Sleep Duration and the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Jianian Hua, Hezi Jiang, Qi Fang
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.30.20184747

Abstract

Objective Epidemiologic studies have reported inconsistent findings about the association between sleep duration and metabolic syndrome. We aimed to clarify this association by method of metaanalysis.

Methods Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases were searched from inception to May 2020. We collected data from 235,895 participants from 9 prospective cohort studies, and 340,492 participants from 26 cross-sectional studies. Risk ratios (RR) or odds ratios (OR) were calculated separately for cohort studies and cross-sectional studies, through meta-analysis of adjusted data from individual studies.

Results For cohort studies, short sleep duration was associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25). Long sleep duration was not associated with new onset metabolic syndrome (RR, 1.02, 0.85-1.18). For cross-sectional studies, both short (OR, 1.12, 95% CI, 1.08-1.18) and long (OR, 1.06, 1.01-1.11) sleep duration was associated with high prevalence of metabolic syndrome.

Conclusions Only short sleep duration was associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome. Future studies should address whether the association is casual and modifiable.

1 Introduction

Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of disorders that occur together, and it is defined as a condition consisting of at least three of the following: hypertension, high blood sugar, excessive waist circumference, higher triglyceride (TG) levels or low high-density cholesterol (HDL) levels. Metabolic syndrome is associated with adverse cardiovascular events, even after adjusted for diabetes and obesity1,2. Meanwhile, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in America is up to 33%3. Recently, growing concern has been paid to the modifiable risk factors of metabolic syndrome4.

Abnormal sleep duration is known to increase the risk of a serious health outcomes, including mortality, diabetes and cardiovascular disease5,6. Therefore, both sleep and metabolic syndrome increase the risk of cardiovascular event. However, whether abnormal sleep duration increase the risk of metabolic syndrome remained controversial. Several meta-analyses have reported the association between sleep duration and metabolic syndrome7-9. However, none of the studies assessed the association in a prospective cohort design, which has less substantial bias could provide stronger support for causality6,10,11.

Therefore, we conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to: (1) examine all prospective cohort studies that have assessed the effect of sleep duration on the future risk of metabolic syndrome; (2) conduct an updated meta-analysis to examine the cross-sectional association.

2 Materials and Methods

We performed this study according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalysis (PRISMA) guidelines (Table S1).

Two independent researchers (JNH and HZJ) separately assessed the eligibility, extracted data, and checked the quality of the included studies. Any disagreement in screening the articles were resolved through discussion between these two, with adjudication by a third research (QF) if disagreements persisted.

2.1 Search strategy

A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO from inception to May 2020. We used the following search terms: (1) “sleep hour” OR “sleeping hour” OR “hours of sleep” OR “sleep duration” OR “sleep time” OR “sleep length” OR “sleep period” OR “sleeping time” OR “sleep span”; (2)“metabolic syndrome” or “MetS” or “MS” or “syndrome X” or “cardiometabolic risk factor” or “insulin resistance syndrome”. Algorithms combining the two sets of search terms were applied.

2.2 Study selection

Studies that examined the relationship between sleep duration and metabolic syndrome were screened for eligibility, without language restriction. The inclusion criteria were: (1) the research was a cohort or a cross-sectional study; (2) the research compared individuals with “unnormal” and “normal” sleep duration on the outcome of metabolic syndrome. If one or more articles reported data from one study, the article with the largest sample size and the best design was included.

We analyzed cohort studies and cross-sectional studies separately in all analysis due to the following reasons. First, cross-sectional study could not establish a causal relationship, and it only reflected the association between sleep duration and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome11. Second, the non-exposed prevalence of metabolic syndrome was higher than 20%12, odds ratios (OR) could not be regarded as risk ratio (RR)13.

The inclusion of studies was conducted in two stages: (1) screening of the title and abstract and (2) screening of the full text.

2.3 Data extraction

The following characteristics were extracted from each eligible study: author name and publication year, study type, study location (country and continent), sample size, participants’ characteristics (age range, mean age and sex composition), exposure and outcome assessment (sleep assessment, metabolic syndrome measures and definition of long or short sleep duration) and main results.

Since definition of sleep duration varies among studies14, the three categories of sleep duration (short, long and normal) was extracted by one of the following two ways. For some papers, sleep duration was already divided into three categories based on cultures and ethnicities. For others, in which sleep duration was divided into more than three groups, short or long sleep duration was defined as the shortest or longest group reported in the article6. With regard to the main results, the adjusted estimates that reflected the most comprehensive control were extracted.

