Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Safety and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing compared with right ventricular pacing in patients with bradyarrhythmia and conduction system disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View ORCID ProfileGeorgios Leventopoulos, View ORCID ProfileChristoforos K. Travlos, View ORCID ProfileKonstantinos N. Aronis, Virginia Anagnostopoulou, Panagiotis Patrinos, View ORCID ProfileAggeliki Papageorgiou, Angelos Perperis, View ORCID ProfileChris P. Gale, Periklis Davlouros
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.09.23285675
Georgios Leventopoulos
1Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Patras, Rio, Patras, Greece
MD PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Georgios Leventopoulos
  • For correspondence: levent2669{at}gmail.com
Christoforos K. Travlos
1Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Patras, Rio, Patras, Greece
2Department of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christoforos K. Travlos
Konstantinos N. Aronis
3Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
MD PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Konstantinos N. Aronis
Virginia Anagnostopoulou
1Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Patras, Rio, Patras, Greece
2Department of Medicine, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Panagiotis Patrinos
1Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Patras, Rio, Patras, Greece
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aggeliki Papageorgiou
1Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Patras, Rio, Patras, Greece
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aggeliki Papageorgiou
Angelos Perperis
1Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Patras, Rio, Patras, Greece
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris P. Gale
4Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
5Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
6Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
MD MSc PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chris P. Gale
Periklis Davlouros
1Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Patras, Rio, Patras, Greece
MD PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Right Ventricular Pacing (RVP) may have detrimental effects in ventricular function. Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP) is a new pacing strategy that appears to have better results. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the safety and efficacy of LBBAP vs RVP in patients with bradyarrhythmia and conduction system disorders.

Methods Medline, Embase and Pubmed databases were searched for studies comparing LBBAP with RVP. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence, heart failure hospitalizations (HFH) and complications. QRS duration, mechanical synchrony and LVEF changes were also assessed. Pairwise meta-analysis was conducted using random and fixed effects models.

Results Twenty-five trials with 4250 patients (2127 LBBAP) were included in the analysis. LBBAP was associated with lower risk for HFH (RR:0.33, CI 95%:0.21 to 0.50; p<0.001), all-cause mortality (RR:0.52 CI 95%:0.34 to 0.80; p=0.003), and AF occurrence (RR:0.43 CI 95%:0.27 to 0.68; p<0.001) than RVP. Lead related complications were not different between the two groups (p=0.780). QRSd was shorter in the LBBAP group at follow-up (WMD: -32.20 msec, CI 95%: -40.70 to -23.71; p<0.001) and LBBAP achieved better intraventricular mechanical synchrony than RVP (SMD: -1.77, CI 95%: -2.45 to -1.09; p<0.001). LBBAP had similar pacing thresholds (p=0.860) and higher R wave amplitudes (p=0.009) than RVP.

Conclusions LBBAP has better clinical outcomes, preserves ventricular electrical and mechanical synchrony and has excellent pacing parameters, with no difference in complications compared to RVP.

What is known

  • Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a method of conduction system pacing with higher procedural success rate and less limitations compared to His bundle pacing (HBP).

  • Right ventricular pacing (RVP) causes electromechanical dyssynchrony, which may result in left ventricular systolic dysfunction in some patients.

What the study adds

  • We examined in a systematic review and meta-analysis whether there was a difference in clinical outcomes, electromechanical synchronization, and safety between LBBAP and RVP in patients with bradyarrhythmia and conduction system disorders.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

None

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author at levent2669{at}gmail.com.

  • Non-standard Abbreviations and Acronyms

    AF
    atrial fibrillation
    AVB
    atrioventricular block
    AVN
    atrioventricular nodal
    BBB
    bundle branch block
    BVP
    biventricular pacing
    CRT
    cardiac resynchronization therapy
    DD
    diastolic dysfunction
    FU
    follow-up
    HBP
    His-bundle pacing
    HFH
    heart failure hospitalization
    IVMD
    interventricular mechanical delay
    LBB
    left bundle branch
    LBBAP
    left bundle branch area pacing
    LVEDD
    left ventricular end-diastolic diameter
    LVEF
    left ventricular ejection fraction
    RCT
    randomized controlled trial
    RVP
    right ventricular pacing
    SND
    sinus node dysfunction
    SPWMD
    septal to posterior wall motion delay
    Stim-LVAT
    stim to left ventricular activation time
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted February 10, 2023.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Safety and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing compared with right ventricular pacing in patients with bradyarrhythmia and conduction system disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Safety and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing compared with right ventricular pacing in patients with bradyarrhythmia and conduction system disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Georgios Leventopoulos, Christoforos K. Travlos, Konstantinos N. Aronis, Virginia Anagnostopoulou, Panagiotis Patrinos, Aggeliki Papageorgiou, Angelos Perperis, Chris P. Gale, Periklis Davlouros
    medRxiv 2023.02.09.23285675; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.09.23285675
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Safety and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing compared with right ventricular pacing in patients with bradyarrhythmia and conduction system disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Georgios Leventopoulos, Christoforos K. Travlos, Konstantinos N. Aronis, Virginia Anagnostopoulou, Panagiotis Patrinos, Aggeliki Papageorgiou, Angelos Perperis, Chris P. Gale, Periklis Davlouros
    medRxiv 2023.02.09.23285675; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.09.23285675

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Cardiovascular Medicine
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)