects Research approval from the Washington University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data will be made available to qualified investigators upon request.
