Evaluation of polygenic scoring methods in five biobanks reveals greater variability between biobanks than between methods and highlights benefits of ensemble learning
View ORCID ProfileRemo Monti, Lisa Eick, View ORCID ProfileGeorgi Hudjashov, Kristi Läll, View ORCID ProfileStavroula Kanoni, View ORCID ProfileBrooke N. Wolford, View ORCID ProfileBenjamin Wingfield, View ORCID ProfileOliver Pain, View ORCID ProfileSophie Wharrie, View ORCID ProfileBradley Jermy, View ORCID ProfileAoife McMahon, View ORCID ProfileTuomo Hartonen, View ORCID ProfileHenrike Heyne, View ORCID ProfileNina Mars, Genes & Health Research Team, Kristian Hveem, View ORCID ProfileMichael Inouye, View ORCID ProfileDavid A. van Heel, View ORCID ProfileReedik Mägi, View ORCID ProfilePekka Marttinen, View ORCID ProfileSamuli Ripatti, View ORCID ProfileAndrea Ganna, View ORCID ProfileChristoph Lippert
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.20.23298215
Remo Monti
1Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Digital Engineering Faculty, Potsdam, Germany
2Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology, Berlin, Germany
Lisa Eick
3Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki,Helsinki, Finland
Georgi Hudjashov
4Estonian Genome Centre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
Kristi Läll
4Estonian Genome Centre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
Stavroula Kanoni
5William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
Brooke N. Wolford
6K. G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
Benjamin Wingfield
7European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
Oliver Pain
8Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
Sophie Wharrie
9Aalto University, Department of Computer Science, Espoo, Finland
Bradley Jermy
3Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki,Helsinki, Finland
Aoife McMahon
7European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
Tuomo Hartonen
3Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki,Helsinki, Finland
Henrike Heyne
1Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Digital Engineering Faculty, Potsdam, Germany
Nina Mars
3Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki,Helsinki, Finland
10Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
11Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research and Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
Kristian Hveem
6K. G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
Michael Inouye
12Cambridge Baker Systems Genomics Initiative, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
13Cambridge Baker Systems Genomics Initiative, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
14British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
15Victor Phillip Dahdaleh Heart and Lung Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
16British Heart Foundation Cambridge Centre of Research Excellence, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
17Health Data Research UK Cambridge, Wellcome Genome Campus and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
18Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, UK
David A. van Heel
Reedik Mägi
4Estonian Genome Centre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
Pekka Marttinen
9Aalto University, Department of Computer Science, Espoo, Finland
Samuli Ripatti
3Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki,Helsinki, Finland
19Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
20Massachusetts General Hospital and Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge,MA, USA
Andrea Ganna
3Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki,Helsinki, Finland
20Massachusetts General Hospital and Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge,MA, USA
Christoph Lippert
1Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Digital Engineering Faculty, Potsdam, Germany
21Windreich Dept. of Artificial Intelligence & Human Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
22Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health at Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
23Department of Diagnostic, Molecular, and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Article usage
Posted November 20, 2023.
Evaluation of polygenic scoring methods in five biobanks reveals greater variability between biobanks than between methods and highlights benefits of ensemble learning
Remo Monti, Lisa Eick, Georgi Hudjashov, Kristi Läll, Stavroula Kanoni, Brooke N. Wolford, Benjamin Wingfield, Oliver Pain, Sophie Wharrie, Bradley Jermy, Aoife McMahon, Tuomo Hartonen, Henrike Heyne, Nina Mars, Genes & Health Research Team, Kristian Hveem, Michael Inouye, David A. van Heel, Reedik Mägi, Pekka Marttinen, Samuli Ripatti, Andrea Ganna, Christoph Lippert
medRxiv 2023.11.20.23298215; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.20.23298215
Evaluation of polygenic scoring methods in five biobanks reveals greater variability between biobanks than between methods and highlights benefits of ensemble learning
Remo Monti, Lisa Eick, Georgi Hudjashov, Kristi Läll, Stavroula Kanoni, Brooke N. Wolford, Benjamin Wingfield, Oliver Pain, Sophie Wharrie, Bradley Jermy, Aoife McMahon, Tuomo Hartonen, Henrike Heyne, Nina Mars, Genes & Health Research Team, Kristian Hveem, Michael Inouye, David A. van Heel, Reedik Mägi, Pekka Marttinen, Samuli Ripatti, Andrea Ganna, Christoph Lippert
medRxiv 2023.11.20.23298215; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.20.23298215
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Addiction Medicine (349)
- Allergy and Immunology (668)
- Allergy and Immunology (668)
- Anesthesia (181)
- Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
- Dermatology (223)
- Emergency Medicine (399)
- Epidemiology (12228)
- Forensic Medicine (10)
- Gastroenterology (759)
- Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
- Geriatric Medicine (387)
- Health Economics (680)
- Health Informatics (2657)
- Health Policy (1005)
- Hematology (363)
- HIV/AIDS (851)
- Medical Education (399)
- Medical Ethics (109)
- Nephrology (436)
- Neurology (3882)
- Nursing (209)
- Nutrition (577)
- Oncology (2030)
- Ophthalmology (585)
- Orthopedics (240)
- Otolaryngology (306)
- Pain Medicine (250)
- Palliative Medicine (75)
- Pathology (473)
- Pediatrics (1115)
- Primary Care Research (452)
- Public and Global Health (6527)
- Radiology and Imaging (1403)
- Respiratory Medicine (871)
- Rheumatology (409)
- Sports Medicine (342)
- Surgery (448)
- Toxicology (53)
- Transplantation (185)
- Urology (165)