Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Best of intent, worst of both worlds: why sequentially combining epidemiological designs does not improve signal detection in vaccine safety surveillance

View ORCID ProfileFaaizah Arshad, View ORCID ProfileMartijn J. Schuemie, Evan P. Minty, View ORCID ProfileThamir M. Alshammari, Lana Y.H. Lai, View ORCID ProfileTalita Duarte-Salles, Stephen Fortin, View ORCID ProfileFredrik Nyberg, Patrick B. Ryan, George Hripcsak, View ORCID ProfileDaniel Prieto-Alhambra, View ORCID ProfileMarc A. Suchard
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.18.22271183
Faaizah Arshad
1Department of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics, New York, NY, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Faaizah Arshad
Martijn J. Schuemie
1Department of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics, New York, NY, USA
3Observational Health Data Analytics, Janssen R&D, Titusville, NJ, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Martijn J. Schuemie
Evan P. Minty
4O’Brien Institute for Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thamir M. Alshammari
5Medication Safety Research Chair, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thamir M. Alshammari
Lana Y.H. Lai
6Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Talita Duarte-Salles
7Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l’Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Talita Duarte-Salles
Stephen Fortin
3Observational Health Data Analytics, Janssen R&D, Titusville, NJ, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fredrik Nyberg
8School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Fredrik Nyberg
Patrick B. Ryan
2Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics, New York, NY, USA
3Observational Health Data Analytics, Janssen R&D, Titusville, NJ, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George Hripcsak
2Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics, New York, NY, USA
9Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, NY, NY, USA
10Medical Informatics Services, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, NY, NY, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
11Centre for Statistics in Medicine, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
12Health Data Sciences, Medical Informatics, Erasmus Medical Center University, Rotterdam, NL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
Marc A. Suchard
1Department of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics, New York, NY, USA
13Department of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
14VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marc A. Suchard
  • For correspondence: msuchard{at}ucla.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Vaccine safety surveillance commonly includes a serial testing approach with a sensitive method for “signal generation” and specific method for “signal validation.” Whether serially combining epidemiological designs improves both sensitivity and specificity is unknown.

Methods We assessed the overall performance of serial testing using three administrative claims and one electronic health record database. We compared Type I and II errors before and after empirical calibration for historical comparator, SCCS, and the serial combination of those designs against six vaccine exposure groups with 93 negative control and 279 imputed positive control outcomes.

Results Historical comparator mostly had lower Type II error than SCCS. SCCS had lower Type I error than the historical comparator. Before empirical calibration, serial combination increased specificity and decreased sensitivity. Type II errors mostly exceeded 50%. After empirical calibration, Type I errors returned to nominal; sensitivity was lowest when the methods were combined.

Conclusion We recommend against the serial approach in vaccine safety surveillance. While serial combination produced fewer false positive signals compared to the most specific method, it generated more false negative signals compared to the most sensitive method. Using the noisy historical comparator in front of SCCS deteriorated overall performance in evaluating safety signals.

Key Messages

  • Using the serial approach in vaccine safety surveillance did not improve overall performance: specificity increased but sensitivity decreased.

  • Without empirical calibration, Type II errors exceeded 50%; after empirical calibration, Type I error rates returned to nominal with negligible change to Type II error rates.

  • While prior research has suggested high sensitivity of the historical comparator method in distinguishing true safety signals, there were cases when self-controlled case series was more sensitive.

  • Vaccine safety surveillance is becoming increasingly important, so monitoring systems should closely consider the utility and sequence of epidemiological designs.

Competing Interest Statement

All authors have submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors disclosure form. FA declares no competing interests. MAS receives grant funding from the US National Institutes of Health and the US Food & Drug Administration and contracts from the US Department of Veterans Affairs and Janssen Research and Development. PBR, SF and MJS are employees of Janssen Research and Development and shareholders in Johnson & Johnson. GH receives grant funding from the US National Institutes of Health and the US Food & Drug Administration. DPAs research group has received grant support from Amgen, Chesi-Taylor, Novartis, and UCB Biopharma. His department has received advisory or consultancy fees from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Johnson, and Johnson, and UCB Biopharma and fees for speaker services from Amgen and UCB Biopharma. Janssen, on behalf of IMI-funded EHDEN and EMIF consortiums, and Synapse Management Partners have supported training programmes organised by DPAs department and open for external participants organized by his department outside submitted work. FN was an employee of AstraZeneca until 2019 and owns some AstraZeneca shares. EPM, LYHL, TMA, and TDS declare no competing interests.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health [grant number R01AI153044], a contract from the US Food & Drug Administration and an Intergovernmental Personnel Act agreement with the US Department of Veterans Affairs.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The protocol and analytical code underlying this manuscript are available in the Eumaeus Repository at https://github.com/ohdsi-studies/Eumaeus.

https://github.com/ohdsi-studies/Eumaeus

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 22, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Best of intent, worst of both worlds: why sequentially combining epidemiological designs does not improve signal detection in vaccine safety surveillance
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Best of intent, worst of both worlds: why sequentially combining epidemiological designs does not improve signal detection in vaccine safety surveillance
Faaizah Arshad, Martijn J. Schuemie, Evan P. Minty, Thamir M. Alshammari, Lana Y.H. Lai, Talita Duarte-Salles, Stephen Fortin, Fredrik Nyberg, Patrick B. Ryan, George Hripcsak, Daniel Prieto-Alhambra, Marc A. Suchard
medRxiv 2022.02.18.22271183; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.18.22271183
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Best of intent, worst of both worlds: why sequentially combining epidemiological designs does not improve signal detection in vaccine safety surveillance
Faaizah Arshad, Martijn J. Schuemie, Evan P. Minty, Thamir M. Alshammari, Lana Y.H. Lai, Talita Duarte-Salles, Stephen Fortin, Fredrik Nyberg, Patrick B. Ryan, George Hripcsak, Daniel Prieto-Alhambra, Marc A. Suchard
medRxiv 2022.02.18.22271183; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.18.22271183

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)