Abstract
Electronic Health Records (EHRs) often lack reliable annotation of patient medical conditions. Yu et al. recently proposed PheNorm, an automated unsupervised algorithm to identify patient medical conditions from EHR data. PheVis extends PheNorm at the visit resolution. PheVis combines diagnosis codes together with medical concepts extracted from medical notes, incorporating past history in a machine learning approach to provide an interpretable “white box” predictor of the occurrence probability for a given medical condition at each visit. PheVis is applied to two real-world use-cases using the datawarehouse of the University Hospital of Bordeaux: i) rheumatoid arthritis, a chronic condition; ii) tuberculosis, an acute condition (cross-validated AUROC were respectively 0.947 [0.944; 0.948] and 0.987 [0.983; 0.990]). PheVis performs well for chronic conditions, though absence of exclusion of past medical history by natural language processing tools limits its performance in French for acute conditions. It achieves significantly better performance than state-of-the-art methods especially for chronic diseases.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Study was funded by CHU de Bordeaux.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
No IRB.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
CRediT: Thomas Ferté: Methodology, Formal analysis, writing – Original draft, Sébastien Cossin: Supervision, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review, Thierry Schaeverbeke: Conceptualisation, writing – review, Thomas Barnetche: Conceptualisation, writing – review, Vianney Jouhet and Boris P Hejblum: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, writing – review
Manuscript updated with comparison of methods Pseudo-code of the algorithm added
Data Availability
Data were provided by the CHU de Bordeaux.
