Abstract
Over 30 international research studies and commercial laboratories are exploring the use of genomic sequencing to screen apparently healthy newborns for genetic disorders. These programs have individualized processes for determining which genes and genetic disorders are queried and reported in newborns. We compared lists of genes from 26 research and commercial newborn screening programs and found substantial heterogeneity among the genes included. A total of 1,750 genes were included in at least one newborn genome sequencing program, but only 74 genes were included on >80% of gene lists, 16 of which are not associated with conditions on the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel. We used a linear regression model to explore factors related to the inclusion of individual genes across programs, finding that a high evidence base as well as treatment efficacy were two of the most important factors for inclusion. We applied a machine learning model to predict how suitable a gene is for newborn sequencing. As knowledge about and treatments for genetic disorders expand, this model provides a dynamic tool to reassess genes for newborn screening implementation. This study highlights the complex landscape of gene list curation among genomic newborn screening programs and proposes an empirical path forward for determining the genes and disorders of highest priority for newborn screening programs.
Competing Interest Statement
L.M.A., A.J.C. and R.J.T. are employees and shareholders at Illumina Inc. N.G. is co-founder and equity owner of Datavisyn. N.B.G. provides occasional consulting services to RCG Consulting and receives honoraria from Ambry Genetics. R.C.G. has received compensation for advising the following companies: Allelica, Atria, Fabric, Genomic Life and Juniper Genomics; and is co-founder of Genome Medical and Nurture Genomics. B.E.R. and K.L.S. are consultants at Nurture Genomics. L.S. received personal compensation from Zentech and Illumina Inc. P.T. is a co-founder of PlumCare RWE, LLC.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the following grants: T32GM007748 (S.B.), R01HG011773 (N.G.), K08HG012811-01 (N.B.G.), TR003201 (N.B.G.), HD077671 (R.C.G.) and TR003201 (R.C.G.).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The supplemental information was updated, as one page was missing from the previous version.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
