ABSTRACT
Purpose Self-harm and suicide behaviours are a major public health concern. Several factors are associated with these behaviours among military communities. Identifying these factors may have important implications for policy and clinical services. The aim of this review was to identify the risk and protective factors associated with self-harm and suicide behaviours among serving and ex-serving personnel of the United Kingdom Armed Forces, Canadian Armed Forces, Australian Defence Force and New Zealand Defence Force.
Methods A systematic search of seven online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Global Health, PsycINFO, PTSDpubs and CINAHL) was conducted alongside cross-referencing, in October 2022. Following an a priori PROSPERO approved protocol (CRD42022348867), papers were independently screened and assessed for quality. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach.
Results Overall, 28 papers were included: 13 from Canada, 10 from the United Kingdom, five from Australia and none from New Zealand. Identified risk factors included being single/ex-relationship, early service leavers, shorter length of service, junior ranks, exposure to deployment-related traumatic events, physical and mental health diagnoses, and experience of childhood adversity. Protective included being married/in a relationship, higher educational attainment, employment, senior ranks, and higher levels of perceived social support.
Conclusion Adequate care and support are a necessity for the military community. Prevention and intervention strategies for self-harm and suicide behaviours should be introduced early and should promote social networks as a key source of support. This review found a paucity of peer-reviewed research within some populations. More peer-reviewed research is needed, particularly among these populations where current work is limited, and regarding modifiable risk and protective factors.
Competing Interest Statement
CW is currently in receipt of a funded PhD studentship via Phase 4 of the Kings Centre for Military Health Research Health and Wellbeing Cohort Study funded by the Office for Veterans Affairs (OVA) Cabinet Office UK Government. BC is currently in receipt of a funded PhD studentship from The Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) UK Government. AS is a full-time member of the British Army seconded to Kings College London. NTF is partly funded by the United Kingdom Ministry of Defence (MOD). MLS is fully funded by a grant from the OVA. SAMS is supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and the National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR Advanced Fellowship (Dr Sharon Stevelink NIHR300592). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the OVA; the ESRC; the British Army; the MOD; the NHS; or the NIHR.
Funding Statement
This work is part of a PhD nested within Phase 4 of the Kings Centre for Military Health Research Health and Wellbeing Cohort Study and funded by the OVA. For the purposes of open access the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Accepted Author Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵^ Joint last authors
This version of the manuscript has been revised to reword one of the conclusions made.
Data Availability
Data availability is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.
