Abstract
Introduction Sustained engagement in care among people living with HIV is vital for realising the individual and public health benefits of antiretroviral therapy (ART). We examined whether mobile phone-based text messages that leveraged behavioural science principles promoted timely clinic attendance among ART recipients.
Methods We conducted a randomized controlled trial in three primary health clinics in Gauteng Province, South Africa between July 2021 and December 2021. ART recipients with an upcoming clinic appointment were randomised to standard of care appointment reminders or three enhanced reminders that leveraged behavioural science principles of loss aversion, social norms, and altruism. The primary outcome was a timely clinic visit, on or before the scheduled appointment day. Poisson regression with clinic fixed effects and controls for age, sex, and ART duration was used to examine the effect of the enhanced reminders on the primary outcome.
Results Among 1539 participants, 690 (44.8%) were male and median time on ART was 11 months (IQR, 3.7-51.9). The primary outcome of timely clinic visit was 50.3% in the standard of care arm, and similar in the loss aversion arm (53.5%; adjusted risk ratio, ARR 1.1; 95% CI: 0.9-1.2), social norms arm (48.0%; ARR 1.1; 95% CI: 0.8-1.1), and altruism arm (50.9% ARR 1.0; 95% CI: 0.9-1.5). In subgroup analyses, messages framed with loss aversion increased the timely clinic visits among participants with ART duration <90 days (ARR=1.37; 95% CI: 1.08-1.74).
Conclusions The use of behavioural science principles to frame reminder messages did not increase timely clinic visits among HIV care recipients. Among those who recently initiated ART, however, loss aversion framing increased timely clinic visits. Future research should explore alternative behavioural science principles to revise health communication with HIV care recipients.
Clinical Trials Number NCT05010291
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT05010291
Funding Statement
This analysis was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-008318). The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsor. The funders had no role in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, in manuscript preparation or the decision to publish.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the research ethics committees at the University of the Witwatersrand # 210308 and University of Pennsylvania # 849826 A waiver of participant consent was obtained from the University of Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee, the Ekurhuleni Research Ethics Committee, and the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board, as the study did not alter routine care delivery, did not involve more than minimal risk to recipients of care, and could not have been practicably carried out without a waiver of client consent
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Corrected author name
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
