Abstract
Past major epidemic events showed that when an infectious disease is perceived to cause severe health outcomes, individuals modify health behavior affecting epidemic dynamics. To investigate the effect of this feedback relationship on epidemic dynamics, we developed a compartmental model that couples a disease spread framework with competition of two mutually exclusive health opinions (health-positive and health-neutral) associated with different health behaviors. The model is based on the assumption that individuals switch health opinions as a result of exposure to opinions of others through interpersonal communications. To model opinion switch rates, we considered a family of functions and identified the ones that allow health opinions to co-exist. In the disease-free population, either the opinions cannot co-exist and one of them is always dominating (monobelief equilibrium) or there is at least one stable co-existence of opinions equilibrium. In the latter case, there is multistability between the co-existence equilibrium and the two monobelief equilibria. When two opinions co-exist, it depends on their distribution whether the infection can invade. If presence of the infection leads to increased switching to a health-positive opinion, the epidemic burden becomes smaller than indicated by the basic reproduction number. Additionally, a feedback between epidemic dynamics and health opinion dynamics may result in (sustained) oscillatory dynamics and a switch to a different stable opinion distribution. Our model captures feedback between spread of awareness through social networks and infection dynamics and can serve as a basis for more elaborate individual-based models.
Significance Statement Disease epidemics often co-evolve with opinions on health-related behavior. Most existing models have difficulties understanding co-existence of different opinions in a population when the disease is not present, while we do observe this. We modeled opinion switching process by using an innovative way to capture the dependence of opinion switching rate on the population state. We combined this with network interaction patterns and were able to derive conditions under which a stable co-existence of opinions can occur. We used this insight to explain appearance of epidemic cycles and the population switching between different distributions of opinions. Our work demonstrates that for information interventions accurate understanding of opinion propagation processes is crucial.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
ZonMw grant number 91216062
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing interests.
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at the repository on Github.
