A student made MOOC for medical students during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

INTRODUCTION

Latin America was one of the last regions of the world to become affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, when it happened its different governments started implementing measures of hygiene, social distancing and quarantine that affected almost every aspect of the lives of their inhabitants. One of these aspects was the education. Every country of the region took action on the matter and the restrictions ranged from the complete suspension of the classroom classes to the implementation of virtual technologies and strategies to continue with its academic programs.¹ This opened a great opportunity to discover and innovate in virtual education. One of these innovative tools for virtual education are the massive open online courses (MOOCs) which are often free of charge² and can reach massive, as its name implies, amounts of people, the most popular MOOC had reached more than 2.5 millions of people for very diverse backgrounds.³ This technology had also been implemented in formal medical education curriculums^4–6 and even the world health organization (WHO) had taken advantage of this technology to give knowledge and reach a vast amount of healthcare professionals and students in times of the new coronavirus disease of 2019⁷ (COVID-19). These video based courses are not only specially relevant and useful in this time where quarantines and virtual education had become the new normality for many medical students but also had been proved to be equally effective when compared to live lecture courses.⁸

The International League against epilepsy (ILAE) in 2014 created the epilepsy education task force with the objective to create a web-based virtual campus to teach about epilepsy on a competence-based approach, this goal has not been reached yet but they had published what they consider should be the learning domains that should be teach in epilepsy⁹ for healthcare professionals involved in the care of people with epilepsy. Using these domains proposed by the ILAE a MOOC on epilepsy was made for Latin American healthcare students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

MATERIALS OR PATIENTS AND METHODS

The MOOC

A Seven week MOOC about the principles on diagnosis and management of epilepsy was made using free platforms and software. The MOOC was divided into 5 main topics, see Table 1, based on a competence-based curriculum in epileptology published previously by the ILAE.⁹ Each lecture consisted of a topic review presented with PowerPoint slides with the lecturer voice-over and freehand drawings using a digital tablet, see Figure 1. Each lecture was presented via YouTube live and the recorded lecture was then upload to the Google classroom were the MOOC was hosted. The screen recording and broadcast through YouTube was made using Open Broadcaster Software, an open and free software. In Google classroom during the seven weeks the MOOC lasted, all the students had access to the lectures recordings, the scientific articles used in the topic review a forum and a five question review test for each lecture; the tests were made using Google forms. All the previously mentioned Google products are free to use.

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup
• Download powerpoint

Table 1.

Epilepsy MOOC schedule.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.

Lecturer drawing over a PowerPoint slide used in the MOOC also known as the khan-style lecture production.

RESULTS

A Total of 250 healthcare students signed up in the epilepsy MOOC, the demographic characteristics of the participants are summarized in the table 2, from a total of 8 different Latin American countries, see Figure 2. From these 250 participants only 43 (17.2%) of them had previously participated in other MOOCs. After the completion of the MOOC, when asked about the length of the lectures of the MOOC 94% of the participants who finished the MOOC said they had an optimal Length, see Figure 3, and 98.3% of them agreed that they would participate in future MOOCs in the future. This epilepsy MOOC had a completion rate of 37.2% for a total of 93 participants.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2.

Heat map Showing the countries of origin of the participants of the MOOC.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3.

Opinion upon the lecture length from the participants which finished the MOOC.

DISCUSSION

Student-made content for students are not novel, nevertheless with the implementation of Information and communications technologies this content can reach more than the author’s own cohort and it can break gaps that were unbreakable before. The geographical distance can be shortened and high quality resources can be accessible for almost anyone with an internet connected device.¹⁰ MOOCs are part of these technologies it was introduced in 2008 as a concept by Cormier and Alexander and it has become an immensely popular tool since then.¹¹ This Experience making a peer teach epilepsy MOOC it’s an important statement on how Latin American students which are usually a hard population to reach with conventional MOOC technologies^10,12 are indeed reachable and open to learn using this tool. One of the main determinants that acts as a barrier to the implementation of MOOCs in Latin American countries is the language barrier, this is perfectly shown in the report of the data from a WHO MOOC on COVID-19 the main source of enrolments were in their Spanish version of the MOOC,⁷ this show how you can reach this population if you break this barrier; this is also shown here, this epilepsy MOOC was given entirely in Spanish as a result only two students from brazil signed up, this two students lived in border cities with Spanish speaking countries so they spoke Spanish as a second language and overcame this barrier.

This MOOC had a completion rate of 37.2% this may seem low at a first glance but MOOCs are known to have low completion rates having a averages of completion rates of less than 10% and as low as 6,5%.^13–14 Our success may be due to two main factors one of them is that we gave free certificates for those who finished the MOOC and the second one could be the methodology: first the khan-style production style was used in this MOOC, Khan-style consist in a full screen video with the lecturer drawing freehand on a digital tablet, this method had shown more engagement from students compared with other methods of lecture production like having PowerPoint slides only.¹⁵ The second methodological aspect that may have had a positive impact on the completion rate may be the self-spacing nature of this MOOC, students could revisit any topic at any time as long as it was in the 7 week period the MOOC was open this has shown better results and it’s associated with better learning.¹⁶ And the third methodological aspect of this MOOC that may had had a positive influence in the completion rate is the length of the lectures; the length of the lectures in this MOOC was in average of 52 minutes this is unconventional for MOOCs and it’s a statement that may contradict previous findings that show otherwise.¹⁵ However 94% of the students who finished this MOOC affirmed that the lecture length was optimal. This result may be biased because we only use the data of those who finished the MOOC which may be more pleased with the MOOC in comparison with those who dropped from the MOOC without finishing it.

Only the 17.2% of the participants in this MOOC had previously participated in other MOOCs but when asked to the students who finished the course if they would participate in MOOCs again 98.9% of them said they would. This can show us that when breaking the barriers that keep the gaps for Latin American Students to acquire knowledge trough MOOCs we can start building a MOOC-participative culture in them.

In conclusion MOOCs can be easily implemented as a powerful pedagogic strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic and can have a positive impact not only in in its proposed learning objectives but it can help closing the gap that prevent Latin American healthcare students to acquire actively knowledge trough them.

Financing

The author did not receive any funding for the making of this paper

Conflict of interest statement by authors

The author declares no conflict of interest

Compliance with ethical standards

The participants of this study signed a digital informed consent and only the data from the participants who agreed their data to be used is shown in this manuscript.

Authors Contribution Statement