The effect of multigeneration history of suicidality on offspring’s neurodevelopment outcomes: evidence from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) cohort

Xue Wen, Diyang Qu, Guowei Wu, Dongyu Liu, Yuanyuan Wang, Zaixu Cui, Xiaoqian Zhang, Runsen Chen
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.24.22275547

Summary

Background Parent-child transmission of suicidal behaviors has been widely elucidated, while the three-generation family suicide risk paradigm remains to be explored. This longitudinal study aimed to examine the influences of family history of suicidality (FHoS) among two prior generations on offspring’s neurodevelopment.

Methods We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal study using the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study data collected from 2016 to 2021. Participants were allocated into four groups according to their parents’ (Generation 1 [G1]) and grandparents’ (Generation 2 [G2]) history of suicidality (G1−G2−; G1+G2−; G1−/G2+; G1+/G2+). We estimated adjusted associations between FHoS and offspring’s suicide ideation (SI), psychopathology, impulsivity and brain cortical volumes while controlling for age, sex, parental education, household income and marital status.

Findings A total of 11,875 children aged 9-10 years were observed from baseline to 3-year follow-up. Compared to G1-G2-, higher odds of SI were observed for G1-G2+ (OR=1·99, 95% CI [1·54-2·56]) and G1+G2+ (2·25 [1·46-3·47]) by child-report. Higher odds of SI were also observed for G1+G2- (1·54 [1·12-2·12]), G1-G2+ (2·57 [1·89-3·48]) and G1+G2+ (2·70 [1·60-4·56]) by caregiver-report. Higher odds for psychopathology were also observed (1·47 [1·11-1·96]; 3·33 [2·57-4·33]; 5·44 [3·42-8·66]), while higher family suicide risk was associated with high impulsivity (B=1·32 [0·48-2·17]; 2·24 [1·32-3·15]; 2·26 [0·47-4·05]). Offspring in G1+G2-had higher cortical volumes in 12 brain regions, including the bilateral insula, temporal regions and occipital regions, which were also significantly associated with their lifetime SI.

Discussion A cumulative risk pattern of FHoS in two prior generations was found for offspring’s neurodevelopmental outcomes. Earlier preventive interventions are warranted to weaken the familial transmission of suicidal risk.

Introduction

Suicide ideation (SI), which is always seen as the precursor of suicide attempt (SA),1 has been sharply increasing among children over the past decades.2 The global prevalence of SI among adolescents were 10%-17% from 2003 to 2015.3 Noteworthy, SI also has a long-lasting effect on children’s neurodevelopmental outcomes, including cognitive and emotional abilities.4–8 This may further transmit to adulthood and even lead to a high mortality risk,9 and a staggering toll on global public health. A 50-year meta-analysis systematically reviewed the multi-dimensional risk factors of SI,10 which highlighted the importance of family history of suicidality (FHoS). Additionally, child with a FHoS were more vulnerable compared to adolescents and adults11,12.

Several frameworks was been used to explain this transmission, including shared genetic predispositions,13 contagions,14 adverse environmental circumstances and imitation.15 Abundant population-based studies have provided detailed evidence for these explanations.16–26 Additionally, a neuroimaging study further explored the specific phenotypes resulted by FHoS, including reduced volumes in bilateral temporal regions, right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left putamen.27 However, the majority of previous intergenerational studies have focused on the parent-to-child transmission of suicidality, while the impact of other family members were commonly neglected. Children’s development is deeply rooted in the whole family and is also closely linked to other family members, especially for grandparents, who play a crucial role in children’s development both directly and indirectly.28 For instance, grandparents’ mental disorders could act on their grandchildren independently,29 or through the intermediate influence of parents.30 Nonetheless, to what extent the FHoS within three generations influences offspring’s SI and other neurodevelopment outcomes remains strikingly unknown, which greatly hinders the design of more cost-effective interventions in early stage.

Therefore, this study aimed to explore the longitudinal effects of FHoS within two prior generations on children’s self-report SI, their caregiver’s report of SI, and other development outcomes, including psychopathology and impulsivity. While the potential protective roles of sex and SES among these associations were also explored. We further investigate whether offspring’s cortical volumes were associated with grandparental suicidality, and its correlations to their lifetime SI.

Methods

Data sources

We conducted a retrospective, population-based, longitudinal study by leveraging large sample data in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) study.31 From the National Institutes of Health (NIH) website, we obtained data of “Curated Annual Released 4.0”, which included 11,875 children recruited from 22 sites across the United States in the baseline (2016-2018, aged 9-10 years), 11,224 individuals in the 1-year follow-up (2017-2019, aged 10-11 years), 10,413 individuals in the 2-year follow-up (2018-2020, aged 11-12 years) and 6,250 individuals in the 3-year follow-up (2019-2021, aged 12-13 years). The present study focused on the data at all these four time points. All written informed content from parents and verbal assent from children were available in this analysis. All procedures were approved by a centralized institutional review board (IRB) from the University of California, San Diego IRB. Each study site obtained approval from their local IRBs. During data collection and analysis, all the ethical regulations have been complied with.

