Abstract
Community health workers (CHWs) play an important role in health systems in low– and middle-income countries, including South Africa. Bukhali is a CHW-delivered intervention as part of a randomised controlled trial, to improve the health trajectories of young women in Soweto, South Africa. This study aimed to qualitatively explore factors influencing implementation of the preconception and pregnancy phases of Bukhali, from the perspective of the CHWs (Health Helpers, HHs) delivering the intervention. As part of the Bukhali trial process evaluation, three focus group discussions were conducted with the 13 HHs employed by the trial. A thematic approach was used to analyse the data, drawing on elements of a reflexive thematic and codebook approach. The following six themes were developed, representing factors impacting implementation of the HH roles: interaction with the existing public healthcare sector; participant perceptions of health; health literacy and language barriers; participants’ socioeconomic constraints; family, partner, and community views of trial components; and the HH-participant relationship. HHs reported uses of several trial-based tools to overcome implementation challenges, increasing their ability to implement their roles as planned. The relationship of trust between the HH and participants seemed to function as one important mechanism for impact. The findings supported a number of adaptations to the implementation of Bukhali, such as intensified trial-based follow-up of referrals that do not receive management at clinics, continued HH training and community engagement parallel to trial implementation, with an increased emphasis on health-related stigma and education.
HH perspectives on intervention implementation highlighted adaptations relevant to the Bukhali intervention, other CHW-delivered preconception and pregnancy trials, and ‘real-world’ CHW roles, across three broad strategic areas: navigating and bridging healthcare systems, adaptability to individual participant needs, and navigating stigma around disease.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
identifier: PACTR201903750173871
Clinical Protocols
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/4/e059914
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the South African Medical Research Council and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. SAN, KM, and LMS and this research are supported by the DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence (CoE) in Human Development at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. The content is solely the responsibility of the author and does not reflect the views of the DSI-NRF CoE in Human Development.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) at the University of the Witwatersrand approved the study (M190449). All procedures were carried out according to the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, revised in 2008, and the HHs gave written informed consent to participate in the study.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
The authors do not have permission to share the data for this study, due to ethical concerns from the relevant Human Resource Ethics Committee about sharing qualitative interview data outside of the research team.