Data were extracted by two investigators (JNH and HZJ) independently. Disagreement in screening the articles was resolved by discussion between the two investigators. Consultation from a third investigator (QF) was acquired if necessary.

2.4 Exposure and outcome measures

With regard to the measurements of nocturnal sleep duration, two studies used objective measurement, while others used interview or questionnaire.

The diagnostic criteria of metabolic syndrome (MetS) varied between studies. 10 studies used the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program’s Adult Treatment Panel III (NECP ATP-III); 4 studies used modified NECP ATP-III; 14 studies used the American Heart Association/National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (AHA-NHLBI); 3 studies used the International Diabetes Federation (IDF)8; 5 studies used other criteria.

2.5 Quality appraisal

The quality of all studies was evaluated by Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS)15. The total score ranged from 0-9 scores. For outcome category and comparability category, all the studies had similar quality. The difference between studies lied in the study design category (Table S3).

2.6 Data analysis

We conducted all the following analysis separately for cohort studies and cross-sectional studies, and for study-specific short and long sleep duration, respectively.

In analysis of cohort studies, hazard ratios (HRs) were regarded as risk ratios (RRs). For studies which provided only odds ratios (ORs), we calculated RRs by using the ORs and control event rates (CERs) in normal sleepers. Using random-effect models, we estimated the pooled RR and 95% CI. With regard to cross-sectional studies, we calculated the pooled OR and 95%CI using random-effect models.

Heterogeneity between the studies was assessed using Cochran Q statistics (P<0.1 indicates statistically significant heterogeneity) and I2 statistic (I2>50% indicates statistically significant heterogeneity)16. To examine publication bias, we used a funnel plot, the Egger regression test, and the Begg and Mazumdar test17,18. “Trim and fill” method was used to adjust the funnel plot, and recalculated the results19,20. Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding one study at a time to test the robustness of the pooled estimates.

Subgroup analysis was conducted to explore the potential heterogeneity among cross-sectional studies. We used z test to compare summary estimates of each subgroups21. Univariate and multivariate meta-regression were used to study the effect of possible influential confounders, such as definition of sleep duration and study quality. For cohort studies, subgroup analysis and metaregression was not performed considering the small number of datasets included in the meta-analysis. All statistical analysis was performed by R-3.4.320 and Stata 15.1 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX).

3 Results

3.1 Search results

The initial electronic search yielded 1140 articles, among which 789 were reviewed by title and abstract. 127 full-texts were retrieved. 35 studies were included in the final analysis (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Flowchart for the included studies.

3.2 Characteristics of study samples

We identified nine prospective cohort studies that examined the association between sleep duration and the incident risk of metabolic syndrome, in a total of 235,895 participants. The sample size ranged from 293 to 162,121. The mean follow-up duration ranged from 2 to 8 years (Table 1).

View this table:
Table 1. Characteristics of cohort studies

Another twenty-six studies were cross-sectional studies, included a total of 340,492 individuals. The sample size ranged from 263 to 88,678 (Table S2).

Table 1 and Table S2 presented the characteristics of the all 35 studies. The individuals all aged above 18 year. The mean (SD) age of the individuals ranged from 31 (8.7) to 67.6 (7.3) years. The studies were conducted in five continents, while many of them were from Asia. The definitions of short or long sleep duration varied between studies. About 75% studies defined “short sleep duration” as 6 or 7 h, and about 80% studies defined “long sleep duration” as 8 or 9 h.

3.3 Primary analysis

3.3.1 Sleep duration and the risk of metabolic syndrome

Compared with moderate sleep duration, short sleep duration was associated with a statistically significant increase in new onset metabolic syndrome, with an RR of 1.15 (95% CI=1.05-1.25, P<0.001, I2=63.6%, N of datasets=11; Figure 2A).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Forest plot of association between sleep duration and the risk of metabolic syndrome

(A) Comparing short sleepers with normal sleepers; (B) Comparing long sleepers with normal sleepers.

Compared with moderate sleep duration, the association between long sleep duration and risk of metabolic syndrome was not statistically significant, with an RR of 1.02 (95% CI=0.85-1.18, P=0.491, I2=38.0%, N=9; Figure 2B), using random effect model. The RR reduced to 0.94 (95% CI=0.89-0.99, P=0.050, I2=38.0%, N=9), using fixed effect model.

Among the seven studies that examined the effect of long sleep duration, six did not observe a significant association. Only Li X. found that long sleep duration increased the risk of metabolic syndrome among men (adjusted HR=1.96, 95% CI=1.35-2.85).

