Abstract
Introduction Lower limb amputation is a life-changing event for patients and can be associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Research into this critical part of vascular surgery is limited. The Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland (VSGBI) in partnership with the James Lind Alliance (JLA) process, aimed to identify and develop key research priorities for amputation.
Methods A modified JLA Priority Setting Partnership was undertaken, encompassing all vascular practice. Two separate Delphi processes to identify research topics were undertaken with healthcare professionals, patients and carers, led by the VSGBI. The priorities were then ranked by the same participants and amalgamated to produce a list for final prioritisation. The final consensus meeting was attended by patients, carers and healthcare professionals from a variety of backgrounds involved in the care of people with amputation. Using a nominal group technique, the top ten research priorities were identified.
Results A total of 481 clinicians submitted 1231 research questions relating to vascular surgery in general. 63 amputation-specific research questions were combined into 5 final clinical questions. 373 patients or carers submitted 582 research questions related to vascular surgery in general. Nine amputation-specific research questions were identified after combining similar questions. Amalgamating both the clinician and patient questions, 12 questions were discussed at the final prioritisation meeting and the top 10 identified. These related to amputation prevention, supporting rehabilitation, improving clinical outcomes following amputation (preventing/treating pain including phantom limb pain and improving wound healing) and research into information provision for patients undergoing amputation.
Conclusion The top 10 research priority areas in vascular amputation provide guidance for researchers, clinicians, and funders on the direction of future research questions that are important to both healthcare professionals and patients.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Project was funded by a grant from the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
NA
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The Amputation SIG team comprised: Participants: Annie Clothier, Barrie Evans, Bernie Wilkes, Chantel Ostler, Clifton Henry, Damien Harper, Dave Buchanan, David Bradley, Eddie Bowen, Harvey Solomons, Hayley Crane, Ian Baxter, John Horsfall, Lucy Wales, Michelle Stubley, Natalie Vanicek, Neil Head, Paul Stopforth, Rachael Lovegrove, Rahul Velineni, Sam Eldabe, Sarah Day, Shigong Guo, Sue Ward
Facilitators: Judith Long, Maryrose Tarpey, Toto Gronlund
Observers: Dave Bosanquet, Esmee Hanna, Ian Chetter, Kitty HF Wong, Robert Hinchliffe, Sandip J Nandhra
Technical Support: Becky Carthy
Data Availability
Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
