Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Potential applications of the rapid COVID-19 antibody test kit screening in comparison to the RT-PCR in patients and personnel at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Amarin Narkwichean, Wittaya Jomoui, Rarinthip Boonpradit, Wipada Laosooksathit, View ORCID ProfileTanawin Nopsopon, View ORCID ProfileKrit Pongpirul
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.16.21259725
Amarin Narkwichean
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wittaya Jomoui
2Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rarinthip Boonpradit
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wipada Laosooksathit
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tanawin Nopsopon
3Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tanawin Nopsopon
Krit Pongpirul
3Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
4Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Krit Pongpirul
  • For correspondence: doctorkrit{at}gmail.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To explore potential applications of the rapid antibody test for COVID-19 screening, in comparison to RT-PCR, for emergency obstetric and gynecological procedures, and medical personnel in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in expected 290 participants: 230 patients and 60 medical staff, during the four-month national COVID-19 outbreak period (Aug – Sep 2020, and Dec 2020 - Jan 2021). All participants underwent both rapid antibody tests and RT-PCR (at admission for patients).

Results A total of 270 participants completed the study. Fever and URI symptoms were present in 6/210 patients (2.8%) while one patient (0.5%) had a history of traveling to a high-risk area. However, only two (1%) asymptomatic patients had positive IgM results. Concerning the medical personnel, 10% fell into the ‘patient under investigation (PUI)’ category. 4/60 (6.7%) IgM positive was observed in the staff cohort in which 3/4 came from non-PUI participants. Neither participant had RT-PCR positive demonstrating a 1.9% total false positive rate.

Conclusion Rapid point-of-care antibody test can be used to screen either a pregnant coming for delivery, a patient who requires urgent/emergency operative procedures, or medical personnel, at least in the defined lower-prevalence COVID-19 situation.

Trial registration This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Srinakharinwirot University (IRB SWUEC119/2563F) and was registered at the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR20210613001).

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

Thai Clinical Trials Registry: TCTR20210613001

Clinical Protocols

https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/

Funding Statement

The study received full financial support from the Health System Research Institute (Thai government agencies), Thailand.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Srinakharinwirot University (IRB SWUEC119/2563F).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Synopsis: The article describes the application of the rapid COVID-19 antibody test kit to screen both patients (admitted for operation/procedure) and medical personnel in O&G department.

Data Availability

All data relevant to the study are included in the article. De-identified data of this study could be shared upon request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 20, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Potential applications of the rapid COVID-19 antibody test kit screening in comparison to the RT-PCR in patients and personnel at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Potential applications of the rapid COVID-19 antibody test kit screening in comparison to the RT-PCR in patients and personnel at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Amarin Narkwichean, Wittaya Jomoui, Rarinthip Boonpradit, Wipada Laosooksathit, Tanawin Nopsopon, Krit Pongpirul
medRxiv 2021.07.16.21259725; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.16.21259725
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Potential applications of the rapid COVID-19 antibody test kit screening in comparison to the RT-PCR in patients and personnel at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Amarin Narkwichean, Wittaya Jomoui, Rarinthip Boonpradit, Wipada Laosooksathit, Tanawin Nopsopon, Krit Pongpirul
medRxiv 2021.07.16.21259725; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.16.21259725

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)