ABSTRACT
Background Vestibular deficit is common following concussion and may affect gait. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in head and pelvic center of mass (COM) movement during gait in tactical athletes with and without concussion-related central vestibular impairment.
Material & Methods 24 patients with post-concussion vestibular impairment (20 males, 4 females; age: 31.7±7.9 years; BMI: 27.3±3.3) and 24 matched controls (20 males, 4 females; age: 31.8±6.4 years; BMI: 27.2±2.6) were included in the analyses. Three-dimensional head and pelvic COM displacement and velocities were collected at a 1.0 m/s standardized treadmill walking speed and assessed using Statistical Parametric Mapping t-tests. Maximum differences (dmax) between groups were reported for all significant kinematic findings.
Results The Vestibular group demonstrated significantly diminished anteroposterior head excursions (dmax=2.3 cm, p=0.02;) and slower anteroposterior (dmax=0.37 m/s, p=0.01), mediolateral (dmax=0.47 m/s, p=0.02) and vertical (dmax=0.26 m/s, p<0.001) velocities during terminal stance into pre-swing phases compared to the Control group. Vertical pelvic COM excursion was significantly increased in midstance (dmax=2.4 cm, p=0.03) and mediolaterally during pre-to initial-swing phases (dmax=7.5 cm, p<0.001) in the Vestibular group. In addition, Pelvic COM velocities of the Vestibular group were higher mediolaterally during midstance (dmax=0.19 m/s, p=0.02) and vertically during post-initial contact (dmax=0.14 m/s, p<0.001) and pre-swing (dmax=0.16 m/s, p<0.001) compared to the Control group.
Significance The Vestibular group demonstrated a more constrained head movement strategy during gait compared with Controls, a finding that is likely attributed to a neurological impairment of visual-vestibular-somatosensory integration.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the U.S. Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery under work unit no. N1703.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study protocol was approved by the Naval Health Research Center Institutional Review Board in compliance with all applicable Federal regulations governing the protection of human subjects. Research data were derived from an approved Naval Health Research Center Institutional Review Board protocol, number NHRC.2015.0010. All participants provided informed consent.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: This work was supported by the U.S. Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery under work unit no. N1703.
Disclaimer: The author(s) are military service members or employees of the U.S. Government and this work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17, U.S.C. §105 provides that copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the U.S. Government. Title 17, U.S.C. §101 defines a U.S. Government work as work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person’s official duties. Report No. 19-69 was supported by the U.S. Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery under work unit no. N1703. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the U.S. Government. The study protocol was approved by the Naval Health Research Center Institutional Review Board in compliance with all applicable Federal regulations governing the protection of human subjects. Research data were derived from an approved Naval Health Research Center Institutional Review Board protocol, number NHRC.2015.0010. All participants provided informed consent.
Presented at the Military Health System Research Symposium, August 20, 2018, Orlando, FL and is archived at doi:10.7490/f1000research.1115992. The preprint of the manuscript is archived on medRxiv and accessible at doi:10.1101/2021.04.27.21256200
Corrected and reconciled the number of participants in each group in the abstract, flow diagram, and in the text of the methodology section. Updated disclosure for Leidos affiliated authors.
Data Availability
Due to the nature of this research, participants of this study did not agree for their data to be shared publicly, so supporting data is not available.