Study sample

We included data of 11,875 children from baseline to 3-year follow up. Herein, demographic information was obtained from the caregiver-report demographics battery, including age, sex at birth, race/ethnicity, household marital status, parental education level and combined household income. The highest value of parental education was selected, then the original 21 different response options were re-coded into 5 levels (Less than High School, High School Graduate/GED, Some College, Associate’s/Bachelor’s Degree and Postgraduate Degree). It was further re-coded into 2 categories (Less than college, College and above) for preliminary analysis. The original nine different response options of household income were also re-coded into three levels (<50K, ≥50K&<100K, ≥100K) for further analysis. These transformations were aimed to simplify our statistical models without losing nuance and have already been implemented in previous studies32,33. Since parental education level and household income are widely used indicators of family socioeconomic status (SES)34, they were combined to define low SES and high SES (appendix).

Exposures

The Family History Assessment Module Screener (FHMH-S) questionnaire reports the presence/absence(+/-) of a range of mental health symptoms including SA or suicide death in all 1st and 2nd degree “blood relatives” of the child35. The total score of FHoS was obtained by summing the histories from paternal grandparents, maternal grandparents and parents. The types of combination were further considered to generate a new 2×2 variable (G1-G2-; G1+G2-; G1-G2+; G1+G2+), which reflects both the density and distance of offspring suicide exposure genetically and environmentally. Among these variables, G1 represents the presence of grandparents’ FHoS, and G2 represents of the presence of parents’ FHoS (appendix p 1).

Outcomes

The suicide module of the computerized Kiddle Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (KSADS, Lifetime version) was used to assessed participants’ SI at present or in the past. Specifically, SI includes passive SI, non-specific active SI, active SI with method, active SI with intent and active SI with plan. In addition, the youth-report and caregiver-report version of KSADS were used simultaneously. The youth-report data was collected at all four data collection points, while the caregiver-report data was only available in baseline and 2-year follow-up assessment.

Offspring problematic behaviors over the past 6 months were accessed by parent-report data from the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL; age 6 to 18 form).36 The CBCL is a 3-point Likert-scale with response options of 0 (“not true”), 1 (“somewhat or sometimes true”), and 2 (“very true or often true”). It is used to judge the extent to which the problematic behaviors characterize their children. Then the total score was re-coded as being within (<60) versus above the threshold for borderline clinical significance, as previously defined37,38. Data from baseline, 1-year, 2-year and 3-year follow-up assessment was selected for further analysis.

Offspring trait impulsivity was measured by the short version of the UPPS-P self-report scale.39 Children rated on 4-point Likert-type scale among 1 (“Not at all like me”), 2 (“Not like me”), 3 (“Somewhat like me”), or 4 (“Very much like me”). In addition, the total score was converted to z-scores using a Fisher’s R to Z transformation. Children with a total score lower or higher than 3 SDs from the total group mean were excluded as outliers. Data from baseline and 2-year follow-up assessment was selected for further analysis. As for offspring brain structures, only baseline assessment was selected.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 26.0). In the preliminary analyses, the prevalence of offspring SI over the 4 years among different demographic backgrounds and family suicidal backgrounds was first examined using cross-tabulations. We then estimated the predictive associations between the factors above and offspring SI in a series of binomial regression models. Odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were presented to explain the results, especially for the association between number of FHoS and offspring SI reported by child and caregiver separately. We then conducted a series of analyses around different types of FHoS (G1-G2-; G1+G2-; G1-G2+; G1+G2+). Propensity-score-matched (PSM) analysis was used to account for the sample size differences in the G1-G2- and other three groups and to minimize selection bias. Then generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to obtain the adjusted relative risks of SI, psychopathology and impulsivity in preadolescents with FHoS. Multi-variable regression models were constructed a priori to adjust for the effect of important confound variables: age, sex at birth, race/ethnicity, household marital status, parental education level, household income and site. We continued to test whether the child’s sex at birth and SES modified the associations between FHoS and child prevalence of SI and other development outcomes in the final interaction analysis. The detailed descriptions of the methods above were shown in the appendix. Subgroup analysis were further conducted between G1+G2- and G1-G2-. FreeSurfer v5.3 (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu) was used to process the locally acquired T1-weighted images, and estimate global and regional gray matter volume, while Desikan-Killiany atlas was used to generate 74 cortical parcellations within each hemisphere.40 The volumes in left and right hemispheres were added for each region. In the general linear models, which included covariates selected a priori, t-statistics was estimated across these regions. Total volumes of the interested regions were final calculated, then correlated to offspring SI among G1+G2-.

