Head and body dyskinesia during gait in tactical athletes with vestibular deficit following concussion

2.1. Participants

After excluding one participant for suspected secondary gain, 24 tactical athletes in the United States Armed Forces with post-concussion vestibular impairment (20 males, 4 females; age: 31.7±7.9 years; BMI: 27.3±3.3) recruited from a military vestibular rehabilitation clinic were included in the analyses. The control group was comprised of 24 tactical athletes without a history of concussion (20 males, 4 females; age: 31.8±6.4 years; BMI: 27.2±2.6) that were matched on sex, age, and BMI (Table 1). Participants in both groups were included if they were active duty military between the ages of 18 and 50. Those who incurred a concussion 6 to 52 weeks prior to consent and had a medical diagnosis of a concussion-related central vestibular disorder were included in the post-concussion Vestibular group [Dizziness Handicap Inventory: 41.0±19.9; Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale: 73.7±17.1; Functional Gait Assessment: 23.8±4.5; Computerized Dynamic Posturography Sensory Organization Test (SOT) Composite: 63.1±12.1]. Healthy controls must have passed their most recent physical fitness assessment.

Participants were excluded from participation if they had an orthopaedic condition that could affect gait, impaired joint mobility, benign positional vertigo, fluctuating peripheral vestibular dysfunction, non-organic behavior, conversion reactions, peripheral neuropathy, oculomotor nuclei (III, IV, VI) abnormalities, motor impairment, central neurological diseases, cerebral vascular accident, or were pregnant. Each participant gave informed consent before participating in the study. While participants did not directly contribute to the design of this study, specialist clinicians who care for and advocate for this patient population contributed. Regarding dissemination, study participants will be provided a link to a website that explains the research findings in common language. This study was approved by the Naval Health Research Center Institutional Review Board (protocol NHRC.2015.0010).

2.2. Procedures

Figure 1 details the study flow sheet from recruitment to analysis. Following consent, patients provided demographic information, and health and injury history. Height and mass were measured. Patients were asked to walk at a 1.0 m/s pace on a dual-belt instrumented treadmill (Motekforce Link, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) while looking forward at an optotype placed on a screen in front of the treadmill. Subjects wore a safety harness to prevent them from falling but the harness did not provide weight support.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig. 1.

Study flow diagram.

Kinematic data were collected with a 14-camera optical motion capture system (Motion Analysis Corp., Santa Rosa, CA, USA) at 120 Hz and referenced to the world. Three-dimensional measurements of COM displacement and velocity for 10–15 consecutive strides were averaged using 101 data points and normalized to initial contact (IC). Head movement was tracked using a total of five photo-reflective markers affixed to a fitted ball cap worn on the head (left, front, right, back, and top of the head). A cluster of four markers affixed to a rigid plastic fixture and placed on the sacrum measured pelvic motion. A single heel marker affixed to the counter of each shoe were used to demarcate initial contact during gait. Kinematic data were processed using the Visual3D software (C-Motion Inc., Germantown, MD, USA). Head and pelvic COM were calculated as the average X,Y, Z position of the head and pelvic markers, respectively, while foot contact positions were collected using the heel markers. Velocities were calculated as the first derivative of the positional data.

2.3. Statistical analysis

An a priori sample size estimation of 16 participants were needed based on the variance of head stabilization,[6] an α=.05, and β=.20. Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographic and spatiotemporal gait characteristics and assessed for differences with independent t-tests using MATLAB (MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA). Group differences in triplanar motion of the head and pelvic COM over the gait cycle were assessed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) t-tests using spm1d version 0.4, a package written by Pataky(8) for one-dimensional SPM analysis for Python 3.6.5 (Python Software Foundation, Beaverton, OR, USA). Maximum differences (d_max) and mean difference (d_mean) between the two groups were reported for all significant kinematic findings.

4.1. Head mechanics

We posit that the observed lower head excursion and velocity are likely a compensation for deficits in dynamic visual acuity (DVA), gaze stabilization, and subjective visual vertical affecting static and dynamic spatial orientation. From a kinematic perspective, movement of the head functions similarly to the proximal joints of the extremities. The mobility of the head allows for multiple degrees of freedom when exploring the environment visually. Similar to the extremities, proximal segmental stabilization of the head contributes to visual acuity, gaze stability, and spatial orientation. Vestibulopathy following concussion likely manifests with compensatory reduction of head excursion to try to stabilize gaze during dynamic gait. Further research incorporating optical tracking in relation to head movement during gait tasking is needed to substantiate this supposition.

The VOR, gaze stabilization, accurate subjective visual vertical, and the angular vestibulocollic (VCR) and cervicocollic (CCR) reflexes are important in head stabilization and control during static and dynamic function.(9) Increasing temporal stimulation of the semicircular canals, otoliths sensitive to gravity, and the eyes contribute to ‘velocity storage’ in the vestibular nuclei.(10) Individuals post-concussion may display high-gain VOR and a propensity for motion intolerance. Decreased excursion of head motion response to external moments is a countermeasure for the conflicting sensory afference when gait tasking is superimposed. Both the VCR and the CCR function to dampen head movement(9) and are normally inhibited during gait.(11) Our findings suggest that central vestibular impairment resulting from concussion may disinhibit these reflexes during walking,(9,12) resulting in diminished head movement during gait.

