Abstract
It is noticeable that, because of the amount and quality of information exchanged and the criticality of the decisions guided by them, hospitals are considered as some of the most complex organizations in modern society. Evidencing it, emergency departments in hospitals are examples of such complex environments that need perfect integration among systems, people, departments, and data. The processes behind the Emergency Department (ED) routine cause a set of critical and time-dependent decision-making, which must consider several criteria related to organizational and clinical attributes. Based on the literature and worldwide initiatives related to managing complex organizations, an ED can be interpreted through the enterprise interoperability (EI) lens, a concept related to the capability of different systems to work collaboratively within and throughout the organization. Thus, this paper proposes a framework focusing on interoperability assessment in ED processes, where different actors need to interoperate. The proposed framework for Enterprise Interoperability Assessment (EIA) is based on multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods, considering organizational and clinical attributes of the ED. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation II (PROMETHEE II), in an integrated approach, were elected as the most appropriate multicriteria methods to support, respectively, diagnostic (interoperability assessment) and decisional (interoperability improvements) processes in this background. Last, to validate the framework proposed, a case study was carried out at a stroke unit in a University Hospital (UH) in the south of Brazil. The outcome inferred that the UH achieved the intermediate level of enterprise interoperability in stroke treatment, and Business and Information Technology concerns were found to be the priorities, which deserved greater efforts, to enhance interoperability.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2012000800012
Funding Statement
This work was supported by PUCPR for FWL [grant number 10189200859.3 https://www.pucpr.br/] by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for FP [grant number 88882.168715/2018- 01 https://www.gov.br/capes/pt-br] and by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development ? CNPq for EFRL [grant number 424965/20186, MCTIC/CNPq 28/2018 https://www.gov.br/cnpq]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, there was no need for ethics committee approval because there are no patients involved in this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files