Results

The total study sample of 11,875 children were observed over 4 years. Altogether, 2,309 (19.4%) children self-reported the presence of SI. Herein, female (OR=1.13, 95% CI [1.03-1.24]), unmarried families (OR=1.18, 95% CI [1.05-1.33]), low household income (OR=1.20, 95% CI [1.04-1.40]) and high parental education level (OR=1.16, 95%CI [1.01-1.32]) were associated with significantly increased odds of offspring SI. Specifically, a dose-response relationship was observed between number of FHoS and offspring SI, as the number of FHoS increase, the relative odds of offspring SI also increase. A similar, although less consistent pattern is shown in SI reported by caregiver, with only 1,420 (12.0%) children were reported to have SI (Table 1).

View this table:
Table 1: Characteristics of offspring with SI and logistic regression outcomes

Baseline characteristics of the population after PSM analysis were summarized in Table 2. The present study included 1,848 out of 11,875 children for further GEE analysis, in which the reference group (G1-G2-, N=924) were 1:1 matched with the other 3 group. Among them, 887 (48.0%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 9.9 (0.6) year. Other demographic characteristics were distributed across the 4-risk types.

View this table:
Table 2: Demographic characteristics of sample by 4-risk types of FHoS after PSM.

GEE models revealed that parental and grandparental SA or suicide death is significantly associated with increased odds of subsequent SI in offspring. By child reports, the odds of SI were 1.99 (95%CI [1.54-2.56]) times higher in G1-G2+ and 2.25 (95%CI [1.46-3.47]) times higher in G1+G2+ compared to G1-G2-after adjusted. By caregiver reports, the odds of SI were 1.54 (95%CI [1.12-2.12]) times higher in G1+G2-, 2.57 (95%CI [1.89-3.48]) times higher in G1-G2+ and 2.70(95%CI [1.60-4.56]) times higher in G1+G2+ after adjustment. Furthermore, the prevalence of offspring SI reported by themselves decreased among the 4 years but with some dampening of the trend (Fig 1). For example, the prevalence of SI was 10.8% in baseline, 8.8% in 1-year follow up, 8.5% in 2-year follow up while 14.8% in 3-year follow up. Moreover, the main effect of sex and SES is not significant, yet sex at birth (χ2=34.27; p<0.001) and SES (χ2=37.30; p<0.001) moderated the association between FHoS and offspring SI by child reports. While by caregiver reports, boys (mean, 0.15; SE, 0.014) had higher prevalence of SI than girls (mean, 0.11; SE, 0.011). Sex at birth (χ2=50.16; p<0.001) and SES (χ2=37.65; p<0.001) also moderated the association between FHoS and offspring SI (Fig 2).

Figure1:
Figure1:

Offspring developmental outcomes among 4 years by family suicide risk

Figure2:
Figure2:

Sex and SES moderated the association between FHoS and offspring’s SI

FHoS also predicted clinically relevant psychopathology in offspring (Table 3). Higher likelihood to have psychopathological behaviors was observed with increased levels of FHoS. The odds ratio is 1.47 (95%CI [1.11-1.96]) in G1+G2-, 3.33(95%CI [2.57-4.33]) in G1-G2+ and 5.44 (95%CI [3.42-8.66]) in G1+G2+ compared to G1-G2-. There was no time effect in the analysis (Fig 2). Additionally, girls (mean, 50.07; SE, 0.55) performed more psychopathic behaviors than boys (mean, 47.18; SE, 0.52), while offspring in low SES (mean, 49.94; SE, 0.49) also showed more psychopathic behaviors than in high SES (mean, 47.19; SE, 0.62). Sex at birth (χ2=142.52; p<0.001) and SES (χ2=142.52; p<0.001) moderated the association between FHoS and offspring psychopathology (Fig 3).

View this table:
Table 3: Increased family suicide risk on offspring’s SI and psychopathology
Figure3:
Figure3:

Sex and SES moderated the association between FHoS and offspring’s psychopathology and impulsivity

There was also evidence for higher impulsivity in children with FHoS (Table 4). Compared to G1-G2-, G1+G2- (B=1·32, 95%CI [0·48-2·17]), G1-G2+ (B=2·24, 95%CI [1·32-3·15]) and G1+G2+ (B=2·26, 95%CI [0·47-4·05]) were associated with higher impulsivity. Meanwhile, time effect was observed since lower impulsivity is measured in 2-year follow up (mean, 40.49; SE, 0.29) than baseline (mean, 42.05; SE, 0.27). There is no FHoS by time interaction in the model. Furthermore, boys (mean, 42.43; SE, 0.34) had higher trait impulsivity than girls (mean, 40.24; SE, 0.33), despite that the main effect of SES is not significant. Sex at birth (χ2=79.15; p<0.001) and SES (χ2=39.98; p<0.001) moderated the association between FHoS and offspring trait impulsivity (Fig 3).

