Abstract
New York City’s Health Department developed a SARS-CoV-2 percent test positivity cluster detection system using census tract resolution and the SaTScan prospective space-time scan statistic. One cluster led to identifying a gathering with inadequate social distancing where viral transmission likely occurred, and another cluster prompted targeted community testing and outreach.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
S.K.G. and E.R.P were supported by the Public Health Emergency Preparedness Cooperative Agreement (grant NU90TP922035-01), funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Department of Health and Human Services.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This work was deemed public health surveillance that is nonresearch by the Institutional Review Board of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
(1) Corrected interpretation of statistical significance of reported clusters. As a result of the workaround described in the Technical Appendix to accommodate a rapidly changing trend, in version 1, we inadvertently misinterpreted a cluster with a recurrence interval of 1.0 days (not statistically significant) as having a recurrence interval of 1.0 years (statistically significant); (2) Updated text to further demonstrate application of results to support applied public health practice.
Data Availability
Data at high spatiotemporal resolution are not publicly available in accordance with patient confidentiality and privacy laws. Publicly available data are linked below.
