Abstract
Background Education might be causal to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We triangulated cohort and genetic evidence to consolidate the causality between education and T2DM.
Methods We obtained observational evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). Self-reporting educational attainment was categorised as high (post-secondary and higher), middle (secondary), and low (below secondary or no academic qualifications) in 6,787 community-dwelling individuals aged ≥50 years without diabetes at ELSA wave 2, who were followed until wave 8 for the first diabetes diagnosis. Additionally, we performed two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) using an inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median (WM), and weighted mode-based estimate (WMBE) method. Steiger filtering was further applied to exclude single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were correlated with an outcome (T2DM) stronger than exposure (education attainment).
Results We observed 598 new diabetes cases after 10.4 years of follow-up. The adjusted hazard ratios (95%CI) of T2DM were 1.20 (0.97-1.49) and 1.58 (1.28-1.96) in the middle- and low-education groups, respectively, compared to the high-education group. Low education was also associated with increased glycated haemoglobin levels. Psychosocial resources, occupation, and health behaviours fully explained these inverse associations. In the MR analysis of 210 SNPs (R2=0.0161), the odds ratio of having T2DM per standard deviation-decreasing years (4.2 years) of schooling was 1.33 (1.01-1.75; IVW), 1.23 (0.37-4.17; MR-Egger), 1.56 (1.09-2.27; WM), and 2.94 (0.98-9.09; WMBE). However, applying Steiger filtering attenuated most MR results toward the null.
Conclusions Our inconsistent findings between cohort and genetic evidence did not support the causality between education and T2DM.
What is already known on this subject?
- Several pieces of evidence suggested that education attainment might play a causal role in the occurrence of T2DM.
What does this study add?
- Our observational evidence suggested no direct impact of education on the risk of T2DM. The observed inverse associations were mediated through insufficient psychosocial resources, low occupation class, and unhealthy behaviours due to low education.
- In contrast, the genetic evidence suggested no causal association between education and the risk of T2DM. Notably, the significant associations from our genetic evidence resulted from the invalid genetic instrument used in the analysis.
- The observational and genetic evidence was inconsistent; therefore, our triangulated evidence did not support a causal role of education in the occurrence of T2DM.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research project was supported by the Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund and the University of Phayao (Grant No. FF64-UoE039). However, the funding body did not involve the design, analysis, and interpretation of this study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing has been approved by the National Research Ethics Service (London Multicentre Research Ethics Committee (MREC/01/2/91)). For the MR study, specific ethical approval has been obtained individually in the original genome-wide association studies (GWAS).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
ELSA data were made available through the UK Data Archive. Genetic data used in this research are also publicly available on a public domain.
