Abstract
Nipah virus disease is a bat-borne zoonosis with person-to-person transmission, a case fatality rate of 38-75%, and recognised pandemic potential. The first reported outbreak occurred in Malaysia and Singapore in 1998, since followed by multiple outbreaks in Bangladesh and India. No therapeutics or vaccines have been licensed to date, and only few candidates are in development. This systematic review aimed to assess the evidence for the safety and efficacy of therapeutic options (monoclonal antibodies and small molecules) for Nipah virus and other henipaviral diseases in order to support candidate prioritisation for further evaluation in clinical trials. At present, there is sufficient evidence to trial only m102.4 and remdesivir (singly and/or in combination) for prophylaxis and early treatment of Nipah virus disease. In addition to well-designed clinical efficacy trials, in vivo pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies to optimise selection and dosing of therapeutic candidates in animal challenge and natural human infection are needed.
Evidence before this study Nipah virus infection is a bat-borne zoonosis with person-to-person transmission, a case fatality rate of 38-75%, and recognised pandemic potential. No therapeutics or vaccines have been licensed to date, and only few candidates are in development. We conducted this systematic review to assess the evidence for the safety and efficacy of therapeutic options (monoclonal antibodies and small molecules) for Nipah virus and other henipaviral diseases to support candidate prioritisation for further evaluation in clinical trials.
We searched bibliographic databases for journal articles, conference abstracts, and patents: PubMed, Ovid Embase, Ovid CAB Abstracts, Ovid Global Health, Scopus, Web of Science (all databases), and the WHO Global Index Medicus. “Henipavirus” or “Nipah” or “Hendra” along with “therapeutics” or “monoclonal” were the title, abstract, and subject heading keywords, with synonyms and variant spellings as additional search terms. We searched trial registries for clinical trials of Henipavirus, Nipah virus, and Hendra virus at all stages of recruitment: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. We searched the Trip database and WHO website for guidelines and reports. All searches were conducted on 30 May 2022. We did not apply language or publication date limits.
Studies were included if they contained primary data on the safety and/or efficacy of monoclonal antibodies (in vivo) or small molecules (in vivo or in vitro) for the treatment and/or prophylaxis of Nipah, Hendra, and related Henipaviridae. Almost all had critical or high risk of bias.
Added value of this study This is the most detailed systematic review and analysis of the Nipah virus therapeutics landscape to date, including all available in vivo and related in vitro data on the safety, efficacy, and pharmaco-kinetics of monoclonal antibodies and small molecules with the specific aim of supporting prioritisation for clinical trials. We also present a roadmap for how in vivo development of Nipah therapeutics could be strengthened to achieve greater equity, efficiency, and effectiveness.
Implications of the available evidence At present, there is sufficient evidence to trial only m102.4 and remdesivir for prophylaxis and early treatment of Nipah virus infection. Well-designed clinical efficacy trials as well as in vivo pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies to optimise selection and dosing of therapeutic candidates in animal challenge and natural human infection are needed.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
XHSC is a United Kingdom (UK) National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR) Academic Clinical Lecturer in Infectious Diseases at the University of Oxford. MZH is a Moh Family Foundation Fellow at the Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford. JD is supported by the Moh Family Foundation, the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, and the UK Public Health Rapid Support Team Research Programme (grant number IS-RRT-1015-001). JT is supported by the Wellcome Trust (grant number 220211). PWH is the Moh Family Foundation Professor of Emerging Infections and Global Health at the Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford. PWH and PLO are supported by the UK Foreign and Commonwealth, and Development Office, the Wellcome Trust (grant number 215091/Z/18/Z), and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (grant number OPP1209135).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
