Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Externally Validated Machine Learning Algorithm Accurately Predicts Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome in Military Trainees; A Multi-Cohort Study

Angus Shaw, Phillip Newman, Jeremy Witchalls, Tristan Hedger
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.19.23284808
Angus Shaw
aResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: a.shaw680{at}gmail.com
Phillip Newman
aResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Australia
bDepartment of Physiotherapy, Duntroon Health Centre, Canberra, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremy Witchalls
aResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Australia
bDepartment of Physiotherapy, Duntroon Health Centre, Canberra, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tristan Hedger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome (MTSS) is a common musculoskeletal injury, both in sports and the military. There is no reliable treatment and reoccurrence rates are high. Prevention of MTSS is critical to reducing operational burden. Therefore, this study aimed to build a decision-making model to predict the individual risk of MTSS within officer cadets and test the external validity of the model on a separate military population.

Design Prospective cohort study.

Methods This study collected a suite of key variables previously established for predicting MTSS. Data was obtained from 107 cadets (34 females and 73 males). A follow-up survey was conducted at 3-months to determine MTSS diagnoses. Six ensemble learning algorithms were deployed and trained 5 times on random stratified samples of 75% of the dataset. The resultant algorithms were tested on the remaining 25% of the dataset and the models were compared for accuracy. The most accurate new algorithm was tested on an unrelated data sample of 123 Australian Navy recruits to establish external validity of the model.

Results Random Forest modelling was the most accurate in identifying a diagnosis of MTSS; (AUC = 98%). When the model was tested on an external dataset, it performed with an accuracy of 94% (F1= 0.88).

Conclusion This model is highly accurate in predicting those who will develop MTSS. The model provides important preventive capacity which should be trialled as a risk management intervention.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics approval was obtained from The Departments of Defence and Veterans' Affairs (DDVA) Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (167-19), and the University of Canberra HREC (20193336)

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 20, 2023.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Externally Validated Machine Learning Algorithm Accurately Predicts Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome in Military Trainees; A Multi-Cohort Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Externally Validated Machine Learning Algorithm Accurately Predicts Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome in Military Trainees; A Multi-Cohort Study
Angus Shaw, Phillip Newman, Jeremy Witchalls, Tristan Hedger
medRxiv 2023.01.19.23284808; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.19.23284808
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Externally Validated Machine Learning Algorithm Accurately Predicts Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome in Military Trainees; A Multi-Cohort Study
Angus Shaw, Phillip Newman, Jeremy Witchalls, Tristan Hedger
medRxiv 2023.01.19.23284808; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.19.23284808

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Sports Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)