Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Evaluation value of bedside ultrasound monitoring of peak flow velocity of abdominal aorta and its branches in volume status of patients with septic shock

View ORCID ProfileChen Wenchong, Guo Weixin, Zeng Xiaodan, Li Deping, Luo Jianli, Zhou Yafeng, Zhao Sicheng, Lu Pinghui
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.22.24303100
Chen Wenchong
1Department of ICU,Foshan Rehabilitation Hospital,Foshan 528200,China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chen Wenchong
  • For correspondence: 287345306{at}qq.com
Guo Weixin
2Department of Geriatric Intensive Medicine,Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital,Guangzhou 510080,China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zeng Xiaodan
1Department of ICU,Foshan Rehabilitation Hospital,Foshan 528200,China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li Deping
1Department of ICU,Foshan Rehabilitation Hospital,Foshan 528200,China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luo Jianli
1Department of ICU,Foshan Rehabilitation Hospital,Foshan 528200,China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhou Yafeng
1Department of ICU,Foshan Rehabilitation Hospital,Foshan 528200,China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhao Sicheng
1Department of ICU,Foshan Rehabilitation Hospital,Foshan 528200,China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lu Pinghui
1Department of ICU,Foshan Rehabilitation Hospital,Foshan 528200,China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To explore the value of bedside ultrasound in monitoring peak flow velocity of abdominal aorta and its branches in assessing the volume status of patients with septic shock.

Methods A total of 80 patients with septic shock admitted to the Foshan Rehabilitation Hospital(The Fifth People’s Hospital of Foshan) and the Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital from June 2022 to June 2023 were selected as the research subjects. All patients were treated with mechanical ventilation,and deep venous catheters were placed in the internal jugular vein or subclavian vein to monitor central venous pressure (CVP).PiCCO catheters were placed in the femoral artery to monitor hemodynamic data.At the same time,the maximum internal diameter of the inferior vena cava (IVCmax),the respiratory variation of the inferior vena cava (□IVC),the peak flow velocity of the abdominal aorta (VpeakAA),the peak flow velocity of the celiac artery (VpeakCA),and the peak flow velocity of the superior mesenteric artery (VpeakSMA)were monitored under bedside ultrasound.The global end-diastolic volumn index(GEDI)was used as a grouping indicator,with GEDI≤680ml/m2 as the low-volume group and GEDI≥800ml/m2 as the high-volume group.Compare the differences in peak flow velocity between the abdominal aorta,celiac artery,and superior mesenteric artery between the two groups,and analyze the correlation between peak flow velocity of the abdominal aorta,celiac artery,and superior mesenteric artery and IVCmax,ΔIVC,CVP,and stroke volume variability (SVV);draw a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the subjects,calculate the area under the curve,and find the diagnostic threshold.

Results There was no significant difference in general data between the two groups (P>0.05).The VpeakAA,VpeakCA,and VpeakSMA in the high-volume group were all higher than those in the low-volume group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). However,VpeakCA and VpeakSMA were significantly correlated with IVCmax, △ IVC,CVP,and SVV (P<0.05).The ROC curve analysis showed that VpeakAA,VpeakCA,and VpeakSMA could effectively evaluate the volume status of patients with septic shock, and the area under the VpeakSMA curve was 0.846,with a 95% confidence interval of 0.693-0.999,and had high sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusion Bedside ultrasound can dynamically monitor VpeakAA,VpeakCA,and VpeakSMA,which has great value in the evaluation of volume status in patients with septic shock.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Foshan Fifth People's Hospital[2022](No. 0610).The approval date was July 6th, 2022.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 24, 2024.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation value of bedside ultrasound monitoring of peak flow velocity of abdominal aorta and its branches in volume status of patients with septic shock
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evaluation value of bedside ultrasound monitoring of peak flow velocity of abdominal aorta and its branches in volume status of patients with septic shock
Chen Wenchong, Guo Weixin, Zeng Xiaodan, Li Deping, Luo Jianli, Zhou Yafeng, Zhao Sicheng, Lu Pinghui
medRxiv 2024.02.22.24303100; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.22.24303100
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Evaluation value of bedside ultrasound monitoring of peak flow velocity of abdominal aorta and its branches in volume status of patients with septic shock
Chen Wenchong, Guo Weixin, Zeng Xiaodan, Li Deping, Luo Jianli, Zhou Yafeng, Zhao Sicheng, Lu Pinghui
medRxiv 2024.02.22.24303100; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.22.24303100

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Emergency Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)