3.3.2 Sleep duration and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome

Compared with moderate sleepers, people with short or long sleep duration had a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome. The pooled OR of metabolic syndrome in short sleepers compared to moderate sleepers was 1.06 (95% CI=1.01-1.11, P<0.001, I2=66.5%, N=32; Figure 3A). The pooled OR of metabolic syndrome in long sleepers compared to moderate sleepers was 1.11 (95% CI=1.04-1.17, P<0.001, I2=73.8%, N=31; Figure 3B).

Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Forest plot of association between sleep duration and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome

(A) Comparing short sleepers with normal sleepers; (B) Comparing long sleepers with normal sleepers.

3.4 Possible publication bias for primary analysis

Results of Begg and Mazumdar and Egger test were shown in Table S4. No significant publication bias was observed. “Trim and fill” test indicated that the primary results was still significant after the missing studies were filled in (Table S5). Visual inspection of the funnel plots also did not reveal apparent publication bias (Figures not shown).

3.5 Subgroup analysis

Subgroup analysis of the cross-sectional studies were shown in Table 2. No significant subgroup difference was found for gender, continent, and definition of abnormal sleep duration. There were statistically significant subgroup effects (P<0.05 for heterogeneity between groups). For short sleepers, the specific domains were study population, sleep measurement, measures of metabolic syndrome and sample size. For long sleepers, the specific domains were sleep measurement, long sleep duration, measures of metabolic syndrome, sample size, and study quality. However, there was still unexplained heterogeneity within some subgroups. Therefore, the subgroup couldn’t fully explain the overall heterogeneity.

View this table:
Table 2. Subgroup meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies

For short sleepers, hospital-based participants had a higher OR than the community-based. With regard to definition of short sleep duration, there was a tendency that lower duration was associated with higher OR. Nevertheless, the P value was not significant.

For long sleepers, compared with “NECP” group, “modified-NECP” group had higher OR. Studies with more participants or higher quality had lower OR.

3.6 Sensitivity analysis

None of the sensitivity analysis substantially altered the effect of both long and short sleep duration on metabolic syndrome (Figure S1).

3.7 Meta-regression

With regard to cross-sectional studies, a multivariate meta-regression analysis (Table 3) was conducted to examine the potential influence of different factors on the natural logarithm of the OR of short or long sleep duration with prevalence of MetS. For short sleepers, shorter definition of duration was associated with higher OR (P=0.011 for multivariable test, and P=0.099 for univariable test). Higher study quality was associated with lower OR (P=0.010 for univariable test and P=0.033 for multivariable test). The effect of mean age was significant. However, the clinical effect (coef=-0.01) was little. For long sleepers, none of the study factors was significant.

View this table:
Table 3. Results of meta-regression analysis of cross-sectional studies

4 Discussion

To our knowledge, this was the first meta-analysis on the association between sleep duration and the risk of metabolic syndrome. Our study indicated that short sleep duration correlated with an increase in the risk of metabolic syndrome. Long duration was not statistically associated with the risk of metabolic syndrome. With regard to cross-sectional studies, both short and long sleep duration was associated with higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome.

Our results differed from that of three previous meta-analysis, which reported the association between sleep duration and metabolic syndrome. Limited by sample size, the three studies did not distinguish cross-sectional studies and cohort studies in the main outcome. Ju 2013 and Iftikhar 2015 reported only short sleep duration was associated with metabolic syndrome7,8, while Xi 2014 linked both short and long sleep duration to metabolic syndrome9. Moreover, we observed narrower confidence intervals, which might be due to our higher number of included datasets. Nowadays, a growing number of articles reported an inverted-U shaped association between sleep duration and health outcomes, including metabolic syndrome22. Our findings suggested that long sleep duration might have no effect.

Compared with the previous studies, we further conducted comprehensive sub-group analysis and meta-regression for cross-sectional studies. In subgroup analysis, using z test, we found no statistically significant differences in subgroups of sex, continent, and sleep measurement. For short sleepers, hospital-based participants had a higher prevalence than community-based participants, which was consistent with a previous meta-analysis. One possible reason was that people in hospital had poor health conditions. The results of subgroup analysis and meta-regression showed that studies with high quality or larger sample size had smaller risk estimates. In multivariable meta-regression, shorter sleep duration was linearly associated with higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome. Longer sleep duration had no linear association. This “J-shaped” association was not consistent with the “U-shaped” association between sleep duration reported in many articles22. However, we thought this was not contradictory. In the meta-regression, “sleep duration” was a cut-off point defined by different authors from different ethnicities; and in one specific study, the author calculated the association among participants from a same ethnic.