View this table:
Table 4: Increased family suicide risk on offspring’s impulsivity

In comparison to G1-G2-, 12 significant differences across the 74 cortical regions were found after false discovery rate (FDR) correction, all indicating increased brain volumes among children in G1+G2-, of which the strongest difference was the volume of the superior segment of the circular sulcus of the insula (t=12.89, PFDR<0.001). Meanwhile, total volumes of these 12 regions were negatively correlated to offspring SI both by child-report (r=-0.136, P=0.005) and by caregiver-report (r=-0.115, p=0.018) (Fig 4).

Figure4:
Figure4: Representative regions with higher volumes in offspring with grandparental suicidality

A. Increased cortical volumes were found among G1+G2 compared to G1-G2- in 12 regions (sum of left and right hemisphere), while covarying for age, sex, race/ethnicity, household marital status, parental highest education and household income. These representative regions have been projected onto the surface of the brain for better visualization. B. Representative regions and their corresponding T values are shown in the bar chart. S.circular.insula.sup=superior segment of the circular sulcus of the insula; S.oc-temp.lat= lateral occipito-temporal sulcus; G.and.S.transv.frontopol=transverse frontopolar gyri and sulci; G.cingul-Post-dorsal=posterior-dorsal part of the cingulate gyrus; G.temp.sup-Plan.polar=planum polare of the superior temporal gyrus; Lat.Fis-ant-Vertical= vertical ramus of the anterior segment of the lateral sulcus; G.precentral=precentral gyrus; G.and.S.occipital.inf=inferior occipital gyrus and sulcus; Lat.Fis-post= posterior ramus of the lateral sulcus; G.temporal.inf=inferior temporal gyrus; Pole.temporal=temporal pole; G.orbital= orbital gyri.

Discussion

This study addresses the gap of multigeneration transmission of suicidal risks through three key findings. Firstly, the increasing number of family history of suicidality across generations predicts higher level of offspring’s SI and development outcomes. Specifically, having at least one grandparent and parent with SA or suicide death indicates the highest prevalence of SI and the highest level of psychopathology and impulsivity in offspring. Secondly, sex at birth and SES moderated the relationship between FHoS and offspring’s SI, problematic behaviors and impulsivity. Thirdly, higher regional cortical volumes in offspring with grandparental suicidality were found, especially for insula, while the sum of these 12 regions were negatively associated with offspring SI. Together, these results provide evidence for the effect of FHoS on offspring’s neurodevelopment, as well as the brain-structure-related determinants of the intergenerational transmission of suicidality.

Our findings of the highest risk for offspring’s SI, psychopathology and impulsivity in G1+G2+ clarify how the interaction between parental and grandparental SA or suicide death influences offspring mental health status. Since the addictive model and the multiplicative model are widely used to assess complex interactions of two (or more) different exposures,41 while there is also evidence suggesting that risk patterns for multigenerational psychiatric disorders follow the addictive model.29,42–45 Thus, our study validates the cumulative risk pattern for FHoS. On the basis of parent-child transmission of suicidality, we found that exposure to parental suicidality was not the most dangerous risk factor. Indeed, the longer the time distances spanned through multi-generations, the more the child is influenced by FHoS, as the highest prevalence of SI was reported among preadolescents in G1+G2+, which still increased continuously during the transition to adolescents.

The intergenerational transmission could be explained by shared genes, and a recent molecular genetic study have already identified single nucleotide polymorphisms for the transmission of SA.46 Therefore it is reasonable to infer that having multiple generations attempted or suicide death may prompt higher genetic loadings for suicide. Despite the genetic predispositions, the transmission of suicide could also be linked with the transmission of psychopathology and impulsivity,47–49 which are always seen as predictors of SI in children and adolescents.50–53 Since children with FHoS may have an earlier understanding of suicide and related concepts, and develop the impulsive personality traits and psychopathological behavior characteristics when spending time with their grandparents and parents. Otherwise, offspring’s trait impulsivity tend to decrease over the course of their development, as shown in a prior study.54

Our findings validate sex-specific and SES-specific influence in the pathway linking FHoS to offspring’s mental health status. By child reports, our work demonstrated that females were at a particularly higher risk for having SI when exposed to FHoS, which mirrors a previous study.17 This is partly because females were more affected by maternal mental health problems since they have more emotional interactions with their mothers.55 On the contrary, males were more likely to exhibit psychopathological behaviors and trait impulsivity when exposed to FHoS in our analysis, which could be explained by stronger heritability of problematic performances,56 and impulsivity in males.57 Meanwhile, offspring with a low SES tends to be more vulnerable to FHoS. Since individuals with a lower SES tend to receive less developmental resources and experience more negative conditions for maintaining mental health,58,59 they are more likely to develop mental health problems and psychopathological behaviors.60,61 There are also strong intergeneration associations in SES which might also explain our results.62 Future research should further consider the potential impact of different geographic, ecological and cultural contexts, especially for the cultural differences between the West and the East.63

Our findings demonstrate the role of the insula and other cortical regions in the intergenerational transmission of suicidality. Prior studies have elucidated neuroanatomic regions involved in suicidality, while the insula had been identified as a key neurobiology basis of suicide64–69. As previously suggested, the insula was involved in emotion and interoceptive processing,70 cognitive control and self-recognition71, thus leading to a crucial role in SI69. We inferred that the effect of grandparental suicidality on offspring SI might be associated with the change of insula. While future studies need to examine our findings through a longitudinal design in order to access causal effects and identify reliable biological risk markers for suicidality.

