Abstract
Introduction Anastomotic insufficiency (AI) is a relatively common but grave complication after colorectal surgery. This study aims to determine whether AI can be predicted from simple preoperative data using machine learning (ML) algorithms.
Methods and analysis In this retrospective analysis, patients undergoing colorectal surgery with creation of a bowel anastomosis from the University Hospital of Basel were included. Data was split into a training set (80%) and a test set (20%). The group of patients with AI was oversampled to a ratio of 50:50 in the training set and missing values were imputed. Known predictors of AI were included as inputs: age, BMI, smoking status, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, type of operation, indication, haemoglobin and albumin levels, and renal function.
Results Of the 593 included patients, 88 experienced AI. At internal validation on unseen patients from the test set, area under the curve (AUC) was 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.79), calibration slope was 0.16 (95% CI: −0.06-0.39) and calibration intercept was 0.06 (95% CI: 0.02-0.11). We observed a specificity of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.58-0.76), sensitivity of 0.36 (95% CI: 0.08-0.67), and accuracy of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.55-0.72).
Conclusion By using 10 patient-related risk factors associated with AI, we demonstrate the feasibility of ML-based prediction of AI after colorectal surgery. Nevertheless, it is crucial to include multicenter data and higher sample sizes to develop a robust and generalisable model, which will subsequently allow for deployment of the algorithm in a web-based application.
Strengths and limitations of this study
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to establish a risk prediction model for anastomotic insufficiency in a perioperative setting in colon surgery.
Data from all patients that underwent colon surgery within 8 years at University Hospital Basel were included.
We evaluated the feasibility of developing a machine learning model that predicts the outcome by using well-known risk factors for anastomotic insufficiency.
Although our model showed promising results, it is crucial to validate our findings externally before clinical practice implications are possible.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Northwestern and Central Ethics Committee Switzerland (BASEC-Nr 2020-02265).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Sources of funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Previous communications: This manuscript has been submitted to medRxiv for preprint.
Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Northwestern and Central Ethics Committee Switzerland (BASEC-Nr 2020-02265).
Data Availability Statement: The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
This version of the manuscript has been revised for a new submission.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
