Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Deep Learning vs manual techniques for assessing left ventricular ejection fraction in 2D echocardiography: validation against CMR

View ORCID ProfileEric Saloux, Alexandre Popoff, Hélène Langet, Paolo Piro, Camille Ropert, Romane Gauriau, Romain Stettler, Mihaela Silvia Amzulescu, Guillaume Pizaine, Pascal Allain, Olivier Bernard, Amir Hodzic, Alain Manrique, View ORCID ProfileMathieu De Craene, Bernhard L. Gerber
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.26.22278059
Eric Saloux
aCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie, France
bEA 4650, Caen University, FHU REMOD-VHF, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eric Saloux
  • For correspondence: saloux-e{at}chu-caen.fr
Alexandre Popoff
cPhilips Research, Medical Imaging (Medisys), Suresnes, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hélène Langet
dPhilips Clinical Research Board, Suresnes, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paolo Piro
cPhilips Research, Medical Imaging (Medisys), Suresnes, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Camille Ropert
aCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Romane Gauriau
cPhilips Research, Medical Imaging (Medisys), Suresnes, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Romain Stettler
aCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mihaela Silvia Amzulescu
eCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc UCL, Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guillaume Pizaine
cPhilips Research, Medical Imaging (Medisys), Suresnes, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pascal Allain
cPhilips Research, Medical Imaging (Medisys), Suresnes, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivier Bernard
fCREATIS, CNRS UMR5220, Inserm U1044, INSA-Lyon, University of Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amir Hodzic
aCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alain Manrique
aCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie, France
bEA 4650, Caen University, FHU REMOD-VHF, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mathieu De Craene
cPhilips Research, Medical Imaging (Medisys), Suresnes, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mathieu De Craene
Bernhard L. Gerber
eCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc UCL, Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Structured Abstract

Objective To evaluate accuracy and reproducibility of 2D echocardiography (2DE) left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (LVEF) estimates by Deep Learning (DL) vs. manual contouring and against CMR.

Background 2DE LV manual segmentation for LV volumes and LVEF calculation is time consuming and operator dependent.

Methods A DL-based convolutional network (DL1) was trained on 2DE data from centre A, then evaluated on 171 subjects with a wide range of cardiac conditions (49 healthy) – 31 subjects from centre A (18%) and 140 subjects from centre B (82%) – who underwent 2DE and CMR on the same day. Two senior (A1 and B1) and one junior (A2) cardiologists manually contoured 2DE end-diastolic (ED) and end-systolic (ES) endocardial borders in the cycle and frames of their choice. Selected frames were automatically segmented by DL1 and two DL algorithms from the literature (DL2 and DL3), applied without adaptation to verify their generalizability to unseen data. Interobserver variability of DL was compared to manual contouring. All ESV, EDV and EF values were compared to CMR as reference.

Results 50% of 2DE images were of good quality. Interobserver agreement was better by DL1 and DL2 than by manual contouring for EF (Lin’s concordance = 0.9 and 0.91 vs. 0.84), EDV (0.98 and 0.99 vs. 0.82), and ESV (0.99 and 0.99 vs. 0.89). LVEF bias was similar or reduced using DL1 (-0.1) vs. manual contouring (3.0), and worse for DL2 and DL3. Agreement between 2DE and CMR LVEF was similar or higher for DL1 vs. manual contouring (Cohen’s kappa = 0.65 vs. 0.61) and degraded for DL2 and DL3 (0.48 and 0.29).

Conclusion DL contouring yielded accurate EF measurements and generalized well to unseen data, while reducing interobserver variability. This suggests that DL contouring may improve accuracy and reproducibility of 2DE LVEF in routine practice.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work. Alexandre Popoff (AP), Mathieu De Craene (MDC), Guillaume Pizaine GP) and Pascal Allain (PA) are employed by Philips Medical Systems. Hélène Langet (HL), Romane Gauriau (RG) and Paulo Piro (PP) were employed by Philips Medical Systems at the time of the study. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caen Normandie and Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc have a master research agreement with Philips France Commercial.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The studies were approved by the IRB in charge (either Comité Ethique Hospital- Facultaire de l’Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium or Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord-Ouest III, Caen, France). The retrospective use of these data satisfies the European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requirements.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Relation with Industry Disclosure: AP, MDC, GP and PA are employed by Philips Medical Systems. HL, RG and PP were employed by Philips Medical Systems at the time of the study. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Caen Normandie and Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc have a master research agreement with Philips Medical Systems.

Data Availability

All DICOM files of AP2, AP4 images will be made available upon acceptance on a public web page. An excel file containing all quantification from MR will also be made available.

  • List of Abbreviations and Acronyms

    AP4
    apical 2-chamber
    AP2
    apical 4-chamber
    CCC
    Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient
    CMP
    cardiomyopathy
    DL
    deep learning
    EF
    ejection fraction
    ED[V]
    end-diastolic [volume]
    ES[V]
    end-systolic [volume]
    LV
    left ventricle
    VOL
    healthy volunteer
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted July 29, 2022.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Deep Learning vs manual techniques for assessing left ventricular ejection fraction in 2D echocardiography: validation against CMR
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Deep Learning vs manual techniques for assessing left ventricular ejection fraction in 2D echocardiography: validation against CMR
    Eric Saloux, Alexandre Popoff, Hélène Langet, Paolo Piro, Camille Ropert, Romane Gauriau, Romain Stettler, Mihaela Silvia Amzulescu, Guillaume Pizaine, Pascal Allain, Olivier Bernard, Amir Hodzic, Alain Manrique, Mathieu De Craene, Bernhard L. Gerber
    medRxiv 2022.07.26.22278059; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.26.22278059
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Deep Learning vs manual techniques for assessing left ventricular ejection fraction in 2D echocardiography: validation against CMR
    Eric Saloux, Alexandre Popoff, Hélène Langet, Paolo Piro, Camille Ropert, Romane Gauriau, Romain Stettler, Mihaela Silvia Amzulescu, Guillaume Pizaine, Pascal Allain, Olivier Bernard, Amir Hodzic, Alain Manrique, Mathieu De Craene, Bernhard L. Gerber
    medRxiv 2022.07.26.22278059; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.26.22278059

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Cardiovascular Medicine
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)