Abstract
Background It is plausible that maternal pregnancy metabolism influences risk of offspring congenital heart disease (CHD). We sought to explore this through a systematic approach using different methods and data.
Methods We undertook multivariable logistic regression of the odds of CHD for 923 Mass Spectrometry (MS)-derived metabolites in a sub-sample of a UK birth cohort (Born in Bradford (BiB); N = 2,605, 46 CHD cases). We considered metabolites reaching a p-value threshold <0.05 to be suggestively associated with CHD. We sought validation of our findings, by repeating the multivariable regression analysis within the BiB cohort for any metabolite that was measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) or clinical chemistry (N = 7,296, 87 CHD cases), and by using genetic risk scores (GRS: weighted genetic risk scores of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were associated with each metabolite) in Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. MR analyses were performed in BiB and two additional European birth cohorts (N = 38,662, 319 CHD cases).
Results In the main multivariable analyses, we identified 44 metabolites suggestively associated with CHD, including those from the following super pathways: amino acids, lipids, co-factors and vitamins, xenobiotics, nucleotides, energy, and several unknown molecules. Of these 44, isoleucine and leucine were available in the larger BiB cohort (NMR), and for these the results were validated. MR analyses were possible for 27/44 metabolites and for 11 there was consistency with multivariable regression results.
Conclusions In summary, we have used complimentary data sources and statistical techniques to construct layers of evidence. We found that amino acid metabolism during pregnancy, several lipids (more specifically androgenic steroids), and levels of succinylcarnitine could be important contributing factors for CHD.
Competing Interest Statement
DAL has received support from Medtronic Ltd. and Roche Diagnostics for biomarker research unrelated to those presented in this paper. OAA is a consultant to HealthLytix.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the European Research Council under the European Unions Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) / (grant agreement No 669545), US National Institute of Health (R01 DK10324) British Heart Foundation (CS/16/4/32482) and UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00011/6). K. Taylor is supported by a British Heart Foundation Doctoral Training Program (FS/17/60/33474). K. Taylor, Dr McBride, Dr Borges, and Prof Lawlor work in a unit that is supported by the University of Bristol and UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00011/6). Prof Lawlors contribution is also supported by a British Heart Foundation Chair in Cardiovascular Science and Clinical Epidemiology (CH/F/20/90003) and a NIHR Senior Investigator (NF-0616-10102). Prof Caputo is supported by the British Heart Foundation Chair in Congenital Heart Disease (CH/1/32804). Dr. Magnus has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 947684). This research was also supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme (Project No. 262700). M.C. Borges is supported by a Vice Chancellors fellowship from the University of Bristol. BiB study has received core support from Wellcome Trust (223601/Z/21/Z and WT101597MA), a joint grant from the UK Medical Research Council and UK Economic and Social Science Research Council (MR/N024397/1), the British Heart Foundation (CS/16/4/32482), and the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Yorkshire and Humber (NIHR200166) and Clinical Research Network. Core funding for ALSPAC is provided by the UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (217065/Z/19/) and the University of Bristol. Many grants have supported different data collections, including for some of the data used in this publication, and a comprehensive list of grant funding is available on the ALSPAC website (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf). GWAS data was generated by Sample Logistics and Genotyping Facilities at Wellcome Sanger Institute and LabCorp (Laboratory Corporation of America) using support from 23andMe. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care. The Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study is supported by the Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services and the Ministry of Education and Research. The EPIC-Norfolk study (https://doi.org/10.22025/2019.10.105.00004) has received funding from the Medical Research Council (MR/N003284/1 MC-UU_12015/1 and MC_UU_00006/1) and Cancer Research UK (C864/A14136). The genetics work in the EPIC-Norfolk study was funded by the Medical Research Council (MC_PC_13048). Metabolite measurements in the EPIC-Norfolk study were supported by the MRC Cambridge Initiative in Metabolic Science (MR/L00002/1) and the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under EMIF grant agreement no. 115372.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for ALSPAC was obtained from the ALSPAC Law and Ethics committee and local research ethics committees (NHS Haydock REC: 10/H1010/70). Informed consent for the use of data collected via questionnaires and clinics was obtained from participants following the recommendations of the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee at the time. At age 18, study children were sent fair processing materials describing ALSPACs intended use of their health and administrative records and were given clear means to consent or object via a written form. Data were not extracted for participants who objected, or who were not sent fair processing materials. For BiB, Ethics approval has been obtained for the main platform study and all of the individual sub studies from the Bradford Research Ethics Committee. Written consent was obtained from all participants. The establishment of MoBa and initial data collection was based on a license from the Norwegian Data Protection Agency and approval from The Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics. The MoBa cohort is now based on regulations related to the Norwegian Health Registry Act.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Minor edits of manuscript after comments from co-authors and prior to journal submission.
Data Availability
Before you contact BiB study, please make sure you have read the Guidance for Collaborators: https://borninbradford.nhs.uk/research/guidance-for-collaborators/). The ALSPAC data management plan (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/data-access/documents/alspac-data-management-plan.pdf) describes in detail the policy on data sharing, which is through a system of managed open access. Scientists are encouraged to make use of the BiB study data, which are available through a system of managed open access. Please note that the study website contains details of all the data that is available through a fully searchable data dictionary and variable search tool" and reference the following webpage: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/our-data/. MoBa data are used by researchers and research groups at both the Norwegian Institute of Public Health and other research institutions nationally and internationally. The research must adhere to the aims of MoBa and the participants' given consent. All use of data and biological material from MoBa is subject to Norwegian legislation. More information can be found on the study website (https://www.fhi.no/en/studies/moba/for-forskere-artikler/research-and-data-access/).