Nevertheless, this study also has several limitations. Firstly, due to our novel grouping design for FHoS, the number of SA in each group was too small to be included, while the incidence of G1+G2+ was also relatively low. Therefore, future studies should validate our findings within a large cohort. Secondly, PSM was used to make the statistical analysis of the differences between groups more reasonable, but it may also make the G1-G2-group deviate from its true distribution. Moreover, the results of this study showed partly separate trends under parent- and child-reported SI, consistent with prior studies. Future studies could develop specific algorithms to integrate the results of both interviews to obtain a diagnosis closer to clinicians.72 Finally, other protective factors between FHoS and offspring psychopathological symptoms and disorders should be explored in future. Notwithstanding these drawbacks, our study has the following clinical implications. Herein, early identification of FHoS as suicide risk factor among preadolescent is imperative to break the cycle of suicide transmission, which is helpful to the design of cost-effective interventions in early stage, though there were striking few interventional studies related.73 Future interventions should also consider children’s higher psychopathology and impulsivity at the same time, and the way to reduce these symptoms. Relatively, psychopathological problems in offspring with a FHoS could also serve to inform interventions for these high-risk families.74 Otherwise, inclusion of grandparental suicidal experiences also helped detecting candidates for biomarkers studies earlier.45

To conclude, the results of the study show transmission of suicidality in three-generation with an addictive pattern, indicating that the higher psychopathology and impulsivity should be alerted imperatively in clinical settings due to their predictive effect on offspring SI with FHoS. Our study also supports that family history approach is efficient in mapping intergeneration family risk to a population-based study, which is generalizable across different sociodemographic characteristics.42 Thus future neuroimaging studies could be conducted to detect biomarkers for FHoS at an early stage.

Data Availability

All data produced are available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.15154/1523041.

Contributors

WX, QD, CZ, ZX and RC designed the study. WX and WG assisted data cleaning. WX, QD analysis the data. WX, DQ, CZ, RC, ZX, WY interpret data. WX and QD wrote the first draft of the manuscript. WX and WG made the figures. RC, LD, CZ, QD revised the manuscript critically. All authors contributed feedback and approved the final manuscript.

Declaration of interests

We declare no competing interests

Acknowledgments

Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the ABCD Study (https://abcdstudy.org), and are held in the NIMH Data Archive (NDA). This is a multisite, longitudinal study designed to recruit more than 10,000 children age 9-10 and follow them over 10 years into early adulthood. The ABCD Study is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)and additional federal partners under award numbers U01DA0401048, U01DA050989, U01DA051016, U01DA041022, U01DA051018, U01DA051037, U01DA050987, U01DA041174, U01DA041106, U01DA041117, U01DA041028, U01DA041134, U01DA050988, U01DA051039, U01DA041156, U01DA041025, U01DA041120, U01DA051038, U01DA041148, U01DA041093, U01DA041089, U24DA041123, U24DA041147. A full list of supporters is available at https://abcdstudy.org/federal-partners.html. A listing of participating sites and a complete listing of the study investigators can be found at https://abcdstudy.org/principal-investigators/. ABCD consortium investigators designed and implemented the study and/or provided data but did not necessarily participate in analysis or writing of this report. This manuscript reflects the views of the authors and may not reflect the opinions or views of the NIH or ABCD consortium investigators. The ABCD repository grows and changes over time. The ABCD data used in this report came from http://dx.doi.org/10.15154/1523041. DOIs can be found at nda.nih.gov.

