Abstract
Background Patients treated in hand surgery (HS) belong to different demographic groups and have varying impairments related to different pathologies. HS outcomes are measured to assess treatment results, complication risks and intervention reliability. A one-dimensional and linear measure would allow for unbiased comparisons of manual ability between patients and different treatment effects.
Objective To adapt the ABILHAND questionnaire through Rasch analysis for specific use in HS patients and to examine its validity.
Methods A preliminary 90-item questionnaire was presented to 216 patients representing the diagnoses most frequently encountered in HS, including distal radius fracture (n=74), basal thumb arthritis (n=66), carpal tunnel syndrome (n=53), and heavy wrist surgery (n=23). Patients were assessed during the early recovery and in the late follow-up period (0-3 months, 3-6 months and >6 months), leading to a total of 305 assessments. They rated their perceived difficulty with queried activities as impossible, difficult, or easy. Responses were analyzed using the RUMM2030 software. Items were refined based on item-patient targeting, fit statistics, differential item functioning, local independence and item redundancy. Patients also completed the QuickDASH, 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12) and a numerical pain scale.
Results The rating scale Rasch model was used to select 23 mostly bimanual items on a 3-level scale, which constitute a unidimensional, linear measure of manual ability with good reliability across all included diagnostic groups (Person-Separation Index = 0.90). The resulting scale was found to be invariant across demographic and clinical subgroups and over time. ABILHAND-HS patient measures correlated significantly (p<0.001) with the QuickDASH (r=-0.77), SF-12 Physical Component Summary (r=0.56), SF-12 Mental Component Summary (r=0.31), and pain scale (r=-0.49).
Conclusion ABILHAND-HS is a robust person-centered measure of manual ability in HS patients.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a grant from the FRIA (Fonds pour la formation a la recherche dans l industrie et l agriculture) and the Louvain Bionics (Incentive Grant 2018). The funding source had no role in study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical committee of Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc/Université catholique de Louvain
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Minor changes throughout the entire manuscript. "Statistical analyses" section added. Table 4 added. Study limitations were added in the discussion. Supplementary files updated.
Data Availability
The data in the study is based on patient material, and since there are many individual variables, there is a possibility that patients might be identified due to their comorbidities, patient characteristics and time of encounter. The study participants have not provided consent to publicly share the individual level data underlying this study. To ensure adherence to guidelines for the protection of data derived from human subjects, the patients records of this study as well as individual responses to the questionnaire can be obtained upon request to the ethical committee of Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, with contact information commission.ethique-saintluc{at}uclouvain.be, after identification of the applicant and justification of the demand.
