Abstract
Purpose Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been proposed for super-resolution in CT, but training of CNNs requires high-resolution reference data. Higher spatial resolution can also be achieved using deconvolution, but conventional deconvolution approaches amplify noise. We develop a CNN that mitigates increasing noise and that does not require higher-resolution reference images.
Methods Our model includes a noise reduction CNN and a deconvolution CNN that are separately trained. The noise reduction CNN is a U-Net, similar to other noise reduction CNNs found in the literature. The deconvolution CNN uses an autoencoder, where the decoder is fixed and provided as a hyperparameter that represents the system point spread function. The encoder is trained to provide a deconvolution that does not amplify noise. Ringing can occur from deconvolution but is controlled with a difference of gradients loss function term. Our technique was demonstrated on a variety of patient images and on ex vivo kidney stones.
Results The noise reduction and deconvolution CNNs produced visually sharper images at low noise. In ex vivo mixed kidney stones, better visual delineation of the kidney stone components could be seen.
Conclusions A noise reduction and deconvolution CNN improves spatial resolution and reduces noise without requiring higher-resolution reference images.
Competing Interest Statement
Cynthia H. McCollough is the recipient of a research grant to the institution from Siemens Heathineers. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this work was supported by the National Institutes of Health under award number R01 EB028591. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board of Mayo Clinic gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data from this study are not available due to patient confidentiality restrictions.