References

  1. ↵
    Klonsky ED, Saffer By, Bryan CJ. Ideation-to-action theories of suicide: a conceptual and empirical update. Cur Opin Psychol 2018; 22: 38–43.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    Hawton K, Saunders KE, O’Connor RC. Self-harm and suicide in adolescents. The Lancet 2012; 379: 2373–2382.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    Biswas T, Scott JG, Munir K, Renzaho AM, Rawal LB, Baxter J et al. Global variation in the prevalence of suicidal ideation, anxiety and their correlates among adolescents: a population based study of 82 countries. EClinicalMedicine 2020; 24: 100395.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    Huber RS, Sheth C, Renshaw PF, Yurgelun-Todd DA, McGlade EC. Suicide Ideation and Neurocognition Among 9- and 10-Year Old Children in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. Arch Suicide Res 2020; : 1–15.
  5. Barzilay R, Calkins ME, Moore TM, Boyd RC, Jones JD, Benton TD et al. Neurocognitive functioning in community youth with suicidal ideation: gender and pubertal effects. Br J Psychiatry 2019; 215: 552–558.
    OpenUrl
  6. Copeland WE, Goldston DB, Costello EJ. Adult associations of childhood suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a prospective, longitudinal analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2017; 56: 958–965.
    OpenUrl
  7. Herba CM, Ferdinand RF, Verhulst FC. Long-term associations of childhood suicide ideation. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007; 46: 1473–1481.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Hill SY, Jones BL, Haas GL. Suicidal ideation and aggression in childhood, genetic variation and young adult depression. J Afect Disord 2020; 276: 954–962.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    King CA, Arango A, Kramer A, Busby D, Czyz E, Foster CE et al. Association of the youth-nominated support team intervention for suicidal adolescents with 11-to 14-year mortality outcomes: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2019; 76: 492–498.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    Franklin JC, Ribeiro JD, Fox KR, Bentley KH, Kleiman EM, Huang X et al. Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Psychol Bul 2017; 143: 187.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    Geulayov G, Gunnell D, Holmen T, Metcalfe C. The association of parental fatal and non-fatal suicidal behaviour with offspring suicidal behaviour and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2012; 42: 1567–1580.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    Del Carpio L, Paul S, Paterson A, Rasmussen S. A systematic review of controlled studies of suicidal and self-harming behaviours in adolescents following bereavement by suicide. PLoS One 2021; 16: e0254203.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Prichard JC. A treatise on insanity and other disorders afecting the mind. Haswell, Barrington, and Haswell, 1837.
  14. ↵
    Haw C, Hawton K, Niedzwiedz C, Platt S. Suicide clusters: a review of risk factors and mechanisms. Suicide Life-Threatening Behav 2013; 43: 97–108.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    Brent DA, Melhem N. Familial transmission of suicidal behavior. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2008; 31: 157–177.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Ranning A, Madsen T, Hawton K, Nordentoft M, Erlangsen A. Transgenerational concordance in parent-to-child transmission of suicidal behaviour: a retrospective, nationwide, register-based cohort study of 4 419 642 individuals in Denmark. Lancet Psychiatry 2022; 9: 363–374.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    Bakian AV, Chen D, Zhang C, Hanson HA, Docherty AR, Keeshin B et al. A population-wide analysis of the familial risk of suicide in Utah, USA. Psychol Med 2021; : 1–10.
  18. Ortin-Peralta A, Keski-Säntti M, Gissler M, Veijola J, Sourander A, Duarte CS. Parental suicide attempts and offspring’s risk of attempting or dying by suicide: does the timing of a parental suicide attempt matter? Psychol Med 2021; : 1–10.
  19. Ranning A, Uddin MJ, Sørensen HJ, Laursen TM, Thorup AA, Madsen T et al. Intergenerational transmission of suicide attempt in a cohort of 4.4 million children. Psychol Med 2021; : 1–8.
  20. Kendler KS, Ohlsson H, Sundquist J, Sundquist K, Edwards AC. The sources of parent-child transmission of risk for suicide attempt and deaths by suicide in Swedish national samples. Am J Psychiatry 2020; 177: 928–935.
    OpenUrl
  21. O’Reilly LM, Kuja-Halkola R, Rickert ME, Class QA, Larsson H, Lichtenstein P et al. The intergenerational transmission of suicidal behavior: an offspring of siblings study. Transl Psychiatry 2020; 10: 173.
    OpenUrl
  22. Geulayov G, Metcalfe C, Heron J, Kidger J, Gunnell D. Parental Suicide Attempt and Offspring Self-Harm and Suicidal Thoughts: Results From the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) Birth Cohort. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2014; 53: 509-517.e2.
    OpenUrl
  23. Tidemalm D, Runeson B, Waern M, Frisell T, Carlström E, Lichtenstein P et al. Familial clustering of suicide risk: a total population study of 11.4 million individuals. Psychol Med 2011; 41: 2527–2534.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. Gureje O, Oladeji B, Hwang I, Chiu WT, Kessler RC, Sampson NA et al. Parental psychopathology and the risk of suicidal behavior in their offspring: results from the World Mental Health surveys. Mol Psychiatry 2011; 16: 1221–1233.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. Kuramoto SJ, Stuart EA, Runeson B, Lichtenstein P, Långström N, Wilcox HC. Maternal or paternal suicide and offspring’s psychiatric and suicide-attempt hospitalization risk. Pediatrics 2010; 126: e1026–e1032.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Wilcox HC, Kuramoto SJ, Lichtenstein P, Långström N, Brent DA, Runeson B. Psychiatric morbidity, violent crime, and suicide among children and adolescents exposed to parental death. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2010; 49: 514–523.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    Jollant F, Wagner G, Richard-Devantoy S, Köhler S, Bär K-J, Turecki G et al. Neuroimaging-informed phenotypes of suicidal behavior: a family history of suicide and the use of a violent suicidal means. Transl Psychiatry 2018; 8: 120.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    Hancock KJ, Mitrou F, Shipley M, Lawrence D, Zubrick SR. A three generation study of the mental health relationships between grandparents, parents and children. BMC Psychiatry 2013; 13: 1–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Weissman MM, Wickramaratne P, Nomura Y, Warner V, Verdeli H, Pilowsky DJ et al. Families at high and low risk for depression: a 3-generation study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62: 29–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    Johnston DW, Schurer S, Shields MA. Evidence on the long shadow of poor mental health across three generations. 2011.
  31. ↵
    Casey BJ, Cannonier T, Conley MI, Cohen AO, Barch DM, Heitzeg MM et al. The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2018; 32: 43–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Assari S, Islam S. Diminished Protective Effects of Household Income on Internalizing Symptoms among African American than European American Pre-Adolescents. J Econ Trade Mark Manag 2020; 2: 38.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    Dennis E, Manza P, Volkow ND. Socioeconomic status, BMI, and brain development in children. Transl Psychiatry 2022; 12: 33.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    Barch DM, Gotlib IH, Bilder RM, Pine DS, Smoller JW, Brown CH et al. Common measures for National Institute of Mental Health funded research. Biol Psychiatry 2016; 79: e91–e96.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    Rice JP, Reich T, Bucholz KK, Neuman RJ, Fishman R, Rochberg N et al. Comparison of direct interview and family history diagnoses of alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1995; 19: 1018–1023.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    Achenbach TM, Ruffle TM. The Child Behavior Checklist and related forms for assessing behavioral/emotional problems and competencies. Pediatr Rev 2000; 21: 265–271.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Mazefsky CA, Anderson R, Conner CM, Minshew N. Child behavior checklist scores for school-aged children with autism: Preliminary evidence of patterns suggesting the need for referral. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 2011; 33: 31–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Roffman JL, Sipahi ED, Dowling KF, Hughes DE, Hopkinson CE, Lee H et al. Association of adverse prenatal exposure burden with child psychopathology in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. PloS One 2021; 16: e0250235.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    Cyders MA, Smith GT, Spillane NS, Fischer S, Annus AM, Peterson C. Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: development and validation of a measure of positive urgency. Psychol Assess 2007; 19: 107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 2006; 31: 968–980.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    VanderWeele TJ, Knol MJ. A Tutorial on Interaction. Epidemiol Methods 2014; 3. doi:10.1515/em-2013-0005.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. ↵
    van Dijk MT, Murphy E, Posner JE, Talati A, Weissman MM. Association of Multigenerational Family History of Depression With Lifetime Depressive and Other Psychiatric Disorders in Children: Results from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. JAMA Psychiatry 2021; 78: 778.
    OpenUrl
  43. Pettit JW, Olino TM, Roberts RE, Seeley JR, Lewinsohn PM. Intergenerational transmission of internalizing problems: Effects of parental and grandparental major depressive disorder on child behavior. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2008; 37: 640–650.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. Warner V, Weissman MM, Mufson L, Wickramaratne PJ. Grandparents, parents, and grandchildren at high risk for depression: a three-generation study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999; 38: 289–296.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    Weissman MM, Berry OO, Warner V, Gameroff MJ, Skipper J, Talati A et al. A 30-year study of 3 generations at high risk and low risk for depression. JAMA Psychiatry 2016; 73: 970– 977.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    Erlangsen A, Appadurai V, Wang Y, Turecki G, Mors O, Werge T et al. Genetics of suicide attempts in individuals with and without mental disorders: a population-based genome-wide association study. Mol Psychiatry 2020; 25: 2410–2421.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    Brent DA, Mann JJ. Family genetic studies, suicide, and suicidal behavior. Wiley Online Library, 2005, pp 13–24.
  48. Zalsman G, Levy T, Shoval G. Interaction of child and family psychopathology leading to suicidal behavior. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2008; 31: 237–246.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Bronisch T, Lieb R. Maternal suicidality and suicide risk in offspring. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2008; 31: 213–221.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Chahine M, Salameh P, Haddad C, Sacre H, Soufia M, Akel M et al. Suicidal ideation among Lebanese adolescents: scale validation, prevalence and correlates. BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20: 1–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. Tan L, Xia T, Reece C. Social and individual risk factors for suicide ideation among Chinese children and adolescents: A multilevel analysis. Int J Psychol 2018; 53: 117–125.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  52. Sarkisian KL, Van Hulle CA, Hill Goldsmith H. Brooding, inattention, and impulsivity as predictors of adolescent suicidal ideation. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2019; 47: 333–344.