Mechanical or neurophysiological impairment resulting from zygapophyseal or muscular injury in the cervical spine may contribute to constrained head movement. Kinematics of concussion involved high accelerations of the head that are mitigated by cervical co-contraction.(13) Cervical spine pain is a common comorbidity following concussion, a condition that has many overlapping signs and symptoms.(14) It is plausible that injury to the cervical joints and muscles that serve an important role in providing afferent information regarding head position is disrupted. Furthermore, injury may change the contraction dynamics of the cervical musculature(9)and further increase the burden on impaired central control mechanisms.

Psychogenic factors are both plausible and a likely contributor to diminished head movement excursion and velocity following concussion. Individuals with psychological trauma resulting from the injurious event or other prior traumatic exposure may demonstrate altered movement strategies. Kinesiophobia, pain, and perceived function have previously been shown to be associated with altered cervical kinematics.(15)

To contextualize our results, our data both agree and diverge from previous studies of head movement in patients with post-concussion central vestibular deficit and other studies investigating peripheral vestibular dysfunction. Sessoms and colleagues(7) assessed head kinematics during walking in tactical-athletes with post-concussion vestibular deficit and found asynchrony and large group variability of head position in relation to the pelvic COM. We similarly observed substantially large group variability, a finding likely resulting from heterogeneity of movement strategies employed during walking in the Vestibular group. Mijovic and colleagues(16) studied head movement in individuals with unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit during a 15-meter walking task using movement sensors and found no kinematic differences compared to healthy controls. This is likely a function of severity of impairment, with our sample having substantially higher DHI scores compared to those reported by Mijovic and colleagues.(16) While Pozzo and colleagues(17) found that individuals with bilateral peripheral vestibular deficit demonstrated no significant differences in head motion during walking measured with video analysis, they similarly observed greater variability in movement. Disparity between our findings and those previously reported are likely a function of lesion type and severity of symptoms.

4.2. Body mechanics

Basford and colleagues(18) studied body COM kinematics in individuals with traumatic brain injury with similar DHI scores and found that body COM excursion and velocity were significantly diminished in the AP and increased in the ML. These findings were attributed to decreased walking velocity and step length,(18) spatiotemporal alterations previously observed in this clinical population.(18,19) The supposition of pelvic excursion as a function of spatiotemporal parameters is supported by our findings. While we similarly saw increased mediolateral and vertical pelvic motion and velocity, we did not observe any differences in anteroposterior parameters. Since gait speed was standardized, the increased mediolateral pelvic excursion was likely attributed to the wider step width, a finding likely attributed to the neurological deficit.

The pelvic excursions and velocities observed in our study agree with a few previously-reported findings. Catena and colleagues(20) studied pelvic COM kinematics during over-ground walking in individuals post-concussion and found that pelvic COM velocity were significantly increased in the ML, with significantly lower COM velocity in the AP. They did not find any significant differences in pelvic excursion. (20) In a later study, Catena and colleagues(21) found no significant differences in COM kinematics between post-concussion patients and healthy controls during single-task walking up to 28 days post injury. Parker and colleagues(22) found that while AP displacement and velocity were not significantly different between post-concussion patients and healthy controls up to 28 days following concussion, there was a significantly diminished maximum separation difference between AP COM and center of pressure indicating a more conservative strategy for stability. Reciprocal arm swing has been postulated to be a mass dampener that mitigates trunk torsion and head yaw during walking.(23) While we did not measure upper extremity kinematics, it is plausible that asynchronous arm swing likely contributed to alteration in pelvic and head mechanics in this study.

4.3 Clinical and research implications

Clinical and instrumented measures of head motion during gait may garner additional information regarding central neurological mechanisms and may be an important clinical correlate in the assessment of the balance system during function. Based on heterogeneity of clinical presentation following concussion, diminished head motion may be a useful measure when diagnosing, prognosticating, and guiding treatment in this population. Physical examination should include assessment of cervical motion, cervicogenic dizziness, dynamic visual acuity, gaze stabilization, subjective visual vertical, static balance using the SOT, and gait. Identified deficits to include diminished head kinematics during gait should be addressed during rehabilitation to allow the patient to reach their full potential. Further research is needed to investigate the relationship between head motion and optical tracking and stabilization and how these change in response to vestibular rehabilitation.

4.4. Limitations

There are limitations to this study. This was a cross-sectional study, so cause and effect relations cannot be determined. The study sample consisted of young adult tactical athletes with a high level of physical function prior to injury, hence generalizability is likely limited to individuals of similar age and physical function. Kinematic measurements were focused on assessment of the pelvic and head COM during walking. Three-dimensional kinematic evaluation of head, arm, trunk, and lower extremity kinematics were not possible based on the marker set used in this study. Future study should consider the intersegmental coupling relationships that can further elucidate these findings.