Several mechanisms linked sleep duration to metabolic syndrome. Short sleep duration could lead to the following endocrine changes, by affecting carbohydrate metabolism, hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis and sympathetic activity. Decreased glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity would raise the glucose levels; increased levels of ghrelin, decreased levels of leptin and increased appetite correlated with higher waist circumstance; increased cortisol concentrations were associated with higher blood pressure23,24. Short sleepers tended to have low-grade inflammation. Elevated levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and IL-6 correlated with cardiovascular events25. Long sleep duration was linked to sleep fragmentation, which would cause plenty of health outcomes, including metabolic change26. Long sleepers also have less time to take excise, which might contribute to the association27. Both short and long sleep duration had bidirectional association with circadian rhythm, which is a risk factor for metabolic disorders28,29. Despite these mechanisms which could explain the association, whether sleep duration was a causal risk factor for metabolic syndrome was still not sure30. Cohort studies still could not provide a causal result, though they have more power than cross-sectional studies. To prove a causal relationship, we need further examine the effect of changes in sleep duration31, and product Mendelian randomization study, a method using measured variation in genes.

Our meta-analysis summarized the currently evidence of the association between abnormal sleep duration and the risk of metabolic syndrome, and indicated that short sleep duration was a risk factor for new onset metabolic syndrome. Strength of our study were the comprehensive search and strict inclusion criteria. However, there were some limitations that should be taken into consideration. First, the sleep categories varied between studies. There was no unified standard for definition of abnormal sleep duration. Second, the estimates of relative risk had less accuracy than that in the individual patient data meta-analysis. Third, we only included nine cohort studies, which prevent us from conducting further research, such as subgroup analysis and meta-regression. Fourth, only two studies used objective sleep measurement. More studies based on the objective measurement are needed in the future.

5 Conclusions

Both short and long sleep duration was associated with high prevalence of metabolic syndrome cross-sectionally. Short sleep duration, rather than long sleep duration, was associated with a significant increase in risk for metabolic syndrome. Sufficient sleep duration should be recommended to prevent metabolic syndrome.

Data Availability

This is a meta-analysis

6 Author contributions

Qi Fang and Jianian Hua contributed to the conception and design of the study. Jianian Hua organized the database. Jianian Hua and Hezi Jiang performed the statistical analysis. Jianian Hua wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Qi Fang and Hezi Jiang reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the paper.

7 Funding

This study was not supported by any funding.

8 Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

9 Preprint

Footnotes

  • 1, Author affilliations updated. 2, Little error corrected. No data was changed

