Abstract
Testosterone is a naturally occurring hormone that has been positively associated with lean mass and strength in males. Whether endogenous testosterone is related to lean mass and strength in females is unknown.
Objective To examine the relationship between endogenous testosterone concentration and lean mass and handgrip strength in healthy, pre-menopausal females.
Methods Secondary data from the 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)were used. Females were aged 18-40 (n=753, age 30 ± 6 yr, mean ± SD) and pre-menopausal. Multivariate linear regression models were used to examine associations between total testosterone, height-adjusted lean mass and handgrip strength.
Results Mean ± SD testosterone concentration was 1.0 ± 0.6 nmol·L-1 and mean free androgen index (FAI) was 0.02 ± 0.02. Mean fat-free mass index (FFMI) was 16.4 ± 3.0 kg·m-2 and mean handgrip strength was 61.7 ± 10.5 kg. In females, testosterone was not associated with FFMI (β=0.08; 95%CI: −0.02, 0.18; p=0.11) or handgrip strength (β=0.03; 95%CI: −0.11, 0.17; p=0.67) in a statistically significant manner. Conversely, FAI was positively associated with FFMI (β=0.17; 95%CI: 0.01, 0.33; p=0.04) but not handgrip strength (β=0.19; 95%CI: −0.02, 0.21; p=0.10).
Conclusions These findings indicate that FAI, but not total testosterone, is associated with FFMI in females. The small coefficients however suggest that FAI only accounts for a minor proportion of the variance in FFMI, highlighting the complexity of the regulation of lean mass in female physiology. FAI nor total testosterone are associated with handgrip strength in females when testosterone concentrations are not altered pharmacologically.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
SA is supported by the Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP). No other funding was received as part of this project.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (DUHREC) exempted this study from ethics review.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
This manuscript uses freely available data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from the 2013-2104 cycle.
