Abstract
Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) is the most common identified bacterial cause of pneumonia, and the leading infectious cause of death in children under five years of age worldwide. Pneumococcal disease follows a seasonal pattern with increased incidence during winter. Pneumonia burden is also associated with poor air quality. Nasopharyngeal carriage of the bacterium is a pre-requisite of invasive disease.
We aimed to determine if susceptibility to nasopharyngeal pneumococcal carriage varied by season, and which environmental factors might explain such variation. We also evaluated the influence of sex on susceptibility of carriage. We collated data from five studies in which human volunteers underwent intranasal pneumococcal challenge. Generalised linear mixed effects models were used to identify factors associated with altered risk of carriage acquisition, specifically climate and air-quality data.
During 2011-2017, 374 healthy adults were challenged with type 6B pneumococcus. Odds of carriage were significantly lower in males (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.92; p = 0.02), and higher with cooler temperatures (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.99; p = 0.04). Likelihood of carriage also associated with lower concentrations of local fine particulate matter concentrations (PM2.5) and increased local rainfall.
In contrast to epidemiologic series, experimental challenge allowed us to test propensity to acquisition during controlled exposures; immunologic explanations for sex and climatic differences should be sought.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
KSC is funded by the MRC Doctoral Training Partnership. The challenge studies were funded by the MRC (grant MR/M011569/1) awarded to SBG and DMF and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (grant OPP1117728) awarded to DMF.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was a retrospective meta-analysis so no ethical approval was required. A meta-analysis was conducted using data of five clinical trials carried out at the Clinical Research Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine between November 2011 and March 2017. All studies were approved by the sponsors and the North West NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC numbers: 11/NW/0592, 15/NW/0146, 14/NW/1460, 12/NW/0873).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data from trials mentioned in the manuscript have been published prevously. For this analysis, we used collated colonisation data from our challenge model trials. Air-quality data files from Speke, Liverpool were available from the Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs. Regional climate data were obtained for 2011-2017 from the nearest Meteorological Office facility (located 69 miles West of Liverpool in Valley, Anglesey).
