Silence is golden, by my measures still see: why cheap-but-noisy outcome measures can be more cost effective than gold standards

Benjamin Woolf, Hugo Pedder, Henry Rodriguez-Broadbent, Phil Edwards
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.17.22274839

Article Information

doi 
https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.17.22274839
History 
  • May 20, 2022.

Article Versions

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.

Author Information

  1. Benjamin Woolf1,2,3,*,
  2. Hugo Pedder4,
  3. Henry Rodriguez-Broadbent5 and
  4. Phil Edwards3
  1. 1Department of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  2. 2Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  3. 3Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
  4. 4Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  5. 5Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, UK
  1. ↵*Corresponding author; email: benjamin.woolf{at}bristol.ac.uk
Back to top
Posted May 20, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
Silence is golden, by my measures still see: why cheap-but-noisy outcome measures can be more cost effective than gold standards
Benjamin Woolf, Hugo Pedder, Henry Rodriguez-Broadbent, Phil Edwards
medRxiv 2022.05.17.22274839; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.17.22274839
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area