ABSTRACT
Random-effect score test has become an important tool for studying the association between a set of genetic variants and a disease outcome. While a number of random-effect score test approaches have been proposed in the literature, similar approaches for multinomial logistic regression have received less attention. In a recent effort to develop random-effect score test for multinomial logistic regression, we made the observation that such a test is not invariant to the choice of the reference level. This is intriguing because binary logistic regression is well-known to possess the invariance property with respect to the reference level. Here, we investigate why the multinomial logistic regression is not invariant to the reference level, and derive analytic forms to study how the choice of the reference level influences the power. Then we consider several potential procedures that are invariant to the reference level, and compare their performance through numerical studies. Our work provides valuable insights into the properties of multinomial logistic regression with respect to random-effect score test, and adds a useful tool for studying the genetic heterogeneity of complex diseases.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by NIH grant R01CA223498 and R01CA189532.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All data are simulated. No real data are involved in this manuscript.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data used in this manuscript are simulated.
