Abstract
Objective Epidemiologic studies have reported inconsistent findings about the association between sleep duration and metabolic syndrome. We aimed to clarify this association by method of metaanalysis.
Methods Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases were searched from inception to May 2020. We collected data from 235,895 participants from 9 prospective cohort studies, and 340,492 participants from 26 cross-sectional studies. Risk ratios (RR) or odds ratios (OR) were calculated separately for cohort studies and cross-sectional studies, through meta-analysis of adjusted data from individual studies.
Results For cohort studies, short sleep duration was associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25). Long sleep duration was not associated with new onset metabolic syndrome (RR, 1.02, 0.85-1.18). For cross-sectional studies, both short (OR, 1.12, 95% CI, 1.08-1.18) and long (OR, 1.06, 1.01-1.11) sleep duration was associated with high prevalence of metabolic syndrome.
Conclusions Only short sleep duration was associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome. Future studies should address whether the association is casual and modifiable.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is a meta-analysis.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
1, Author affilliations updated. 2, Little error corrected. No data was changed
Data Availability
This is a meta-analysis
