Abstract
Background The treatment of pain in the emergency department (ED) has historically relied on pharmacological analgesia. However, little is known about the concurrent use of non-pharmacological analgesia.
Aims/Objectives This research explores the self-reported use and outcomes of non-pharmacological analgesia in adult ED patients with moderate to severe pain.
Methods This is a cross-sectional study in an adult ED of self-reported use of non-pharmacological pain management via a patient-reported outcome measure. The results are presented with descriptive statistics and multivariable modelling.
Results 45.8% (n=296) of all respondents used non-pharmacological interventions. The most used non-pharmacological interventions are hot packs (34.9%, n=103), distraction (22.3%, n=66), and cold packs (12.9%, n=38). In multivariate modelling, females, patients who did not receive pre-hospital analgesia, and daily average access block time all affected the use of non-pharmacological analgesia. Within a multivariable model, non-pharmacological analgesia increased the amount of pain relief achieved.
Conclusion Non-pharmacological analgesia use is affected by gender, treatment before the ED and ED workload. Nevertheless, clear benefits to the use of non-pharmacological analgesia were seen. Further work must be undertaken to encourage providers’ use of this modality and capture any additional benefits to the patient.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Emergency Medicine Foundation
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee gave approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: All authors on this work report no conflict of interest.
Ethical Statement: Ethical approval was granted by the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital’s Human Research Ethics Committee to conduct the study (LNR/2019/QRBW/55143).
Funding Source: This work was supported by the Emergency Medicine Foundation (Australia) [grant: EMLE-166R34-Hughes].
(@perfectednurse)
Data Availability
Due to local regulations this data is not available
