Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Statistical Assessment of Biomarker Replicability using MAJAR Method

View ORCID ProfileYuhan Xie, Song Zhai, Wei Jiang, Hongyu Zhao, Devan V. Mehrotra, Judong Shen
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.08.22283210
Yuhan Xie
1Department of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yuhan Xie
Song Zhai
2Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wei Jiang
1Department of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongyu Zhao
1Department of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Devan V. Mehrotra
3Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., North Wales, PA 19454, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judong Shen
2Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: judong.shen{at}merck.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

In the era of precision medicine, many biomarkers have been discovered to be associated with drug efficacy and safety responses, which can be used for patient stratification and drug response prediction. Due to small sample size and limited power of randomized clinical studies, meta-analysis is usually conducted to aggregate all available studies to maximize the power for identifying prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Since all available data are already aggregated, it is often challenging to find an independent study to replicate the discoveries from the meta-analysis (e.g., in meta-analysis of pharmacogenomics genome-wide association studies (PGx GWAS)), which seriously limits the potential impacts of the discovered biomarkers. To overcome this challenge, we develop a novel statistical framework, MAJAR (Meta-Analysis of Joint effect Associations for biomarker Replicability assessment), to jointly test prognostic and predictive effects and assess the replicability of identified biomarkers by implementing an enhanced Expectation–Maximization algorithm and calculating their posterior-probability-of-replicabilities (PPR) and Bayesian false discovery rates (Fdr). Extensive simulation studies were conducted to compare the performance of MAJAR and existing methods in terms of Fdr, power, and computational efficiency. The simulation results showed improved statistical power with well-controlled Fdr of MAJAR over existing methods and robustness to outliers under different data generation processes while considering both prognostic and predictive effects in the model. We further demonstrated the advantages of MAJAR over existing methods by applying MAJAR to the PGx GWAS summary statistics data from a large cardiovascular randomized clinical trial (IMPROVE-IT). Compared to testing main effects only, MAJAR identified 12 novel variants associated with the treatment-related LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction from baseline.

Competing Interest Statement

S.Z., D.V.M. and J.S. are employees at Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Clinical Trial

NCT00202878

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This manuscript is mainly a methodology paper. The research has no procedure related to collecting human subject data. The IMPROVE-IT data or summary statistics data were obtained after a request.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Genotype data were processed using PLINK v2.00: https://www.cog-genomics.org/plink/1.9/; MAMBA R package: https://github.com/dan11mcguire/mamba; metafor R package v3.4.0: https://cran.r-project.org/package=metafor; Rcpp R package v1.0.9: https://cran.r-project.org/package=Rcpp; TMB R package v1.9.1: https://cran.r-project.org/package=TMB; figures were generated using ggplot2 R package v3.3.6: https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggplot2 and figures with break axis were generated using ggbreak package v0.1.1: https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggbreak; Manhattan plot was generated using qqman R package v0.1.8: https://cran.r-project.org/package=qqman; Venn diagram was generated using ggvenn R package v0.1.9: https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggvenn; upset plot was generated using UpSetR R package v1.4.0; GWAS Catalog: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas; Open Targets: https://www.opentargets.org. Our method is implemented in the MAJAR R package, freely available at https://github.com/JustinaXie/MAJAR.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 09, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Statistical Assessment of Biomarker Replicability using MAJAR Method
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Statistical Assessment of Biomarker Replicability using MAJAR Method
Yuhan Xie, Song Zhai, Wei Jiang, Hongyu Zhao, Devan V. Mehrotra, Judong Shen
medRxiv 2022.12.08.22283210; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.08.22283210
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Statistical Assessment of Biomarker Replicability using MAJAR Method
Yuhan Xie, Song Zhai, Wei Jiang, Hongyu Zhao, Devan V. Mehrotra, Judong Shen
medRxiv 2022.12.08.22283210; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.08.22283210

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)