Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Non-invasive Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis from Ultrasound with Machine Learning

View ORCID ProfileBernhard Kainz, Antonios Makropoulos, Jonas Oppenheimer, Christopher Deane, Sven Mischkewitz, View ORCID ProfileFouad Al-Noor, View ORCID ProfileAndrew C Rawdin, Matthew D Stevenson, View ORCID ProfileRamin Mandegaran, View ORCID ProfileMattias P. Heinrich, View ORCID ProfileNicola Curry
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.23.21249964
Bernhard Kainz
1ThinkSono Ldt, Imperial College London, King’s College London, ThinkSono Ldt, 35 Mercury House, Heathcroft, W53BF London, UK
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Bernhard Kainz
  • For correspondence: bernhard{at}thinksono.com
Antonios Makropoulos
2ThinkSono Ldt, 35 Mercury House, Heathcroft, W53BF London, UK
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonas Oppenheimer
3ThinkSono GmbH. Hermannswerder 2, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Deane
4Oxford Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, Headington, Oxford OX3 7JT, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sven Mischkewitz
3ThinkSono GmbH. Hermannswerder 2, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fouad Al-Noor
2ThinkSono Ldt, 35 Mercury House, Heathcroft, W53BF London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Fouad Al-Noor
Andrew C Rawdin
7The University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research, 116, Regent Court (DCS), S10 2TN Sheffield, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrew C Rawdin
Matthew D Stevenson
7The University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research, 116, Regent Court (DCS), S10 2TN Sheffield, UK
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramin Mandegaran
9Central Alberta Medical Imaging Services, 4312 54 Ave, Red Deer, AB, Canada, T4N 4M1
MBBS BSc FRCR FRCPC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ramin Mandegaran
Mattias P. Heinrich
10University of Lübeck, Institute of Medical Informatics, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mattias P. Heinrich
Nicola Curry
4Oxford Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, Headington, Oxford OX3 7JT, UK
MD FRCP FRCPath
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nicola Curry
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) is a blood clot most found in the leg, which can lead to fatal pulmonary embolism (PE). Compression ultrasound of the legs is the diagnostic gold standard, leading to a definitive diagnosis. However, many patients with possible symptoms are not found to have a DVT, resulting in long referral waiting times for patients and a large clinical burden for specialists. Thus, diagnosis at the point of care by non-specialists is desired.

We collect images in a pre-clinical study and investigate a deep learning approach for the automatic interpretation of compression ultrasound images. Our method provides guidance for free-hand ultrasound and aids non-specialists in detecting DVT.

We train a deep learning algorithm on ultrasound videos from 246 healthy volunteers and evaluate on a sample size of 51 prospectively enrolled patients from an NHS DVT diagnostic clinic. 32 DVT-positive patients and 19 DVT-negative patients were included. Algorithmic DVT diagnosis results in a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 84.2%, a positive predictive value of 90.9%, and a negative predictive value of 88.9% compared to the clinical gold standard.

To assess the potential benefits of this technology in healthcare we evaluate the entire clinical DVT decision algorithm and provide cost analysis when integrating our approach into a diagnostic pathway for DVT. Our approach is estimated to be cost effective at up to $150 per software examination, assuming a willingness to pay $26 000/QALY.

Competing Interest Statement

B.K., M.H., R.M., and N.C. are scientific advisors for ThinkSono Ldt B.K. is also advisor for Ultromics Ldt And Cydar medical Ldt J.O. acts as a consultant for ThinkSono Ldt. A.M. was an employee of ThinkSono Ldt until September 2020. F.AN., S.M. are employees of ThinkSono Ldt, M.D.S. and A.C.R. acted as contractor for ThinkSono Ldt. All authors had full access to all data during this study and accept responsibility to submit for publication. B.K., A.M., F.AN., S.M. are joint inventors on a patent held by ThinkSono Ldt. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of ThinkSono, the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Funding Statement

ThinkSono Ldt funded the development of the method. Data was collected at Oxford Haemophilia & Thrombosis Centre independently. ThinkSono Ldt provided ultrasound data acquisition devices to Oxford Haemophilia & Thrombosis Centre for this study.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The University of Oxford, UK, 18/SC/0220, IRAS 234007

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Co-Authors:

  • Email: antonis{at}thinksono.com

  • Email: jonas{at}thinksono.com

  • Email: Christopher.Deane{at}ouh.nhs.uk

  • Email: sven{at}thinksono.com

  • Email: fouad{at}thinksono.com

  • Email: a.rawdin{at}sheffield.ac.uk

  • Email: m.d.stevenson{at}sheffield.ac.uk

  • Email: ramin.mandegaran{at}googlemail.com

  • Email: heinrich{at}imi.uni-luebeck.de

  • Email: Nicola.Curry{at}ouh.nhs.uk

Data Availability

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication in a peer reviewed journal algorithm raw data results access in line with the informed consent of the participants, subject to approval by the project ethics board and under a formal Data Sharing Agreement. Proposals may be submitted up to 36 months following article publication in a peer reviewed journal. Custom computer code is available through ThinkSono Ldt with case specific license agreements.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 27, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Non-invasive Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis from Ultrasound with Machine Learning
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Non-invasive Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis from Ultrasound with Machine Learning
Bernhard Kainz, Antonios Makropoulos, Jonas Oppenheimer, Christopher Deane, Sven Mischkewitz, Fouad Al-Noor, Andrew C Rawdin, Matthew D Stevenson, Ramin Mandegaran, Mattias P. Heinrich, Nicola Curry
medRxiv 2021.01.23.21249964; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.23.21249964
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Non-invasive Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis from Ultrasound with Machine Learning
Bernhard Kainz, Antonios Makropoulos, Jonas Oppenheimer, Christopher Deane, Sven Mischkewitz, Fouad Al-Noor, Andrew C Rawdin, Matthew D Stevenson, Ramin Mandegaran, Mattias P. Heinrich, Nicola Curry
medRxiv 2021.01.23.21249964; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.23.21249964

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Hematology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)