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    Mars B, Heron J, Klonsky ED, Moran P, O’Connor RC, Tilling K et al. Predictors of future suicide attempt among adolescents with suicidal thoughts or non-suicidal self-harm: a population-based birth cohort study. Lancet Psychiatry 2019; 6: 327–337.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    Harden KP, Tucker-Drob EM. Individual differences in the development of sensation seeking and impulsivity during adolescence: further evidence for a dual systems model. Dev Psychol 2011; 47: 739.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    Goodman SH, Rouse MH, Connell AM, Broth MR, Hall CM, Heyward D. Maternal depression and child psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2011; 14: 1–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    Braungart-Rieker J, Rende RD, Plomin R, DeFries J, Fulker DW. Genetic mediation of longitudinal associations between family environment and childhood behavior problems. Dev Psychopathol 1995; 7: 233–245.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    Bezdjian S, Baker LA, Tuvblad C. Genetic and environmental influences on impulsivity: a meta-analysis of twin, family and adoption studies. Clin Psychol Rev 2011; 31: 1209–1223.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    Conger RD, Conger KJ, Martin MJ. Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development. J Mariage Fam 2010; 72: 685–704.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    Bradley RH, Corwyn RF. Socioeconomic status and child development. Annu Rev Psychol 2002; 53: 371–399.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. ↵
    Haveman R, Wolfe B. The determinants of children’s attainments: A review of methods and findings. J Econ Lit 1995; 33: 1829–1878.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  61. ↵
    Bøe T, Sivertsen B, Heiervang E, Goodman R, Lundervold AJ, Hysing M. Socioeconomic status and child mental health: The role of parental emotional well-being and parenting practices. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2014; 42: 705–715.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    Black SE, Devereux PJ. Recent developments in intergenerational mobility. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2010.
  63. ↵
    Chen PJ, MacKes N, Sacchi C, Lawrence A, Ma X, Pollard R et al. Parental education and youth suicidal behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2022; 31.
  64. ↵
    Hwang J-P, Lee T-W, Tsai S-J, Chen T-J, Yang C-H, Lirng J-F et al. Cortical and subcortical abnormalities in late-onset depression with history of suicide attempts investigated with MRI and voxel-based morphometry. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2010; 23: 171–184.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. Baek K, Kwon J, Chae J-H, Chung YA, Kralik JD, Min J-A et al. Heightened aversion to risk and loss in depressed patients with a suicide attempt history. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 1–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. Kang S-G, Na K-S, Choi J-W, Kim J-H, Son Y-D, Lee YJ. Resting-state functional connectivity of the amygdala in suicide attempters with major depressive disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2017; 77: 222–227.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  67. Li H, Chen Z, Gong Q, Jia Z. Voxel-wise meta-analysis of task-related brain activation abnormalities in major depressive disorder with suicide behavior. BrainImaging Behav 2020; 14: 1298–1308.
    OpenUrl
  68. Bani-Fatemi A, Tasmim S, Graff-Guerrero A, Gerretsen P, Strauss J, Kolla N et al. Structural and functional alterations of the suicidal brain: an updated review of neuroimaging studies. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 2018; 278: 77–91.
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    Schmaal L, van Harmelen A-L, Chatzi V, Lippard ET, Toenders YJ, Averill LA et al. Imaging suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a comprehensive review of 2 decades of neuroimaging studies. Mol Psychiatry 2020; 25: 408–427.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    Gasquoine PG. Contributions of the insula to cognition and emotion. Neuropsychol Rev 2014; 24: 77–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    Nieuwenhuys R. The insular cortex: a review. Prog Brain Res 2012; 195: 123–163.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  72. ↵
    Townsend L, Kobak K, Kearney C, Milham M, Andreotti C, Escalera J et al. Development of three web-based computerized versions of the kiddie schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia child psychiatric diagnostic interview: preliminary validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2020; 59: 309–325.
    OpenUrl
  73. ↵
    Lunde I, Myhre Reigstad M, Frisch Moe K, Grimholt TK. Systematic literature review of attempted suicide and offspring. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15: 937.
    OpenUrl
  74. ↵
    Goodday S, Shuldiner J, Bondy S, Rhodes A. Exposure to parental psychopathology and offspring’s risk of suicide-related thoughts and behaviours: a systematic review. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2019; 28: 179–190.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top
Posted May 25, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email
The effect of multigeneration history of suicidality on offspring’s neurodevelopment outcomes: evidence from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) cohort
Xue Wen, Diyang Qu, Guowei Wu, Dongyu Liu, Yuanyuan Wang, Zaixu Cui, Xiaoqian Zhang, Runsen Chen
medRxiv 2022.05.24.22275547; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.24.22275547
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area