Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Strategies and action points to ensure equitable uptake of COVID-19 vaccinations: A national qualitative interview study to explore the views of undocumented migrants, asylum seekers, and refugees

Anna Deal, Sally E Hayward, Mashal Huda, Felicity Knights, Alison F Crawshaw, Jessica Carter, Osama B Hassan, Yasmin Farah, Yusuf Ciftci, May Rowland-Pomp, Kieran Rustage, Lucy Goldsmith, Monika Hartmann, Sandra Mounier-Jack, Rachel Burns, Anna Miller, Fatima Wurie, Ines Campos-Matos, Azeem Majeed, Sally Hargreaves on behalf of the ESCMID Study Group for Infections in Travellers and Migrants (ESGITM)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.12.21255313
Anna Deal
1The Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St Georges, University of London
2Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sally E Hayward
1The Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St Georges, University of London
2Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mashal Huda
1The Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St Georges, University of London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Felicity Knights
1The Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St Georges, University of London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alison F Crawshaw
1The Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St Georges, University of London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessica Carter
1The Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St Georges, University of London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Osama B Hassan
1The Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St Georges, University of London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yasmin Farah
1The Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St Georges, University of London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yusuf Ciftci
3Doctors of the World UK (Médecins du Monde), London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
May Rowland-Pomp
1The Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St Georges, University of London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kieran Rustage
1The Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St Georges, University of London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucy Goldsmith
1The Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St Georges, University of London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monika Hartmann
3Doctors of the World UK (Médecins du Monde), London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandra Mounier-Jack
2Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel Burns
4Centre for Public Health Data Science, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Miller
3Doctors of the World UK (Médecins du Monde), London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fatima Wurie
5Health Improvement Directorate, Public Health England, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ines Campos-Matos
5Health Improvement Directorate, Public Health England, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Azeem Majeed
6Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sally Hargreaves
1The Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St Georges, University of London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Early evidence confirms lower COVID-19 vaccine uptake in established ethnic minority populations, yet there has been little focus on understanding vaccine hesitancy and barriers to vaccination in migrants. Growing populations of precarious migrants (including undocumented migrants, asylum seekers and refugees) in the UK and Europe are considered to be under-immunised groups and may be excluded from health systems, yet little is known about their views on COVID-19 vaccines specifically, which are essential to identify key solutions and action points to strengthen vaccine roll-out.

Methods We did an in-depth semi-structured qualitative interview study of recently arrived migrants (foreign-born, >18 years old; <10 years in the UK) to the UK with precarious immigration status between September 2020 and March 2021, seeking their input into strategies to strengthen COVID-19 vaccine delivery and uptake. We used the ‘Three Cs’ model (confidence, complacency and convenience) to explore COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, barriers and access. Data were analysed using a thematic framework approach. Data collection continued until data saturation was reached, and no novel concepts were arising. The study was approved by the University of London ethics committee (REC 2020.00630).

Results We approached 20 migrant support groups nationwide, recruiting 32 migrants (mean age 37.1 years; 21 [66%] female; mean time in the UK 5.6 years [SD 3.7 years]), including refugees (n = 3), asylum seekers (n = 19), undocumented migrants (n = 8) and migrants with limited leave to remain (n = 2) from 15 different countries (5 WHO regions). 23 (72%) of 32 migrants reported being hesitant about accepting a COVID-19 vaccine and communicated concerns over vaccine content, side-effects, lack of accessible information in an appropriate language, lack of trust in the health system and low perceived need. Participants reported a range of barriers to accessing the COVID-19 vaccine and expressed concerns that their communities would be excluded from or de-prioritised in the roll-out. Undocumented migrants described fears over being charged and facing immigration checks if they present for a vaccine. All participants (n = 10) interviewed after recent government announcements that COVID-19 vaccines can be accessed without facing immigration checks remained unaware of this. Participants stated that convenience of access would be a key factor in their decision around whether to accept a vaccine and proposed alternative access points to primary care services (for example, walk-in centres in trusted places such as foodbanks, community centres and charities), alongside promoting registration with primary care for all, and working closely with communities to produce accessible information on COVID-19 vaccination.

Conclusions Precarious migrants may be hesitant about accepting a COVID-19 vaccine and face multiple and unique barriers to access, requiring simple but innovative solutions to ensure equitable access and uptake. Vaccine hesitancy and low awareness around entitlement and relevant access points could be easily addressed with clear, accessible, and tailored information campaigns, co-produced and delivered by trusted sources within marginalised migrant communities. These findings have immediate relevance to the COVID-19 vaccination initiatives in the UK and in other European and high-income countries with diverse migrant populations.

Funding NIHR

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work has been funded by the NIHR (NIHR300072). AD and SEH are funded by the MRC (MR/N013638/1). SH and AFC are funded by the NIHR (NIHR Advanced Fellowship NIHR300072) and the Academy of Medical Sciences (SBF005\1111). This work has been supported by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Infections in Travellers and Migrants (ESGITM). JC is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) in-practice clinical fellowship (NIHR300290). FK is supported by a Health Education England / National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Academic Clinical Fellowship. Kieran Rustage is funded by the Rosetrees Trust (M775). SMJ was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Immunisation at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) in partnership with Public Health England (PHE). AM is supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) NW London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was approved by the University of London ethics committee (REC 2020.00630).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data will be made available on the St George's repository.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 19, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Strategies and action points to ensure equitable uptake of COVID-19 vaccinations: A national qualitative interview study to explore the views of undocumented migrants, asylum seekers, and refugees
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Strategies and action points to ensure equitable uptake of COVID-19 vaccinations: A national qualitative interview study to explore the views of undocumented migrants, asylum seekers, and refugees
Anna Deal, Sally E Hayward, Mashal Huda, Felicity Knights, Alison F Crawshaw, Jessica Carter, Osama B Hassan, Yasmin Farah, Yusuf Ciftci, May Rowland-Pomp, Kieran Rustage, Lucy Goldsmith, Monika Hartmann, Sandra Mounier-Jack, Rachel Burns, Anna Miller, Fatima Wurie, Ines Campos-Matos, Azeem Majeed, Sally Hargreaves
medRxiv 2021.04.12.21255313; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.12.21255313
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Strategies and action points to ensure equitable uptake of COVID-19 vaccinations: A national qualitative interview study to explore the views of undocumented migrants, asylum seekers, and refugees
Anna Deal, Sally E Hayward, Mashal Huda, Felicity Knights, Alison F Crawshaw, Jessica Carter, Osama B Hassan, Yasmin Farah, Yusuf Ciftci, May Rowland-Pomp, Kieran Rustage, Lucy Goldsmith, Monika Hartmann, Sandra Mounier-Jack, Rachel Burns, Anna Miller, Fatima Wurie, Ines Campos-Matos, Azeem Majeed, Sally Hargreaves
medRxiv 2021.04.12.21255313; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.12.21255313

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Policy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)