Abstract
Objective Polygenic scores (PGS) are widely used in psychiatric genetic associations studies due to their impressive power to predict focal outcomes. However, they lack in discriminatory power, in part due to the high degree of genetic overlap between psychiatric disorders. The lack of prediction specificity limits the clinical utility of psychiatric PGS, particularly for diagnostic applications. The goal of the study was to enhance the discriminatory power of psychiatric PGS for two highly comorbid and genetically correlated neurodevelopmental disorders in ADHD and autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
Methods Genomic structural equation modeling (GenomicSEM) was used to generate novel PGS for ADHD and ASD by accounting for the genetic overlap between these disorders (and eight others) to achieve greater discriminatory power in non-focal outcome predictions. PGS associations were tested in two large independent samples – the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (N=4,789) and the Simons Foundation Powering Autism Research for Knowledge (SPARK) ASD and sibling controls (N=5,045) cohort.
Results PGS from GenomicSEM achieved superior discriminatory power in terms of showing significantly attenuated associations with non-focal outcomes relative to traditionally computed PGS for these disorders. Additionally, genetic correlations between GenomicSEM PGS for ASD and ADHD were significantly attenuated in cross-trait associations with other psychiatric disorders and outcomes.
Conclusions Psychiatric PGS associations are likely inflated by the high degree of genetic overlap between the psychiatric disorders. Methods such as GenomicSEM can be used to refine PGS signals to be more disorder-specific, thereby enhancing their discriminatory power for future diagnostic applications.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50HD105353)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Approval was received to use PNC (dbGaP Project ID: 17057) and SPARK data (SFARI Project ID: 3276.1.5) for the current research. The IRB of the University of Wisconsin-Madison provided an exemption for ethical approval for the research herein (IRB # 2018-0616).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Disclosures James J. Li, Quanfa He, Zihang Wang, and Qiongshi Lu report no financial relationships with commercial interests.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