12 References

  1. 1.↵
    Isomaa B, Almgren P, Tuomi T, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care 2001; 24(4): 683–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Daly CA, Hildebrandt P, Bertrand M, et al. Adverse prognosis associated with the metabolic syndrome in established coronary artery disease: data from the EUROPA trial. Heart 2007; 93(11): 1406–11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Aguilar M, Bhuket T, Torres S, Liu B, Wong RJ. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the United States, 2003-2012. JAMA 2015; 313(19): 1973–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Di Marzo V, Silvestri C. Lifestyle and Metabolic Syndrome: Contribution of the Endocannabinoidome. Nutrients 2019; 11(8).
  5. 5.↵
    Krittanawong C, Tunhasiriwet A, Wang Z, et al. Association between short and long sleep durations and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2019; 8(8): 762–70.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Jike M, Itani O, Watanabe N, Buysse DJ, Kaneita Y. Long sleep duration and health outcomes: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Sleep Med Rev 2018; 39: 25–36.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Ju SY, Choi WS. Sleep duration and metabolic syndrome in adult populations: a meta-analysis of observational studies. NutrDiabetes 2013; 3: e65.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    Iftikhar IH, Donley MA, Mindel J, Pleister A, Soriano S, Magalang UJ. Sleep Duration and Metabolic Syndrome. An Updated Dose-Risk Metaanalysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12(9): 1364–72.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    Xi B. Short sleep duration predicts risk of metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 2014.
  10. 10.↵
    Karen Grace-Martin AG. Cohort and Case-Control Studies: Pro’s and Con’s. 2017; https://www.theanalysisfactor.com/cohort-and-case-control-studies-pros-and-cons/.
  11. 11.↵
    Setia MS. Methodology Series Module 3: Cross-sectional Studies. Indian J Dermatol 2016; 61(3): 261–4.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    Deng HB, Tam T, Zee BC, et al. Short Sleep Duration Increases Metabolic Impact in Healthy Adults: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Sleep 2017; 40(10).
  13. 13.↵
    Grant RL. Converting an odds ratio to a range of plausible relative risks for better communication of research findings. BMJ 2014; 348: f7450.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Adenekan B, Pandey A, McKenzie S, Zizi F, Casimir GJ, Jean-Louis G. Sleep in America: role of racial/ethnic differences. Sleep Med Rev 2013; 17(4): 255–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Wells G SB, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2014; http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
  16. 16.↵
    Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327(7414): 557–60.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315(7109): 629–34.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994; 50(4): 1088–101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000; 56(2): 455–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    W. V. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 2010; 2010; 36:1-48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Zhang Tiansong ZS. How to compare summary estimates of different subgroups in meta-analysis. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 2017; https://www.ixueshu.com/document/be6c862ae782c141182f500f64e4272a318947a18e7f9386.html
  22. 22.↵
    Smiley A, King D, Bidulescu A. The Association between Sleep Duration and Metabolic Syndrome: The NHANES 2013/2014. Nutrients 2019; 11(11).
  23. 23.↵
    Spiegel K, Leproult R, Van Cauter E. Impact of sleep debt on metabolic and endocrine function. Lancet 1999; 354(9188): 1435–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Zimberg IZ, Damaso A, Del Re M, et al. Short sleep duration and obesity: mechanisms and future perspectives. Cell Biochem Funct 2012; 30(6): 524–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Meier-Ewert HK, Ridker Pm Fau - Rifai N, Rifai N Fau - Regan MM, et al. Effect of sleep loss on C-reactive protein, an inflammatory marker of cardiovascular risk. 2004; (0735-1097 (Print)).
  26. 26.↵
    Grandner MA, Drummond SP. Who are the long sleepers? Towards an understanding of the mortality relationship. Sleep Med Rev 2007; 11(5): 341–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Stranges S, Dorn JM, Shipley MJ, et al. Correlates of short and long sleep duration: a cross-cultural comparison between the United Kingdom and the United States: the Whitehall II Study and the Western New York Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 2008; 168(12): 1353–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Allebrandt KV, Teder-Laving M, Akyol M, et al. CLOCK gene variants associate with sleep duration in two independent populations. Bio Psychiatry 2010; 67(11): 1040–7.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    Lemmer B, Oster H. The Role of Circadian Rhythms in the Hypertension of Diabetes Mellitus and the Metabolic Syndrome. Curr Hypertens Rep 2018; 20(5): 43.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    Kraemer HC, Kazdin AE, Offord DR, Kessler RC, Jensen PS, Kupfer DJ. Coming to terms with the terms of risk. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997; 54(4): 337–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Buysse DJ. Sleep health: can we define it? Does it matter? Sleep 2014; 37(1): 9–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.
    Choi JK, Kim MY, Kim JK, et al. Association between short sleep duration and high incidence of metabolic syndrome in midlife women. Tohoku J Exp Med 2011; 225(3): 187–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.
    Otsuka T, Kawada T, Yanai M, Kitagawa Y, Kan H. [Incidence of metabolic syndrome and associated lifestyle factors in a worksite male population], Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi 2011; 53(3): 78–86.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.
    Chaput JP, McNeil J, Despres JP, Bouchard C, Tremblay A. Short sleep duration as a risk factor for the development of the metabolic syndrome in adults. Prev Med 2013; 57(6): 872–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.
    Kim JY, Yadav D, Ahn SV, et al. A prospective study of total sleep duration and incident metabolic syndrome: theARIRANG study. Sleep Med 2015; 16(12): 1511–5.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.
    Li X, Lin L, Lv L, et al. U-shaped relationships between sleep duration and metabolic syndrome and metabolic syndrome components in males: a prospective cohort study. Sleep Med 2015; 16(8): 949–54.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. 37.
    Song Q, Liu X, Zhou W, Wang X, Wu S. Changes in sleep duration and risk of metabolic syndrome: the Kailuan prospective study. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 36861.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.
    Itani O, Kaneita Y, Tokiya M, et al. Short sleep duration, shift work, and actual days taken off work are predictive life-style risk factors for new-onset metabolic syndrome: a seven-year cohort study of 40,000 male workers. Sleep Med 2017; 39: 87–94.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. 39.
    Ye Y, Zhang L, Wang A, et al. Association of sleep duration with stroke, myocardial infarction, and tumors in a Chinese population with metabolic syndrome: a retrospective study. Lipids Health Dis 2020; 19(1): 155.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Posted September 03, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
Sleep Duration and the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Jianian Hua, Hezi Jiang, Qi Fang
medRxiv 2020.08.30.20184747; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.30.20184747
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area